Visual Acuity Screening in North Indian Schools: Testing Accuracy and Cost of Alternate Screening Models.

PURPOSE: Our study compares the sensitivity, specificity and cost of visual acuity screening as performed by all class teachers (ACTs), selected teachers (STs) and vision technicians (VTs) in north Indian schools. METHODS: Prospective cluster randomized control studies are conducted in schools in a rural block and an urban-slum of north India. Consenting schools, with a minimum of 800 students aged 6 to 17 years, within a defined study region in both locations, were randomised into three arms: ACTs, STs or VTs. Teachers were trained to test visual acuity. Reduced vision was defined as unable to read equivalent of 20/30. Optometrists, who were masked to results of initial screening, examined all children. Costs were measured for all three arms. RESULTS: The number of students screened were 3410 in 9 ACT schools, 2999 in 9 ST schools and 3071 in 11 VT schools. Vision deficit was found in 214 (6.3%), 349 (11.6%) and 207 (6.7%), (p < .001) children in the ACT, ST and VT arms, respectively. The positive predictive value of VT screening for vision deficit (81.2%) was significantly higher than that of ACTs (42.5%) and STs (30.1%), (p < .001). VTs had significantly higher sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 98.7%, compared to ACTs (36.0% and 96.1%) and STs (44.3% and 91.2%). The cost of screening children with actual visual deficit by ACTs, STs and VTs, was found to be $9.35, $5.79 and $2.82 per child, respectively. CONCLUSION: Greater accuracy and lower cost favours school visual acuity screening by visual technicians in this setting, when they are available.

Interventions to improve utilization of cataract surgical services by girls: Case studies from Asia and Africa.

PURPOSE: Gender and blindness initiatives continue to make eye care personnel aware of the service utilization inequity strongly favouring men, yet interventions to reduce that inequity, particularly for girls, are under developed. METHODS: This descriptive study gathered quantitative data on the degree of gender equity at five Child Eye Health Tertiary Facilities (CEHTFs) in Asia and Africa and conducted in-depth interviews with eye care personnel to assess their strategies and capacity to reduce gender inequity. Cataract surgery was utilized to assess the degree of inequity and success of interventions to reduce inequity in case finding, service utilization, and follow-up. RESULTS: CEHTF administrative data showed significant gender inequity in cataract surgical services favouring boys in all settings. CEHTFs actively seek children through community and school-based outreach, yet do not have initiatives to reduce gender inequity. Little gender inequity was found among children receiving surgical and follow-up care, although two out of three children were boys. CEHTF staff, despite being aware, offered no effective means to reduce gender inequity involving cataract surgical services. Interventions that successfully increased service utilization by girls came from individual cases, involving extraordinary effort by a single eye care programme person. CONCLUSION: Community-based case finders such as Anganwadi workers in India, Female Community Health Volunteers (FCHVs) in Nepal, and Key Informants (KIs) in Africa are necessary to identify children in need of cataract services, but insufficient to increase service utilization by girls. Secondary, often extra-ordinary community-based interventions by eye care personnel are needed in all settings.