Inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of asthma.

Cost estimates from developed countries indicate that asthma accounts for up to 2% of the economic cost of all diseases. A large proportion of asthma-related costs are attributable to poor asthma control. Treatment strategies which improve clinical outcomes in patients with asthma, therefore, have the potential for significant economic benefits, and it is important to evaluate new asthma therapies for cost effectiveness. Several studies have established that salmeterol and fluticasone propionate combined in a single dry powder inhalation device are at least as effective as a combination of the 2 drugs administered via separate dry powder inhalers and more effective than monotherapy with fluticasone propionate or budesonide. Importantly, pharmacoeconomic analysis of several of these studies show that the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination is cost effective relative to monotherapy with fluticasone propionate or budesonide. Although the total cost of asthma management tended to be slightly higher with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate than with inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy, in most cases mean cost-effectiveness ratios were lower (i.e. more favourable) for salmeterol/fluticasone propionate than either fluticasone propionate or budesonide. Cost effectiveness was assessed according to 3 end-points: successfully treated weeks, symptom-free days and episode-free days. Mean cost-effectiveness ratios consistently favoured salmeterol/fluticasone propionate over the comparator drug for the end-point successfully treated weeks, and in most cases the other 2 end-points also favoured the combination product over the comparator. In a further study, salmeterol/fluticasone was also less costly than therapy with formoterol and budesonide administered via 2 separate inhalers. Studies of health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire indicate that salmeterol/fluticasone propionate produces clinically meaningful improvements in overall HR-QOL relative to salmeterol monotherapy or placebo. Improvements in overall HR-QOL were statistically significantly greater for salmeterol/fluticasone propionate than with fluticasone propionate or budesonide alone, although the differences between treatments did not exceed the threshold for clinical significance. In conclusion, short term cost-effectiveness data show that salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is more cost effective than the inhaled corticosteroids budesonide and fluticasone propionate alone. The combination product also appears to improve HR-QOL relative to placebo or salmeterol alone.

Oxaliplatin: a review of its use in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer.

UNLABELLED: Oxaliplatin is a cytotoxic agent which, like other platinum compounds, acts primarily by causing inter- and intra-strand cross-links in DNA, thereby inhibiting DNA synthesis. Oxaliplatin has a bulky carrier ligand which is thought to enhance cytotoxicity and abolish cross-resistance between oxaliplatin and other platinum compounds. Phase II and III clinical trials have found oxaliplatin combined with fluorouracil/calcium folinate (leucovorin/folinic acid) to be an effective first- and second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. First-line triple therapy with oxaliplatin and fluorouracil/calcium folinate achieved significantly higher response rates than fluorouracil/calcium folinate alone in 2 phase III studies (objective response rates 59 vs 23% and 50.7 vs 22.3%). In addition, median progression-free survival was longer with triple therapy in both studies (8.9 vs 5.2 and 8.75 vs 6.0 months). However, there was no significant difference in median duration of survival between treatment groups, although this may be a consequence of the subsequent use of oxaliplatin and/or surgery in patients who relapsed during therapy with fluorouracil/calcium folinate alone. About 30 to 45% of patients (whose disease progressed during or after fluorouracil-based therapy) responded to second-line combination therapy with oxaliplatin and fluorouracil/calcium folinate. Median progression-free survival ranged from 7 to 10 months and the median duration of survival from 10 to 17 months. Objective responses were achieved in 20 and 24% of patients in 2 small trials of first-line oxaliplatin monotherapy and in about 10% of patients given the drug as a second-line option. Peripheral sensory neuropathy is the dose-limiting toxicity associated with oxaliplatin. Severe neurotoxicity has been estimated to occur in 10% of patients after 6 treatment cycles and in 50% after 9 cycles of an oxaliplatin dosage of 130 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks. It is cumulative, but reversible on discontinuation of therapy. Nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea are common, but are usually mild to moderate. Myelosuppression is also observed, but is usually mild. CONCLUSION: oxaliplatin is a promising treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It appears to be particularly advantageous (in terms of response rate and duration of progression-free survival) when used in combination with fluorouracil/calcium folinate as both a first- and second-line option, although preliminary studies have failed to show any survival advantage over fluorouracil/calcium folinate alone. Promising results have been found in studies of the drug as monotherapy, and oxaliplatin may also prove useful in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with unresectable liver metastases; however, data are limited at present.

