ABSTRACT
The idea of teaching science through music has undeniable appeal in implying that learning can be engaging and fun while also covering content efficiently. Indeed, there is little doubt that songs can be uniquely memorable, suggesting mnemonic options for core content. However, many classroom implementations of science music have limitations such as an overemphasis on rote memorization, rather than a constructivist building of understanding. In this brief review, we ask how music might facilitate the learning of science content in a manner consistent with the well-known pedagogical framework of Universal Design for Learning (UDL). In our view, UDL suggests certain distinct possible benefits of incorporating music into curricula, leading us to propose four models of practice. These four models are as follows: 1) students enjoy music together, 2) students critically analyze songs as texts, 3) students creatively augment existing songs, and 4) students create new songs. Model 1 can contribute to an inclusive learning environment, while models 2-4 can encourage cognitively rich active learning, and models 3-4 can additionally help students channel scientific understanding into the creation of authentic products. We conclude with comments on logistical issues that arise in implementing these four models, including the use of appropriate rubrics and the prioritization of artistic quality.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Instructors and students often find it fun to incorporate music into science classes. However, the casual usage of music in this context can unintentionally convey that science courses are mostly about memorizing scientific facts. In this article, the authors argue for a more nuanced approach to teaching science with music, rooted in Universal Design for Learning (UDL).
