Regulation of deoxycytidine kinase expression and sensitivity to gemcitabine by micro-RNA 330 and promoter methylation in cancer cells.

Deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) is essential for phosphorylation of natural deoxynucleosides and analogs, such as gemcitabine and cytarabine, two widely used anticancer compounds. Regulation of dCK is complex, including Ser-74 phosphorylation. We hypothesized that dCK could be regulated by two additional mechanisms: micro-RNA (miRNA) and promoter methylation. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) revealed methylation of the 3' GC box in three out of six cancer cell lines. The 3' GC box is located at the dCK promoter region. The methylation status was related to dCK mRNA expression. TargetScan and miRanda prediction algorithms revealed several possible miRNAs targeting dCK and identified miR-330 (micro-RNA 330) as the one conserved between the human, the chimpanzee, and the rhesus monkey genomes. Expression of miR-330 in various colon and lung cancer cell lines, as measured by QRT-PCR, varied five-fold between samples and correlated with in-vitro gemcitabine resistance (R = 0.82, p = 0.04). Exposure to gemcitabine also appeared to influence miR-330 levels in these cell lines. Furthermore, in our cell line panel, miR-330 expression negatively correlated with dCK mRNA expression (R = 0.74), suggesting a role of miR-330 in post-transcriptional regulation of dCK. In conclusion, the 3' GC box and miR-330 may regulate dCK expression in cancer cells.

Induction of resistance to the lipophilic cytarabine prodrug elacytarabine (CP-4055) in CEM leukemic cells.

The deoxynucleoside analogs cytarabine (Ara-C) and gemcitabine (dFdC) are widely used in the treatment of cancer. Due to their hydrophilic nature they need the equilibrative (hENT) and concentrative (hCNT) nucleoside transporters to enter the cell. To bypass drug resistance due to decreased uptake, lipophilic 5'elaidic acid esters were synthesized, elacytarabine (CP-4055, from ara-C) and CP-4126 (from gemcitabine), which are currently in clinical development for solid and hematological tumors. We investigated whether resistance can be induced in vitro, and treated the CEM leukemic cell line with weekly increasing elacytarabine concentrations, up to 0.28 microM (10 times IC(50)). The IC(50) of the resistant CEM/CP-4055 was 35 microM, about 1,000 times that of the wildtype CEM, and comparable to that of CEM/dCK- (deoxycytidine kinase deficient) (22 microM). CEM/CP-4055 was also cross-resistant to Ara-C, gemcitabine and CP-4126 (28 and 33 microM, respectively). A low level of mRNA dCK was observed, and similar to CEM/dCK-, CEM/CP-4055 did not accumulate Ara-CTP after exposure to Ara-C or elacytarabine, which is consistent with a deficiency in dCK. In conclusion, elacytarabine induced resistance similar to Ara-C. This resistance was caused by downregulation of dCK.

Methylation specific PCR to characterize methylation of the promoter of deoxycytidine kinase.

Deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) is essential for phosphorylation of natural deoxynucleosides and analogs, such as gemcitabine and cytarabine, two widely used anticancer compounds. We hypothesized that DNA methylation of SP1 binding sites in the dCK promoter region might affect dCK expression. Using methylation specific PCR (MSP), methylation was detected in one of the SP1 binding sites of the dCK promoter, in most tested cancer cell lines and in patient samples from brain tumors and leukemia. This SP1 site is a 3'GC box, which upon hypomethylation negatively regulates dCK mRNA expression. In conclusion, we developed a new MSP method showing methylation of the 3' GC-box in the dCK promoter region in tumor cells and patient samples. Methylation might therefore regulate transcription of dCK, and should be studied further to understand its role in influencing gemcitabine and cytarabine activity.

Cell cycle effects of fatty acid derivatives of cytarabine, CP-4055, and of gemcitabine, CP-4126, as basis for the interaction with oxaliplatin and docetaxel.