Anastrozole. A review of its use in the management of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

UNLABELLED: Anastrozole is a new oral nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor indicated for the second-line endocrine treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. In postmenopausal women, anastrozole significantly reduces plasma estrogen levels; maximal suppression is achieved at dosages > or = 1 mg/day and levels remain suppressed during long term therapy. In two phase III clinical trials, anastrozole 1 or 10 mg/day showed similar clinical efficacy to that of oral megestrol (megestrol acetate) 160 mg/day in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Primary end-points [including time to disease progression (120 to 170 days) and overall response rates (complete and partial response and stable disease lasting > or = 24 weeks: 29 to 37%)] and secondary end-points [time to treatment failure (115 to 168 days) and duration of response (257 to 261 days)] did not differ significantly between treatment groups. However, a significant survival advantage was observed in patients treated with anastrozole 1 mg/day compared with megestrol in a follow-up combined analysis of patients enrolled in both studies (median time to death 26.7 vs 22.5 months). Quality of life parameters were generally improved to a similar extent in all treatment groups. Anastrozole is generally well tolerated in the majority of patients, the most common adverse events being gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances (incidence 29 to 33%). These events are generally mild or moderate and transient. Other adverse events reported with anastrozole include headache (< or = 18%), asthenia (< or = 16%), pain (< or = 15%), hot flushes and bone pain (both < or = 12%), back pain and dyspnoea (both < or = 11%) and peripheral oedema (< or = 9%). GI disturbance tended to be more common with anastrozole than megestrol, particularly at the 10 mg/day dosage; however, compared with megestrol, anastrozole is less frequently associated with weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: Anastrozole, with its apparent survival advantage versus megestrol (demonstrated in a combined analysis of phase III studies), convenient once daily oral administration and acceptable short term tolerability profile, is a second-line treatment option for postmenopausal patients with tamoxifenrefractory advanced breast cancer. The results of ongoing comparative trials with tamoxifen will determine the relative efficacy of anastrozole as first-line endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer and as adjuvant therapy for early disease. In addition, direct comparative studies are required to determine the efficacy of anastrozole relative to that of other oral aromatase inhibitors such as letrozole and vorozole.

Edrecolomab (monoclonal antibody 17-1A).

Edrecolomab is a mouse-derived monoclonal IgG2a antibody. It recognises the human tumour-associated antigen CO17-1A which is expressed on the cell surface of a wide variety of tumours and normal epithelial tissue. Edrecolomab is thought to destroy tumour cells by activating an array of endogenous cytotoxic mechanisms, including antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and possibly antibody-dependent complement-mediated cytotoxicity. Edrecolomab may induce antitumour activity indirectly by inducing a host anti-idiotypic antibody response. Adjuvant therapy with edrecolomab (500 mg initial dose followed by four 100 mg infusions administered at 4-weekly intervals) significantly improved survival and reduced the tumour recurrence rate in patients with resected Dukes' stage C colorectal cancer and minimal residual disease. Data from several small clinical trials suggest that edrecolomab given as monotherapy or in combination with other antineoplastic agents has limited efficacy in the treatment of advanced colorectal or pancreatic tumours. However, results from a small phase I study in patients with advanced breast cancer were more promising. Edrecolomab was generally well tolerated in clinical trials. In a postmarketing surveillance study, the most common adverse events associated with edrecolomab were flushing/erythema and gastrointestinal symptoms including diarrhoea, abdominal pain and nausea and vomiting. Because edrecolomab is of murine origin, anaphylactic reactions have developed in some patients treated with the drug.

