Patient Navigation by Community Health Workers Increases Access to Surgical Care in Rural Haiti.

INTRODUCTION: In the Hôpital Albert Schweitzer district in rural Haiti, patients from mountain areas receive fewer operations per capita than patients from the plains. Possible additional barriers for mountain patients include lower socioeconomic status, lack of awareness of financial support, illiteracy and unfamiliarity with the hospital system. We sought to increase the rate of elective surgery for a mountain population using a patient navigation program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient navigators were trained to guide subjects from a mountain population through the entire hospital process for elective surgery. We compared the rate of elective operations before and after the patient navigation intervention between three groups: a control group from a mountainous area, a control group from the plains and an intervention group from a mountainous area. RESULTS: The baseline elective operation rate differed significantly between the plains control group, the mountain control group and the mountain intervention group (361 vs. 57 vs. 68 operations per 100,000 population per year). The rate of elective surgery between the two mountain groups was not statistically different prior to the intervention. After the intervention, the elective operation rate in the mountain group that received patient navigation increased from 68 to 131 operations per 100,000 population per year (p = 0.017). DISCUSSION: Patient navigation doubled the elective operation rate for a mountain population in rural Haiti. While additional barriers to access remain for this vulnerable population, patient navigation is an essential augmentation to financial assistance programs to ensure that the poor gain access to surgical care.

The struggle for equity: an examination of surgical services at two NGO hospitals in rural Haiti.

BACKGROUND: Health systems must deliver care equitably to serve the poor. Both L'Hôpital Albert Schweitzer (HAS) and L'Hôpital Bon Sauveur (HBS) have longstanding commitments to provide equitable surgical care in rural Haiti. HAS charges fees that reflect a preference for the rural population near the hospital, with free care available for the poorest. HBS does not charge fees. The two hospitals are otherwise similar in surgical capacity and rural location. Using geography as a proxy for poverty, we analysed the equity achieved under the financial system at both hospitals. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed operative case-logs for general surgery and orthopaedic cases at both hospitals from June 1, to Aug 31, 2012. The records were compared by total number of operations, geographic distribution of patients, and number of elective operations. The service areas were defined as the governmental administrative units closest to both hospitals. For HAS, we analysed the number of operations performed on patients from the most poor and least poor regions within the service area; similarly detailed geographic information was not available from HBS. Rates were compared with χ(2) tests. The Ethics Committees at both hospitals and the Institutional Review Board at Partners Healthcare approved the study. FINDINGS: Patients from the rural service area received 306 operations (86·2%) at HAS compared with 149 (38·1%) at HBS (p<0·0001). Only 16 operations (4·5%) at HAS were performed on patients from outside the service area for elective conditions compared with 179 (47·0%) at HBS (p<0·0001). Within its rural service area, HAS performed fewer operations on patients from the most destitute areas compared with other locations (4·0 operations per 10 000 population vs 10·1 operations per 10 000 population; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Use of fees as part of an equity strategy will likely disadvantage the poorest patients, while providing care without fees might encourage patients to travel from urban areas that contain other hospitals. Health systems striving to serve the poor should continually evaluate and seek to improve equity, even within systems that provide free care. FUNDING: None.

Community health workers and smartphones for the detection of surgical site infections in rural Haiti: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Absence of outcome data is a barrier to quality improvement in resource poor settings. To address this challenge, we set out to determine whether follow up for surgical site infections (SSIs) using community health workers (CHWs) and smartphones is feasible in rural Haiti. METHODS: In this pilot study, all patients from a specific mountain region who received an operation between March 10, and July 1, 2014, at Hôpital Albert Schweitzer in rural Haiti were eligible for inclusion. Patients or guardians of minors were approached for consent. We designed a smartphone application to enable CHWs to screen for SSIs during home visits by administering a questionnaire, obtaining GPS data, and submitting a photograph of an incision. We selected and trained CHWs to use the smartphone application and compensated them based on performance. CHWs completed home visits for 30 days after an operation for all participants. Surgeons examined all participants within 24 h after the second CHW home visit. Primary outcomes included the number of participants completing 30-day follow-up and home visits made on time. Secondary outcomes included the quality of the photographs and the agreement between surgeons and CHWs on the diagnosis of SSI. The Partners Healthcare institutional review board and the Ethics Committee at Hôpital Albert Schweitzer approved the study protocol. FINDINGS: Five CHWs completed 30-day follow up for 37 of 39 participants (94·9%) and completed 107 of 117 home visits on time (91·5%). High quality photographs were submitted for 101 of 117 visits (86·3%). Surgeons and CHWs agreed on the diagnosis of SSI in 28 of 33 cases (84·8%). INTERPRETATION: Outpatient follow up for SSIs with CHWs and smartphones is feasible in rural Haiti. Further validation of the programme needs to be done before widespread adoption or advocating for task shifting post-operative follow up to CHWs. FUNDING: Partners Healthcare, Children's Hospital Boston, and Swiss Bündner Partnerschaft Hôpital Albert Schweitzer Haiti.

The Struggle for Equity: An Examination of Surgical Services at Two NGO Hospitals in Rural Haiti.

BACKGROUND: Health systems must deliver care equitably in order to serve the poor. Both L'Hôpital Albert Schweitzer (HAS) and L'Hôpital Bon Sauveur (HBS) have longstanding commitments to provide equitable surgical care in rural Haiti. HAS charges fees that demonstrate a preference for the rural population near the hospital, with free care available for the poorest. HBS does not charge fees. The two hospitals are otherwise similar in surgical capacity and rural location. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed operative case-logs at both hospitals from June 1 to Aug 31, 2012. The records were compared by total number of operations, geographic distribution of patients and number of elective operations. Using geography as a proxy for poverty, we analyzed the equity achieved under the financial systems at both hospitals. RESULTS: Patients from the rural service area received 86% of operations at HAS compared to 38% at HBS (p < 0.001). Only 5% of all operations at HAS were performed on patients from outside the service area for elective conditions compared to 47% at HBS (p < 0.001). Within its rural service area, HAS performed fewer operations on patients from the most destitute areas compared to other locations (40.3 vs. 101.3 operations/100,000 population, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using fees as part of an equity strategy will likely disadvantage the poorest patients, while providing care without fees may encourage patients to travel from urban areas that contain other hospitals. Health systems striving to serve the poor should continually evaluate and seek to improve equity, even within systems that provide free care.