To bypass resistance due to limited entry into the cell derivatives of cytarabine (CP-4055, elacytarabine) and gemcitabine (CP-4126) containing a fatty acid chain at the 5' position of the nucleoside were developed. CP-4055 showed an increased retention of the active metabolite, the triphosphate. This characteristic was supposed to favor combinations, such as with the tubulin antagonist docetaxel, the platinum oxaliplatin and the antifolate pemetrexed. The role of the cell cycle effects of CP-4055 and CP-4126 on the efficacy of the combination with docetaxel or pemetrexed was determined. The combination of CP-4055 with oxaliplatin and docetaxel was also evaluated in a mouse xenograft model. CP-4055 induced a G2/M and S phase accumulation and CP-4126 an S phase accumulation. Both analogs induced a dose-dependent cell kill (apoptosis and necrosis). None of the docetaxel combinations induced a synergistic effect. The combination of docetaxel with CP-4055 or CP-4126 induced a G2/M accumulation in the A549 (lung cancer) cell line, but a G0/G1 accumulation in the WiDR (colon cancer) cell line. Preincubation with docetaxel induced an increased cell kill in both cell lines. The combination with oxaliplatin showed a synergistic effect in both cell lines. Combinations with pemetrexed were antagonistic in both cell lines. In the A549 cell line pemetrexed with CP-4055 led to an increase of the G0/G1 phase and the S phase. In WiDR the combination of pemetrexed with CP-4055 increased the G0/G1 phase and increased the cell kill. Pemetrexed with CP-4126 induced an increase in the G0/G1 phase and the S phase in the A549 cell line. In the xenograft study, on a colon cancer and a lung metastasis model, the combination of CP-4055 with docetaxel showed the best results. Treatment with CP-4055 followed by docetaxel after 4 h resulted in a reduction in metastasis in a lung metastasis model, and a favorable toxicity profile was observed. In conclusion, the combinations with oxaliplatin showed a synergistic effect in the combination studies. Although the combinations with docetaxel did not show an enhanced effect in the in vitro studies, this combination revealed an increased effect in the xenograft model.

Innovations and opportunities to improve conventional (deoxy)nucleoside and fluoropyrimidine analogs in cancer.

Many drugs that are currently used for the treatment of cancer have limitations, such as induction of resistance and/or poor biological half-life, which reduce their clinical efficacy. To overcome these limitations several strategies have been explored. Chemical modification by the attachment of lipophilic moieties to (deoxy)nucleoside analogs should enhance the plasma half live, change the biodistribution and improve cellular uptake of the drug. Attachment of a lipophilic moiety to a phosphorylated (deoxy)nucleoside analog will improve the activity of the drugs by circumventing the rate-limiting activation step of (deoxy)nucleoside analogs. Duplex and multiplex drugs consist of distinct active drugs with different mechanisms of action, which are linked to each other with either a lipid or a phosphodiester. Enzymatic cleavage of such a prodrug inside the cell releases the drug or the phosphorylated form of the drug. Antitumor activity of cytotoxic drugs can also be enhanced by the use of nanoparticles as carriers. Nanoparticles have the advantage of high stability, high carrier capacity, incorporation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic compounds and variable routes of administration. Encapsulating drugs in liposomes protects the drug against enzymatic breakdown in the plasma and makes it possible to get lipophilic compounds to the tumor site. Nanoparticles and liposomes can be used to target drugs either actively or passively to the tumor. In this review we discuss the considerable progress that has been made in increasing the efficacy of classic (deoxy)nucleoside and fluoropyrimidine compounds by chemical modifications and alternative delivery systems. We expect that combining different strategies could further increase the efficacy of these compounds.

Cell cycle effects and increased adduct formation by temozolomide enhance the effect of cytotoxic and targeted agents in lung cancer cell lines.