Amprenavir.

Amprenavir is a viral protease inhibitor with specificity for the HIV protease enzyme. The resistance profile of amprenavir appears to differ from that of other protease inhibitors such as saquinavir and indinavir. Twelve hours after single-dose administration of amprenavir 1200mg to HIV-infected individuals, the mean plasma concentration of the drug was more than 10-fold greater than the 50% inhibitory concentration for HIV-1IIIB in peripheral blood lymphocytes. In a small nonblind study, amprenavir monotherapy increased CD4+ cell count and decreased viral load in 37 patients with HIV infection and no previous exposure to protease inhibitor therapy. Combination therapy comprising amprenavir and other antiretroviral agents (abacavir, zidovudine, lamivudine, indinavir, saquinavir or nelfinavir) decreased viral load and increased CD4+ cell counts in patients with HIV infection. Antiviral efficacy was maintained during up to 24 weeks' follow-up. Available data suggest that rash, headache and diarrhoea or loose stools are the most frequent adverse events associated with amprenavir therapy.

Tiagabine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential in the management of epilepsy.

Tiagabine is a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) uptake inhibitor which is structurally related to nipecotic acid but has an improved ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Clinical trials have shown that tiagabine is effective as add-on therapy in the management of patients with refractory partial epilepsy. In short term studies of this indication, tiagabine < or = 64 mg/day for 7 to 12 weeks reduced the complex partial and simple partial seizure frequency by > or = 50% in 8 to 31 and 28.2 to 37% of patients, respectively. Tiagabine appeared to produce a sustained reduction in seizure frequency in studies of up to 12 months' duration. Data from preliminary studies are currently insufficient to confirm the usefulness of tiagabine when used as monotherapy or in the treatment of children with epilepsy. Further studies are, therefore, necessary to more fully elucidate the efficacy of the drug in these settings. Adverse events associated with tiagabine are primarily CNS-related and include dizziness, asthenia, nonspecific nervousness and tremor. Skin rash or psychosis occurred with similar frequencies among tiagabine- and placebo-treated patients. With long term administration (> or = 1 year for many patients), the profile and incidence of adverse events was similar to that for short term therapy. Tiagabine does not appear to affect the hepatic metabolism of other drugs such as carbamazepine and phenytoin. Possible disadvantages of tiagabine include its short plasma elimination half-life, necessitating 2 to 4 times daily administration, and its inducible hepatic metabolism. Thus, tiagabine is a new antiepileptic agent with a novel mechanism of action, which has demonstrated efficacy in the adjunctive treatment of patients with refractory partial epilepsy. Further investigation of the efficacy of tiagabine is expected to provide a clearer definition of its place in the treatment of epilepsy and its relative merits in relation to other antiepileptic drugs.

Brimonidine. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical potential in the management of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Brimonidine is a highly selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist which reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) by reducing aqueous humour production and increasing aqueous humour outflow via the uveoscleral pathway. Brimonidine is indicated for the topical management of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. In 3 large comparative studies in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, the ocular hypotensive efficacy of brimonidine was maintained during treatment periods of up to 1 year. Mean reductions in peak (measured 2 hours after the morning dose) and trough (measured 12 hours after the evening dose) IOP were 5.6 to 5.9 and 3.3 to 3.7 mm Hg, respectively, after 3 or 12 months of treatment with brimonidine 0.2% twice daily. The efficacy of brimonidine in this setting was similar to that of timolol 0.5% twice daily at peak only (-6.0mm Hg), and superior to that of betaxolol 0.25% twice daily at both peak (-3.5mm Hg) and trough (-2.7mm Hg). When added to topical beta-adrenoceptor antagonist therapy, initial results showed brimonidine 0.2% twice daily to have additive ocular hypotensive efficacy similar to that of pilocarpine 2% 3 times daily. Thus, brimonidine 0.2% may be a useful adjunct in this setting. According to combined data from 2 large comparative studies, the most frequent adverse events associated with brimonidine therapy were oral dryness (30.0% of patients), ocular hyperaemia (26.3%) and ocular burning and/or stinging (24.0%). Ocular allergic reactions including allergic blepharitis, blepharoconjunctivitis and follicular conjunctivitis occurred with an incidence of 9.6% in 1 study. In a third comparative study, the incidence of adverse events associated with brimonidine therapy was lower, with conjunctival hyperaemia (11.4%) the most frequently reported event. Changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and, to a lesser extent, heart rate have been reported in patients treated with therapeutic doses of topical brimonidine for up to 12 months, but these changes were not clinically significant. Unlike beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, brimonidine is not contraindicated in patients with cardiopulmonary disease, although it should be used with caution in individuals with severe cardiovascular disease. Thus, further studies are warranted to determine the efficacy of brimonidine when used in combination with other glaucoma medications and its efficacy relative to newer drugs such as dorzolamide and latanoprost. However, available data suggest that brimonidine is a promising alternative option for the lowering of IOP in the management of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension, particularly in patients with cardiopulmonary disease in whom topical beta-adrenoceptor antagonist therapy is contraindicated.

