Quantifying Surgeon Intuition Using a Judgment Analysis Model: Surgeon Accuracy of Predicting Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Is Moderate at Best.

Purpose: To quantify surgeon intuition, determine whether a surgeon's prediction of outcomes after hip arthroscopy correlates with actual patient-reported outcomes (PRO), and identify differences in clinical judgment between expert and novice examiners. Methods: This prospective, longitudinal study was conducted at an academic medical center on adults undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. A Surgeon Intuition and Prediction (SIP) score was completed preoperatively by an attending surgeon (expert) and physician assistant (novice). Baseline and postoperative outcome measures included legacy hip scores (e.g., Modified Harris Hip score) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System tools. Mean differences were assessed using t-tests. Generalized estimating equations assessed longitudinal changes. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) evaluated associations between SIP score and PRO scores. Results: Data from 98 patients (mean age 36 years, 67% female) with complete data sets at 12-month follow-up were analyzed. Weak-to-moderate strength correlations were seen between SIP score and PRO scores (r = 0.36 to r = 0.53) for pain, activity and physical function. Significant improvements were seen in all primary outcome measures at 6 and 12 months postoperatively when compared to baseline scores (P < .05), with about 50% to 80% of patients achieving the minimum clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state thresholds postoperatively. Conclusions: An experienced, high-volume hip arthroscopist had only weak-to-moderate ability to intuitively predict PRO. Surgical intuition and judgment were not superior in an expert examiner compared to a novice. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Diagnostic intra-articular injection with provocative functional testing predicts patient-reported outcomes following hip arthroscopy: a prospective investigation.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the predictive value of preoperative diagnostic intra-articular injections with formal provocative post-injection functional testing on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following hip arthroscopy. Patients aged 14-40 with suspected labral pathology and/or femoroacetabular impingement were prospectively enrolled. Patients received a diagnostic intra-articular anesthetic injection then completed a battery of provocative physical function (PF) tests and were asked to rate the percentage of pain improvement. Patients completed PRO surveys preoperatively and up to 2 years postoperatively. PROs were compared between positive and negative injection response groups. Ninety-six patients received a diagnostic injection with provocative functional testing and subsequently underwent hip arthroscopy, 74 reported a positive injection response (≥75% improvement) and 22 reported a negative injection response (<75% improvement). The average postoperative follow-up was 12 months. Both groups experienced significant improvement in PROs postoperatively. A positive injection response was associated with greater improvements in hip outcome score, Non-Arthritic Hip Score, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference and PROMIS PF at final follow-up compared to a negative injection response. Similar improvements in modified Harris Hip Score, Visual Analog Scale hip pain and PROMIS depression were experienced between groups. These results indicate that diagnostic intra-articular hip anesthetic injection with provocative functional testing may be a valuable predictor of pain and PF following hip arthroscopy. However, patients with negative injection responses still experienced significant clinical improvement in their postoperative outcomes. As such, a negative injection response should not preclude patients from being surgical candidates, but their outcomes may be less predictable.

