ABSTRACT
Objectives: Surgery at large teaching hospitals is reportedly associated with more favourable outcomes. However, these results are not uniformly consistent across all surgical patients. This study aimed to assess potential disparities in clinical outcomes by hospital type for patients with intestinal obstruction. Material and Methods: 2018 NIS was queried for all adult non-elective admissions for intestinal obstruction. Hospitals were classified as either smallmedium non-teaching hospitals or large teaching hospitals. Multivariate regression analyses were used to assess the association between hospital type and inpatient mortality, access to surgery, admission duration, non-home discharges, hospital costs, and postoperative complications. Results: After adjustments, admission to large teaching hospitals was not associated with a reduction in inpatient mortality (AOR= 0.73; 95% CI= 0.41- 1.31; p= 0.29), lower likelihood of surgery (AOR= 0.93; 95% CI= 0.58-1.48; p= 0.76) or increased chance of early surgery (p= 0.97). Patients admitted to large teaching hospitals had shorter hospital stays (p= 0.002) and were less likely to be discharged to other acute care hospitals (AOR= 0.94; 95% CI= 0.80-0.94; p= 0.04). Admission to large teaching hospitals was not associated with a reduction in perioperative complications (AOR= 1.04; 95% CI= 0.80- 1.28; p= 0.91) or significantly higher hospital costs (mean increase= 1518; 95% CI= 1891-4927; p= 0.38). Conclusion: Admission to large teaching hospitals does not necessarily result in better patient outcomes. Merely considering the teaching status of the hospital in isolation cannot explain the diverse outcomes observed for this condition.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Frailty is reportedly associated with poorer outcomes among surgical patients. Using a coding-based frailty tool, we investigated the impact of frailty on clinical outcomes and resource utilization for urolithiasis hospitalizations. METHODS: A cohort study using the 2018 National Inpatient Sample database. All adult elective hospitalizations for urolithiasis were included in the study. The study population was categorized into FRAIL and non-frail (nFRAIL) cohorts using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty clusters. The association between frailty and clinical and financial outcomes was evaluated using multivariate regression models. RESULTS: About 1028 (14.9%) out of 6900 total hospitalizations were frail. Frailty was not associated with a significant increase in the odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.73, 95% CI 0.15-20.02) or length of hospital stay, but was associated with a lower chance of surgery within 24 h of admission (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.90, P = 0.008). A higher Charlson index was independently associated with an over 100% increase in the odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR 2.091, 95% CI 1.53-2.86, P < 0.001). Frail patients paid $15,993 higher in total hospital costs and had a higher likelihood of non-home discharges (aOR 4.29, 95% CI 2.74-6.71, P < 0.001) and peri-operative complications (aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.14-2.73, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Frailty was correlated with unfavorable outcomes, except mortality and prolonged hospital stay. Incorporating frailty evaluation into risk models has the potential to enhance patient selection and preparation for urolithiasis intervention.