Zafirlukast. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in the management of asthma.

Zafirlukast is a competitive and selective leukotriene receptor antagonist indicated for the prophylaxis and treatment of chronic asthma. The rationale for the development of leukotriene antagonists was based on in vitro and in vivo data demonstrating the extensive role of the cysteinyl leukotrienes C4 (LTC4), D4 (LTD4) and E4 (LTE4) in the pathogenesis of asthma. Initial data have demonstrated an improvement in pulmonary function and symptom control and a reduction in the use of short-acting inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist therapy in patients with mild to moderate asthma treated with oral zafirlukast at the recommended dosage of 20 mg twice daily. Available data also suggest that zafirlukast may significantly reduce the incidence of asthma exacerbations. Data on the comparative efficacy of zafirlukast and existing antiasthma medications are limited. Results from 2 double-blind randomised studies comparing zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily with sodium cromoglycate aerosol or dry powder inhalation reported similar efficacy for both drugs. In a comparison with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (0.2 to 0.25 mg twice daily), improvements in morning peak expiratory flow rate, forced expiratory volume in 1 second and daytime symptom score were significantly less with zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily for 6 weeks. However, available data suggest that patient compliance and patient preference may be greater with oral zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily than with twice-daily inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Confounding results from 2 studies preclude any clear conclusions regarding the potential steroid-sparing effect of zafirlukast at the recommended dosage of 20 mg twice daily. Furthermore, Churg-Strauss syndrome has been reported in 6 patients who were being withdrawn from oral corticosteroid therapy while receiving treatment with oral zafirlukast. It is, therefore, recommended that zafirlukast-treated patients who require a reduction in their oral corticosteroid therapy are closely monitored. Zafirlukast is generally well tolerated. Reports of elevated liver enzymes in patients receiving high dosages of zafirlukast (80 mg twice daily) preclude the use of dosages exceeding 40 mg twice daily. Careful monitoring is necessary in zafirlukast-treated patients receiving concomitant therapy with drugs such as warfarin, terfenadine and erythromycin because of the potential for drug interactions. Thus, zafirlukast is a potentially useful addition to current antiasthma therapies in patients with mild to moderate asthma. Because zafirlukast is administered orally, it may be particularly beneficial in patients poorly compliant with asthma therapy as a result of poor inhaler technique. Further investigation of the efficacy of zafirlukast is expected to more clearly define its position in the management of asthma.

Efavirenz.

