Dynamics of the antibodies in cohorts of cured cases of visceral leishmaniasis: its implication on the validity of serological test, value in prognosis and in post therapeutic assessment.

The major disadvantage of a Serological test like Direct Agglutination Test (DAT) for Visceral Leishmaniasis (also called Kala-azar) is its inability to distinguish between recent and past infection. The objective of our study was to look at rate of decline of antibodies in fully cured cases of Kala-azar and length of time it takes for DAT to become negative. Cohort Study involving completely treated Kala-azar cases from Government Hospital during one calendar year of study. Cases were selected on the basis of treatment cohorts 0, 3, 6, 9 & 12 mo after completion of treatment.. Phase I--The cases were traced and after obtaining the informed consent they were subjected to Direct Agglutination Test (DAT). Phase II--The five treatment cohorts, constituting 82 cured cases (average of 15 cured cases per each treatment cohort) were tested again with DAT three months after the first test. The titers of Phase-I and phase-II tests were analyzed for the dynamics of the antibodies for the period. Cutoff-Values of DAT below 1:800 are considered negative. Values of 1:800, 1:1200, 1:1600 and so on are considered positive. The mean titer [Geometric Mean Titer (GMT)] at the start of treatment was 1:1120, which showed steady decline up to six months, plummeting below the cutoff titer for the DAT (1:800) at the ninth month. Antibodies continue to linger for about one year in cured Kala-azar cases even after correct and complete treatment. Single DAT results may be misleading due to high false positivity up to one year after the cure. Paired test defined as two tests 3 mo apart on the same subject. Paired test is highly recommended for diagnosis and prognosis. DAT is still a very useful tool for diagnosis if used along with clinical correlation.

Evaluation of the RIPASA Score: a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

Introduction: We recently developed a scoring system for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. This study prospectively evaluates the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients presenting to the Accident & Emergency department or the Surgical wards with right iliac fossa pain. Materials and Methods: From November 2008 to April 2009, consecutive patients presenting to the Accident & Emergency department or the surgical wards with right iliac fossa pain were recruited for the study. The RIPASA score was applied but the decision for radiological investigations or emergency appendicectomy was made based on clinical judgement. Receiver operating curve (ROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the new scoring system were derived. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Medical & Health Review Ethics Committee. Results: Within six months, 144 consecutive patients with a mean age of 29.5 ± 13.3 yrs were recruited to the study. Ninety-eight patients underwent emergency appendicectomy of which 79 were confirmed histologically for acute appendicitis. The observed negative appendicectomy rate was 19.4%. The optimal cut-off threshold score from the ROC was 7.5, with a sensitivity of 97.5%, specificity of 81.8%, PPV of 86.5%, NPV of 96.4% and a diagnostic accuracy of 91.8%. The predicted negative appendicectomy rate was 13.5%, which is a 5.9% reduction from the observed rate of 19.4% (p=0.3). Conclusion: The RIPASA score is a more suitable appendicitis scoring system developed for our local settings with a population that is reflective of our region in South-east Asia and has high sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy.

Value of penicillin in the prevention of pain, swelling and trismus following the removal of ectopic mandibular third molars.

A double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study of the value of systemic penicillin in preventing pain, swelling and trismus following the removal of impacted mandibular third molars and indicates that penicillin may be used justifiably in the more difficult cases.