Temozolomide (TMZ) exerts its cytotoxic effects by methylating guanine in DNA, resulting in a mismatch with thymine. We studied possible enhancement of the cytotoxic activity of several other targeted drugs in four lung cancer cell lines by TMZ. the data are in relation to O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase (AGT) expression, gene methylation, cell cycle distribution and adduct formation. Synergism/additivity was found with O(6)-BG), gemcitabine, lonafarnib and paclitaxel, but not with platinum analogs and topoisomerase-inhibitors. O(6)-BG enhanced TMZ-induced accumulation in the G2/m-phase by increasing formation and retention of the O(6)-methyldeoxyguanosine adducts. TMZ combinations with drugs showing a different individual effect on the cell cycle (e.g. gemcitabine-induced S-phase) were most effective. The results show that O(6)-BG enhanced the TMZ effect in all cell lines. TMZ enhanced the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine, paclitaxel and lonafarnib in most cell lines, possibly by affecting the cell cycle, supporting possible application of TMZ in the treatment of lung cancer.

Troxacitabine prodrugs for pancreatic cancer.

Troxacitabine is a cytotoxic deoxycytidine analogue with an unnatural L-configuration, which is activated by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK). The configuration is responsible for differences in the uptake and metabolism of troxacitabine compared to other deoxynucleoside analogues. The main drawback in the use of most nucleoside anticancer agents originates from their hydrophilic nature, which property requires a high and frequent dosage for an intravenous administration. To overcome this problem several troxacitabine prodrugs modified in the aminogroup with a linear aliphatic chain with a higher lipophilicity were developed. To determine whether these prodrugs have an advantage over Troxacitabine pancreatic cancer cell lines were exposed to Troxacitabine and the lipophilic prodrugs. The addition of linear aliphatic chains to troxacitabine increased sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cell lines to the drug > 100-fold, possibly due to a better uptake and retention of the drug.

Cellular resistance against troxacitabine in human cell lines and pediatric patient acute myeloid leukemia blast cells.

Troxacitabine is a cytotoxic deoxycytidine analogue with an unnatural L-configuration, which is activated by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK). The configuration is responsible for differences in the uptake and metabolism of troxacitabine compared to other deoxynucleoside analogues. To determine whether troxacitabine has an advantage over other nucleoside analogues several cell lines resistant to cladribine and gemcitabine were exposed to troxacitabine, while blast cells from pediatric leukemia patients were tested for cross-resistance with other deoxynucleoside analogues. The gemcitabine resistant AG6000 (IC50: >3000 nM), and the cladribine resistant CEM (IC50: 150 nM) and HL-60 (IC50: >3000 nM) cell lines, all with no or decreased dCK expression, were less sensitive to troxacitabine than their wild type counterparts (IC50; A2780: 410, CEM: 71 and HL-60: 158 nM). dCK protein expression in CEM was higher than in HL-60, which, in turn, was higher than in A2780. Catalytically inactive p53 seems to increase the sensitivity to troxacitabine. The patient samples showed a large range of sensitivity to troxacitabine, similar to other deoxynucleoside analogues. Cross-resistance with all other deoxynucleoside analogues was observed.

Comparison of bleomycin and radiation in the G2 assay of chromatid breaks.

PURPOSE: To compare bleomycin with radiation in the G2 chromatid break assay. Controversy exists in the literature about whether G2 bleomycin chromatid-break sensitivity links with cancer predisposition in the same way as the G2 chromatid radiosensitivity test (the so-called 'G2 assay'). Although bleomycin is referred to as a 'radiomimetic' agent, it differs from radiation in the way the damage is induced. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Epstein-Barr virus-immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines from two head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients, two breast cancer patients, two ataxia-telangiectasia patients and two normal control persons were used. Chromosomal damage was determined in cells exposed to 0.3-Gy radiation or 5 mU ml(-1) bleomycin. The numbers of chromatid breaks per cell and of aberrations per cell (i.e. breaks and gaps) were determined. RESULTS: A strong positive correlation was found between the two different damage inducers (r=0.99; p<0.001). This correlation was similar for both the breaks per cell and the total aberrations per cell. Inclusion of gaps in the scoring of chromatid breaks was associated with a higher variability of the data, but this did not influence the outcome of this study. CONCLUSIONS: Both bleomycin and radiation give the same sensitivity phenotypes as determined by the G2 assay of chromatid breaks. Thus, when no radiation facility is present, bleomycin seems to be a good alternative to radiation for this type of assay.