Efavirenz is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) which shows good inhibitory activity against HIV-1. Reduced susceptibility to efavirenz has been reported with HIV-1 variants containing single and multiple mutations to the reverse transcriptase enzyme. In vitro and in vivo data suggest that the resistance profile of efavirenz overlaps with that of the NNRTIs nevirapine and delavirdine. Clinically significant drug interactions have been reported with efavirenz and indinavir and saquinavir. An increase in dosage of indinavir from 800 to 1000 mg 3 times daily is recommended during coadministration with efavirenz. Use of efavirenz in combination with saquinavir as the sole protease inhibitor is not recommended. Once-daily efavirenz in combination with zidovudine plus lamivudine or indinavir or nelfinavir increased CD4+ cell counts and reduced HIV RNA plasma levels to below quantifiable levels (< 400 copies/ml) in HIV-infected patients. A sustained reduction in viral load was maintained for at least 72 weeks in 1 study. Nervous system symptoms (including headache, dizziness, insomnia and fatigue) and dermatological effects (including maculopapular rash) appear to be the most common adverse events reported with efavirenz-containing antiretroviral regimens.

Letrozole. A review of its use in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

UNLABELLED: Letrozole is an oral reversible nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor. Clinical tracer studies show that it inhibits peripheral aromatase by over 98% and suppresses blood and urinary estrogen levels by over 95% after 2 weeks of treatment in postmenopausal women. Letrozole also significantly inhibits intratumoral aromatase in vivo. The action of letrozole appears to be selective for aromatase; long term administration did not affect basal levels of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone or aldosterone, although slight decreases in cortisol levels were observed in 2 studies, these did not appear to be clinically significant. In 2 phase IIb/III trials, letrozole 2.5 mg/day achieved objective response rates of 19.5 and 23.6% which were sustained for a median duration of 24 and 33 months, respectively. The median duration of response compared favourably with both comparator agents, aminoglutethimide and megestrol (15 and 18 months, respectively), as did objective response rates (12.4 and 16.4%). Letrozole 2.5 mg/day was associated with an increase in median survival time of 8 and 3 months compared with aminoglutethimide and megestrol, respectively. According to analyses of overall function, letrozole 2.5 mg/day was significantly superior to both comparators with respect to duration of response and aminoglutethimide with respect to survival. Letrozole has a good short term tolerability profile. The adverse events reported most commonly in association with letrozole 2.5 mg/day in the 2 phase IIb/III trials were headache (1.1 and 7%), nausea (6 and 10.3%), fatigue (3.2 and 5%), hot flushes (4.9 and 5%) and peripheral oedema (6%). Events were usually mild to moderate in severity; adverse events necessitated discontinuation of treatment in 3% of letrozole 2.5 mg/day recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Letrozole, in common with vorozole and anastrozole, offers greater selectivity and potency of aromatase inhibition than the prototype aromatase inhibitor, aminoglutethimide, and can be administered once daily. Available clinical data suggest that letrozole achieves a significantly longer duration of response than megestrol and aminoglutethimide and longer overall survival than aminoglutethimide. However, direct comparisons are required to distinguish between the newer aromatase inhibitors. For this reason, letrozole should be recommended as a second-line treatment in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer whose disease has progressed on or failed to respond to antiestrogen therapy.

Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine: a review of its immunogenicity and protective efficacy against hepatitis B.

UNLABELLED: Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine Engerix B((R)) [Hep-B(Eng)] is a noninfectious subunit hepatitis B viral vaccine indicated for the active immunisation of adults, children and infants against hepatitis B virus infection. It contains hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) which is produced by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by use of recombinant DNA technology. In adults and children seroprotection rates [anti-HBsAg antibody (anti-HBs) titres >or=10 IU/L] were 93 to 100% 1 month after completion of the immunisation schedule with Hep-B(Eng) [0, 1, 6-month schedule]. A more rapid immunological response has been reported with accelerated Hep-B(Eng) immunisation schedules, such as the 0, 1, 2, 12-month schedule. Hep-B(Eng) produces seroprotection rates similar to those achieved with the plasma-derived vaccines and the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine, Recombivax-HB((R)) [Hep-B(Rax)] when administered at recommended doses. In studies in Taiwanese and Thai neonates born to hepatitis B carrier mothers, seroprotection rates were >or=94% 12 months after immunisation with Hep-B(Eng) [+/- hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG)] and protective efficacy was high, with

Lepirudin: a review of its potential place in the management of thrombotic disorders.

