Spine Injuries Sustained After Falls While Crossing the U.S.-Mexico Border.

This study is to report the demographics, incidence, and patterns of spinal injuries associated with border crossings resulting from a fall from a significant height. A retrospective cohort study was performed at a Level I trauma center from January 2016 to December 2021 to identify all patients who fell from a significant height while traversing the U.S.-Mexico border and were subsequently admitted. A total of 448 patients were identified. Of the 448 patients, 117 (26.2%) had spine injuries and 39 (33.3%) underwent operative fixation. Females had a significantly higher incidence of spine injuries (60% vs. 40%; p < 0.00330). Patients with a spine fracture fell from a higher median fall height (6.1 vs. 4.6 m; p < 0.001), which resulted in longer median length of stay (LOS; 12 vs. 7 days; p < 0.001), greater median Injury Severity Score (ISS; 20 vs. 9; p < 0.001), and greater relative risk (RR) of ISS >15 (RR = 3.2; p < 0.001). Patients with operative spine injuries had significantly longer median intensive care unit (ICU) LOS than patients with non-operative spine injuries (4 vs. 2 days; p < 0.001). Patients with spinal cord injuries and ISS >15 sustained falls from a higher distance (median 6.1 vs. 5.5 m) and had a longer length of ICU stay (median 3 vs. 0 days). All patients with operative spine injuries had an ISS >15 relative to 50% of patients with non-operative spine injuries (median ISS 20 vs. 15; p < 0.001). Patients with spine trauma requiring surgery had a higher incidence of head (RR = 3.5; p 0.0353) and chest injuries (RR = 6.0; p = 0.0238), but a lower incidence of lower extremity injuries (RR = 0.5; p < 0.001). Thoracolumbar injuries occurred in 68.4% of all patients with spine injuries. Patients with operative spine injuries had a higher incidence of burst fracture (RR = 15.5; p < 0.001) and flexion-distraction injury (RR = 25.7; p = 0.0257). All patients with non-operative spine injuries had American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) D or E presentations, and patients with operative spine injuries had a higher incidence of spinal cord injury: ASIA D or lower at time of presentation (RR = 6.3; p < 0.001). Falls from walls in border crossings result in significant injuries to the head, spine, long bones, and body, resulting in polytrauma casualties. Falls from higher height were associated with a higher frequency and severity of spinal injuries, greater ISS, and longer ICU length of stay. Operative spine injuries, compared with non-operative spine injuries, had longer ICU length of stay, greater ISS, and different fracture morphology. Spine surgeons and neurocritical care teams should be prepared to care for injuries associated with falls from height in this unique population.

Injuries Sustained With Falls From Height in Crossing the United States-Mexico Border at a Level I Trauma Center: A Prospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: The US Department of Homeland Security has reported increases in encounters and apprehensions at the US Southwest border for the past several years. The purposes of this study were to assess the demographics, patterns of injuries, and surgical interventions, associated with falls from height along the US-Mexico border. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted at a Level I trauma center from January 2016 through December 2021 of all patients who fell from height crossing the US-Mexico border and presented with injuries requiring admission. RESULTS: A total of 448 patients were admitted with a median age of 30 years (interquartile range [IQR] 16, range 6 to 65). Monthly frequency of admissions increased markedly with a median of 18.5 (IQR 5.3) in 2021. Patients presented with limited health data, and comorbidities were identified in 111 patients (24.7%). Median height fallen was 5.5 m (18 ft). Patients sustaining a fall from ≥ 5.5 m were markedly more likely to have an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of > 15. Median length of stay was 9 days (IQR 11). There were a total of 1,066 injuries with 723 extremity and pelvic; 236 spine; and 107 head or neck, face, thorax, or abdominal injuries. Median ISS was 9.0 (IQR 7, range 1 to 75, 33% > 15). Tibial plafond fracture and spine injury were markedly associated with longer lengths of stay and ISS > 15. All injuries resulted in 635 separate surgical events and 930 procedures. Clinical follow-up occurred in 55 patients (12.2%), with median duration of 28 days (range 6 days to 8 months). DISCUSSION: Injuries associated with border crossings and falls from height were serious and increased in frequency. As the US policy on border security evolves, surgeons in these regions should be prepared to handle the associated injuries and sequelae. Prevention of these serious and debilitating injuries should be undertaken to decrease the burden of disease.

Qualitative analysis of randomized controlled trials informing recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after distal lower extremity injuries.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the quality of evidence to stratify recommendations for chemoprophylaxis following distal lower extremity trauma. Methods: Literature review identified primary studies investigating venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis following traumatic injury distal to the knee. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials in adult patients treated with and without operative intervention. Each primary study was assessed by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 checklist and Modified Coleman methodology score. Results: Literature review resulted in 462 studies, of which 9 met inclusion and exclusion criteria. All studies included low molecular weight heparin as a treatment group with 2 (22%) also including a treatment group with a direct factor Xa inhibitor. Five studies (56%) used placebo as a control group. The mean Modified Coleman Methodology score was 63% (range 51%-72%), a categorical rating of Fair. The mean Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials score was 78% (range 56%-97%). Most studies (89%) screened all asymptomatic subjects for deep venous thrombosis. Statistical significance in VTE incidence among prophylactic treatment groups was not achieved in 78%. Conclusions: Development of consensus for VTE prophylaxis recommendations following traumatic injury distal to the knee is complicated by heterogenous study populations, low incidence of VTE in study populations, and inconsistent definitions of clinically important VTE. Low molecular weight heparin is not consistently superior for preventing VTE. Chemoprophylaxis should be considered on an individual basis in the presence of additional risk factors, although an externally validated, evidence-based risk assessment tool does not currently exist.Level of Evidence: IV, therapeutic.