Comparison of two different bone anchored hearing instruments.

PURPOSE: To compare the audiological performances of Turkey's most up-to-date bone conduction implant processors. METHODS: Twenty-six bone-anchored hearing instrument users, thirteen in each group, were evaluated for speech understanding in quiet and several signal-to-noise ratios. RESULTS: We noticed the differences at 0.5 and 1 kHz measurements in free field frequency specific test, aided SRT scores, non-adaptive and adaptive matrix test results for a few conditions created a statistically significant difference in favor of Baha-6®. CONCLUSIONS: Both processors offer positive gains to their users in noisy and silent conditions. However, the data showed statistically significant differences for some measurements that may be critical for patients in daily practice.

The Relationship between Electrical Stapedius Reflex Thresholds and Behaviorally Most Comfortable Levels in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users.

OBJECTIVES: Programming the cochlear implant's speech processor with subjective methods in young, uncooperative children is difficult. Since young children cannot provide adequate feedback to the clinician, objective methods which do not require patient's response were often used. Electrical Stapedius Reflex Test is one of the most common procedures used. The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between electricalstapedius reflex thresholds and behaviorally most comfortable levels in experienced cochlear implant users. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients implanted with two brands of cochlear implants were compared in terms of electrical stapedius reflex thresholds versus most comfortable levels. Speech tests results were also compared between the two groups. 46 cochlear implanted patients who had at least 1 year of cochlear implant experience were included in the study. 28 patients were implanted with Nucleus, 18 patients with Med-El devices. RESULTS: Moderate correlations were obtained between Electrical Stapedius Reflex (ESR) thresholds and C levels in Nucleus users; higher correlations were obtained for Med-El patients. ESR thresholds were present at higher levels than MCL/C levels in both Nucleus and Med-El users. No significant difference was obtained between the two groups in terms of speech tests. CONCLUSION: ESR test can be very informative for programming young and uncooperative patients.

Comparison of two different bone anchored hearing instruments: Baha-5 vs Ponto-plus.

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, there is no study comparing Ponto Plus® (Oticon Medical AB, Askim, Sweden) and Baha® 5 (Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AG, Mölnlycke, Sweden) available in the literature. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to compare the performance of the Baha 5 with the Ponto Plus device in terms of speech understanding in quiet and in noise. In addition, to determine statistically whether or not the difference between the abutment systems created any variation in terms of skin reaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty bone-anchored hearing instrument users, ten in each group, were evaluated for speech understanding in quiet and several signal-to-noise ratios using the Turkish Matrix Test in a two-speaker setup. The Holger classifications were also reviewed to determine adverse skin reactions. RESULTS: It was revealed that the hearing results of both devices were similar and, when the skin reactions were compared, there was no statistically significant difference between the two-implant systems. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Because of the similar results of the groups, it can be interpreted as the key different device features such as the size, weight, colour alternatives, and the ease of use of the devices might be important in terms of device preference.