Illicit drug and alcohol use and measures of musculoskeletal function and mental health in orthopaedic trauma patients.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe the relationship between positive toxicology screens and measures of preinjury mental health and physical function in an orthopaedic trauma population. Design: This was a cross-sectional study. Setting: Urban Level 1 trauma center. Patients: A total of 125 trauma patients gave written consent for this study. Main Outcome Measurements: Questionnaires such as, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, General Anxiety Disorder-7, PCL-5, and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment, were used to survey patients after surgical intervention. Results: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (P = 0.05) and PCL-5 (P = 0.04) were not found to have significant differences between positive and negative toxicology screens. Both General Anxiety Disorder-7 (P = 0.004) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment function (P = 0.006) were significantly higher in patients with positive toxicology screens. Conclusions: Positive toxicology seems to be associated with preinjury anxiety. Patient reported preinjury function was not adversely affected by the presence of illicit substances or alcohol, nor were levels of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression found to be higher in patients with positive toxicology screens. Level of Evidence: Level IV Cross-Sectional Study.

Risk Factors for Secondary Revision After Finger Amputations.

BACKGROUND: Digit amputations are relatively simple and are often performed in the setting of trauma or infection. However, it is not uncommon for digit amputations to undergo secondary revision due to complications or patient dissatisfaction. Identifying factors associated with secondary revision may alter treatment strategy. We hypothesize that the secondary revision rate is affected by digit, initial level of amputation, and comorbidities. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients undergoing digit amputations in operating rooms at our institution from 2011 to 2017. Secondary revision amputations were defined as a separate return to the operating room following initial surgical amputation, excluding emergency room amputations. Patient demographics, comorbidities, level of amputation, and complications were collected. RESULTS: In all, 278 patients were included with a total of 386 digit amputations and mean follow-up of 2.6 months. Three hundred twenty-six primary digit amputations were performed in 236 patients (group A). Sixty digits were secondarily revised in 42 patients (group B). The secondary revision rate was 17.8% for patients and 15.5% for digits. Patients with heart disease and diabetes mellitus were associated with secondary revision, with wound complications being the leading indication overall (73.8%). Medicare covered 52.4% of patients in group B versus 30.1% in group A (P = .005). CONCLUSION: Risk factors for secondary revision include Medicare insurance, comorbidities, previous digit amputations, and initial amputation of either the index finger or the distal phalanx. These data may serve as a prediction model to aid surgical decision-making by identifying patients at risk of secondary revision amputation.

Does Hospital Volume Affect Outcomes in Spine Surgeries? A Systematic Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of hospital volume on postoperative outcomes in spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several strategies have recently been proposed to optimize provider outcomes, such as regionalization to higher volume centers and setting volume benchmarks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review examining the association between hospital volume and spine surgery outcomes. To be included in the review, the study population had to include patients undergoing a primary or revision spinal procedure. These included anterior/posterior cervical fusions, anterior/posterior lumbar fusions, laminectomies, discectomies, spinal deformity surgeries, and surgery for spinal malignancies. We searched the Pubmed, OVID MEDLINE (1966-2018), Google Scholar, and Web of Science (1900-2018) databases in January 2018 using the search criteria ("Hospital volume" OR "volume" OR "volume-outcome" OR "volume outcome") AND ("spine" OR "spine surgery" OR "lumbar" OR "cervical" OR "decompression" OR "deformity" OR "fusions"). There were no restrictions placed on study design, publication date, or language. The studies were evaluated with respect to the quality of methodology as outlined by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the review. Studies were variable in defining hospital volume thresholds. Higher hospital volume was associated with statistically significant lower risks of postoperative complications, a shorter length of stay, lower cost of hospital stay, and a lower risk of readmissions and reoperations/revisions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a trend toward better outcomes for higher volume hospitals; however, further study needs to be carried out to define objective volume thresholds for specific spine surgeries for hospitals to use as a marker of proficiency.

Preoperative Shoulder Injections Are Associated With Increased Risk of Revision Rotator Cuff Repair.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine whether the timing of preoperative shoulder injections is associated with an increased risk of revision rotator cuff repair following primary rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of claims data of privately insured subjects from the MarketScan database for the years 2010 to 2014 was conducted. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare the odds of reoperation between groups. Laterality for the injection, index procedure, and subsequent surgery were verified for all subjects. RESULTS: A total of 4,959 subjects with an arthroscopic RCR were identified, 392 of whom required revision RCR within the following 3 years. Patients who had an injection within 6 months preceding the index surgery were at a much higher risk of undergoing reoperation for revision RCR: 0 to 3 months prior, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.375 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.027-1.840); 3 to 6 months prior, AOR 1.822 (95% CI, 1.290-2.573); and 6 to 12 months prior, AOR 1.237 (95% CI, 0.787-1.943). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had received an injection within 6 months prior to RCR were much more likely to undergo a revision cuff repair within the following 3 years. The risk of reoperation significantly declines if there is more than 6 months between injection and RCR. Consideration should be given to minimizing preoperative injections in patients requiring RCR or delaying primary RCR for 6 months following injection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.