UNLABELLED: Lepirudin is a recombinant hirudin derived from transfected yeast cells. The hirudins are direct thrombin inhibitors which render the thrombin molecule incapable of promoting fibrin formation and catalysing other haemostatic reactions. In initial studies, parenteral lepirudin has shown promising efficacy as an antithrombotic agent. Lepirudin increased or maintained platelet counts at normal baseline values while maintaining adequate anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and has not been associated with the development of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. Preliminary studies in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) suggest that lepirudin may be more effective than unfractionated heparin (UFH) at preventing pulmonary perfusion defects. In patients with unstable angina pectoris, preliminary data also showed lepirudin to be significantly more effective than UFH according to the combined incidence of cardiovascular mortality, new acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or refractory angina. However, additional studies involving larger patient numbers are necessary before firm conclusions can be made regarding the relative efficacy of lepirudin in these indications. Similarly, promising but limited data on the use of lepirudin during haemodialysis or heart surgery and in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) require further confirmation. Bleeding complications and the possible induction of allergic or anaphylactic reactions are the most serious adverse events associated with lepirudin therapy. Major bleeding complication rates appear to be similar with lepirudin and UFH monotherapy; however, lepirudin may be associated with an increased incidence of minor bleeding including bruising. Initial encouraging results showing an improvement in coronary artery patency with high-dose lepirudin versus UFH as an adjunct to thrombolytic therapy in patients with AMI were subsequently overshadowed by reports of a high incidence of major bleeding events including cerebral haemorrhage among lepirudin recipients. Moreover, at lower doses which did not produce an unacceptably high incidence of haemorrhagic complications, lepirudin appeared to have only a small efficacy advantage over UFH. CONCLUSIONS: Lepirudin has shown promising activity as an antithrombotic agent and may be a suitable substitute anticoagulant for heparin in patients with HIT. The narrow therapeutic window of lepirudin makes it difficult to assess the role of this agent when used as an adjunct to thrombolytic therapy in patients with AMI. However, initial data suggest that lepirudin may be a potentially useful agent in the management of patients with unstable angina, DVT or DIC and in preventing thrombus formation in extracorporeal circuits. Further studies should more fully elucidate the efficacy of lepirudin in these indications.

Micronised fenofibrate: a review of its pharmacodynamic properties and clinical efficacy in the management of dyslipidaemia.

Micronised fenofibrate is a new formulation of the fibric acid derivative fenofibrate. It is indicated for the treatment of patients with type IIa, IIb, III or IV dyslipidaemia who have failed to respond to dietary control or other nonpharmacological interventions. Micronised fenofibrate has improved absorption characteristics compared with the standard preparation, allowing a lower daily dosage and once-daily administration. The lipid-modifying profile of micronised fenofibrate is characterised by a decrease in low density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol levels, a marked reduction in elevated plasma triglyceride levels and an increase in high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. Consistent with the standard formulation, which is administered as 300mg daily in divided doses, the micronised preparation has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of type IIa, IIb and IV primary dyslipidaemias but at a lower daily dosage of 200mg once daily. Because of its significant triglyceride-lowering effect, micronised fenofibrate appears to be of greatest benefit in patients with hypertriglyceridaemia (with or without hypercholesterolaemia), including patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia. In the comparisons available, micronised fenofibrate 200mg once daily was of similar efficacy to or less effective than the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors simvastatin 20mg daily and pravastatin 20mg daily at reducing LDL and total cholesterol levels. However micronised fenofibrate produced greater improvements in triglyceride and, generally, HDL cholesterol levels than both simvastatin and pravastatin. Data on the long term tolerability of micronised fenofibrate are limited. However, data from a large short term (3-month) study have indicated that gastrointestinal disorders are the most frequent adverse events associated with therapy. Elevations in serum transaminase and creatine phosphokinase levels have been reported rarely with micronised fenofibrate. In conclusion, available data suggest that the more convenient lower once-daily dosage of micronisedfeno fibrate retains the beneficial lipid-modifying effects of the standard formulation. Further studies are required to determine whether the lipid changes achieved with micronised fenofibrate result in a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Salmeterol. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of children with asthma.

