ABSTRACT
Congenital Permanent Childhood Hearing Impairment (PCHI) is known to have a negative effect on language acquisition, cognitive development and social integration. Since 2000 our department has implemented a UNHS program in the West of Ireland. We describe our experience and detail our results to date. All neonates born from October 2000 to November 2007 were screened using a 2-stage protocol. Transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions (TEOAEs) were used to screen all neonates, followed by automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) in those who did not pass TEOAE, and all neonates at audiological risk. 26,281 babies were born over the eight year period. 25,742 underwent the screening process, achieving a coverage rate of 98%. The prevalence of PCHI in the population tested was 1.21/1000 live births (31/25,731). Our results show that a hospital based 2-stage UNHS protocol using TEOAEs and AABR is accurate, feasible and effective.
Subject(s)
Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Neonatal Screening/methods , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Female , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Ireland/epidemiology , Male , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/physiology , Prevalence , Sensitivity and Specificity , State MedicineABSTRACT
External ear manifestations of sarcoidosis are rare. We review six cases in the literature and also report a case. The otolaryngologist plays an important role in making the diagnosis because of the ease of biopsy in all cases of sarcoidosis of the external ear.
Subject(s)
Ear Diseases/diagnosis , Ear, External , Sarcoidosis/diagnosis , Adult , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Male , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To validate the usefulness of written information for patients with venous leg ulcers and test the hypothesis that patients who receive written information retain more knowledge than those who receive verbal information alone. METHOD: Twenty patients newly diagnosed with venous leg ulcers were recruited into this prospective trial. Patients were randomised either to the control group (given verbal information on their condition) or the intervention group (same verbal information and an information leaflet). The verbal information was in the same format as in the leaflet. Patients' knowledge of the condition was ascertained at an initial interview and at follow-up four to six weeks later. RESULTS: At follow-up both groups showed an overall improvement in knowledge, with no statistical difference between them. CONCLUSION: The results indicate there is limited value in providing information leaflets to this patient group, who were predominantly older patients with low levels of education. The relatively small sample size may explain the disappointing results. Further research may reveal a benefit of providing these leaflets to carers.