Salmeterol xinafoate is a selective beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist indicated for the maintenance treatment of adults and children with asthma. When administered as a dry powder or aerosol, salmeterol produces bronchodilation for at least 12 hours and protects against methacholine and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Salmeterol is not recommended for the treatment of acute exacerbations of asthma. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of inhaled salmeterol in the management of asthma in children. Salmeterol improved symptom control and lung function more effectively than placebo or regularly administered salbutamol. In children who were symptomatic despite regular inhaled corticosteroid therapy, the addition of salmeterol to treatment produced a significant improvement in morning and evening peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and a significant reduction in the incidence of asthma exacerbations compared with placebo. Notably, the long duration of action of salmeterol makes it particularly suitable for the prevention of nocturnal asthma symptoms and exercise-induced asthma (EIA) in children. Current data suggest that salmeterol should not be used as a substitute for corticosteroid therapy in children, but rather as an adjunct to therapy. Thus, salmeterol may be a suitable adjunct to therapy in children with asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroids. In addition, salmeterol also has a potentially important role in the prevention of EIA and nocturnal asthma symptoms.

Fludarabine. An update of its pharmacology and use in the treatment of haematological malignancies.

Fludarabine is an antineoplastic agent which has been studied in patients with a variety of lymphoproliferative malignancies. Clinical evidence from comparative studies in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) suggests that fludarabine is at least as effective as CAP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone) or CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and prednisone) in previously treated or chemotherapy-naive patients and significantly more effective than chlorambucil in terms of response rate and duration and survival in chemotherapy-naive patients. Promising results have also been reported with fludarabine-based combination therapy in the treatment of patients with CLL. In addition, sequential therapy with fludarabine and cytarabine has demonstrated good efficacy in the treatment of acute leukaemias, as has fludarabine monotherapy and combination therapy in low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. A favourable cytoreductive response has been reported in patients with lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma and in a smaller number of patients with cutaneous T cell lymphomas, CLL of T cell origin or prolymphocytic leukaemia. Recent data also support the use of fludarabine, either as a component of a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen or in the attainment of minimal residual disease, in patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow transplantation. The tolerability profile of fludarabine is similar to that of CAP, with the most common adverse events being granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia and infection. Alopecia and nausea/vomiting appear to be less frequent with fludarabine therapy than with CAP although the development of immune cytopenias is more frequent with fludarabine. Severe neurotoxicity has been reported with fludarabine but this is mostly confined to the use of high doses. Clinical experience therefore indicates that fludarabine is an effective and generally well-tolerated antineoplastic agent for the second-line treatment of advanced CLL. Recent data from comparative studies also support the earlier use of fludarabine in the treatment of chemotherapy-naive patients with CLL. Furthermore, results of available studies are increasingly highlighting an important future role for fludarabine in the treatment of acute leukaemias and low grade NHL and possibly other lymphoproliferative disorders, particularly when used as a component of combination chemotherapy.

Zalcitabine. An update of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy in the management of HIV infection.

Zalcitabine is a dideoxynucleoside antiretroviral agent that is phosphorylated to the active metabolite 2',3'-dideoxycytidine 5'-triphosphate (ddCTP) within both uninfected and HIV-infected cells. At therapeutic concentrations, ddCTP inhibits HIV replication by inhibiting the enzyme reverse transcriptase and terminating elongation of the proviral DNA chain. The results of 3 large pivotal trials comparing zidovudine monotherapy with combination therapy have now clearly established that zalcitabine plus zidovudine combination with an improvement in viral load and CD4+ cell count compared with zidovudine monotherapy. More recently, clinical end-point and surrogate marker data have established the efficacy of zalcitabine in combination with the protease inhibitor saquinavir in zidovudine-experienced patients. Other studies have demonstrated the utility of zalcitabine in combination with ritonavir and the nucleoside analogue lamivudine. Importantly, early use of zalcitabine in the treatment sequence does not appear to limit the therapeutic efficacy of subsequent therapy with other nucleoside analogues such as lamivudine. Peripheral neuropathy is the most frequent dose-limiting adverse effect associated with zalcitabine therapy and is generally reversible on discontinuation of treatment. Stomatitis and mouth ulcers may occur frequently with zalcitabine therapy but tend to resolve with continuing treatment. Haematological toxicity, which is a common adverse effect associated with zidovudine, is reported infrequently with zalcitabine. Overall, combination therapy with zalcitabine plus zidovudine or saquinavir has been shown to have a tolerability profile comparable to that of either agent alone, although treatment with zidovudine plus zalcitabine was associated with a significant increase in the incidence of haematological toxicity compared with zidovudine monotherapy in one study. Therefore, current data suggest that zalcitabine is a useful antiretroviral agent for inclusion as a component of initial double combination therapy with zidovudine or as part of triple combination therapy including zidovudine plus a protease inhibitor in the management of patients with HIV infection.

Familial abdominal wall defects.

We report 2 families, each having multiple sibs with abdominal wall defects. In family 1, normal parents gave birth to identical (monochorionic, diamniotic) twins. This is the first reported case of gastroschisis occurring in monozygotic twins. In family 2, a normal mother gave birth to a son with omphalocele. Two subsequent pregnancies with a different husband resulted in a stillborn girl with partial atresia of the colon and a liveborn girl with gastroschisis. In neither case were there any associated anomalies. In neither of the 2 families was there consanguinity or history of other abdominal wall defects. The familial occurrence of these defects suggests that 1) multifactorial determination should be considered in at least some cases of abdominal wall defects, 2) the bowel atresias that occasionally accompany gastroschisis may also have a genetic (multifactorial) cause, and 3) some cases of gastroschisis and omphalocele may have the same genetic cause.

Neurofibromatosis and childhood tumors.

Although tumors are a known complication of von Recklinghausen's neurofibromatosis (NF), they often develop after the second decade and their characteristics in the pediatric population are unclear. To define the frequency and distribution of tumor types in children with NF, the authors reviewed the experience at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh between 1953 and 1984. During that time, 121 children younger than 18 years with documented NF were seen. Three patients (2.5%) developed locally extensive, unresectable sarcomas, two of which were clearly neural in origin. Two other children died from complications of highly cellular but not histologically malignant neurofibromas. Seventeen patients (14%) had brain tumors, of which 3 (2.5%) were malignant astrocytomas and 9 were optic gliomas. Two children had acute myelogenous leukemia. Although it has been said that patients with NF are particularly susceptible to the oncogenic effects of radiation, 12 children were treated with a median of 5000 rad to their tumor bed. Follow-up after radiation in that small cohort of patients ranged from 6 months to 12 years (mean, 6 years). Eleven of 12 patients experienced adequate local control. During the follow-up period, none developed a second tumor outside or within the radiation port that could be related to radiation. The authors conclude that clinically significant tumors in children with NF, not all of which are histologically malignant, are not rare. Although more prospective information is needed on response to and sequelae from therapy, the data in this report suggest no contraindication to aggressive therapy.

Incarcerated congenital diaphragmatic hernias with bowel obstruction (Bochdalek).

Incarcerated congenital diaphragmatic hernias are a rare cause of bowel obstruction in children. In the past 3 yr, we have treated three such diaphragmatic hernias: the first incarcerated and strangulated requiring bowel resection while the other two were incarcerated only. The difficulty in diagnosing this condition in illustrated by these cases. In all children with the triad of upper respiratory illness (URI) or infiltrate on chest x-ray, vomiting, and x-ray evidence of bowel obstruction, the diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) with incarceration and bowel obstruction should be entertained.