The Utility of Hip Arthroscopy in the Setting of Acetabular Dysplasia: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To compare patient-reported outcomes, progression of osteoarthritis, and conversion to total hip replacement in a dysplastic population when hip arthroscopy was used as an isolated treatment or as an adjunct to pelvic reorientation osteotomy. METHODS: An exhaustive search of the existing literature was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Three databases (PubMed, CINAHL [Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature], Embase) were searched for studies from January 1930 through January 2018 published in the English language concerning the use of hip arthroscopy with diagnostic and therapeutic intentions in individuals with acetabular dysplasia. We excluded studies that presented ambiguous data sets or in which clear identification of the strategy for arthroscopy was absent. RESULTS: The selection criteria were defined, and 33 studies (1,368 hip arthroscopies) were included in the final analysis. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were classified within 5 different categories: (1) hip arthroscopy for screening, chondral mapping, and planning (9 studies, 729 hip arthroscopies); (2) isolated arthroscopic treatment (13 studies, 434 hip arthroscopies); (3) outcomes of hip arthroscopy after previous reorientation pelvic osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia (4 studies, 52 hip arthroscopies); (4) arthroscopy followed by unplanned hip-preservation surgery (3 studies, 48 hip arthroscopies); and (5) combined arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy (4 studies, 106 hip arthroscopies). A risk-of-bias analysis showed a moderate to high risk of bias (level 3 or 4) within and across the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although hip arthroscopy can be used to accurately grade the severity of chondral injuries in the native hip and provide zone-specific geographic mapping that may aid in subsequent surgical planning, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that arthroscopic characterization alone has any bearing on the ultimate clinical outcomes after osseous structural correction. Isolated arthroscopic treatment is not recommended in the setting of moderate to severe dysplasia, given the inferior clinical outcomes and risk of iatrogenic instability reported for this group. However, there is limited evidence to suggest that the isolated use of hip arthroscopy may be considered in cases of borderline acetabular dysplasia when careful attention is paid to labral and capsular preservation. Limited evidence supports the conclusion that after prior reorientation pelvic osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia, hip arthroscopy leads to improved clinical and functional outcomes and should be considered in this setting. Furthermore, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that failed hip arthroscopy compromises or challenges the ultimate clinical outcomes in patients undergoing subsequent reorientation pelvic osteotomy. Last, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the adjunctive use of hip arthroscopy with reorientation pelvic osteotomy produces superior clinical outcomes compared with pelvic osteotomy alone. In summary, arthroscopic techniques may provide a useful complement to the correction of acetabular dysplasia and should be thoughtfully considered on a case-by-case basis when designing a comprehensive treatment strategy in dysplastic populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.

Current Concepts in Hip Preservation Surgery: Part II--Rehabilitation.

CONTEXT: Successful treatment of nonarthritic hip pain in young athletic individuals remains a challenge. A growing fund of clinical knowledge has paralleled technical innovations that have enabled hip preservation surgeons to address a multitude of structural variations of the proximal femur and acetabulum and concomitant intra-articular joint pathology. Often, a combination of open and arthroscopic techniques are necessary to treat more complex pathomorphologies. Peri- and postoperative recovery after such procedures can pose a substantial challenge to the patient, and a dedicated, thoughtful approach may reduce setbacks, limit morbidity, and help optimize functional outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed and CINAHL databases were searched to identify relevant scientific and review articles through December 2014 using the search terms hip preservation, labrum, surgical dislocation, femoroacetabular impingement, postoperative rehabilitation, peri-acetabular osteotomy, and rotational osteotomy. Reference lists of included articles were reviewed to locate additional references of interest. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. RESULTS: Hip preservation procedures and appropriate rehabilitation have allowed individuals to return to a physically active lifestyle. CONCLUSION: Effective postoperative rehabilitation must consider modifications and precautions specific to the particular surgical techniques used. Proper postoperative rehabilitation after hip preservation surgery may help optimize functional recovery and maximize clinical success and patient satisfaction.

Current Concepts in Hip Preservation Surgery: Part I.

CONTEXT: An evolution in conceptual understanding, coupled with technical innovations, has enabled hip preservation surgeons to address complex pathomorphologies about the hip joint to reduce pain, optimize function, and potentially increase the longevity of the native hip joint. Technical aspects of hip preservation surgeries are diverse and range from isolated arthroscopic or open procedures to hybrid procedures that combine the advantages of arthroscopy with open surgical dislocation, pelvic and/or proximal femoral osteotomy, and biologic treatments for cartilage restoration. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed and CINAHL databases were searched to identify relevant scientific and review articles from January 1920 to January 2015 using the search terms hip preservation, labrum, surgical dislocation, femoroacetabular impingement, peri-acetabular osteotomy, and rotational osteotomy. Reference lists of included articles were reviewed to locate additional references of interest. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. RESULTS: Thoughtful individualized surgical procedures are available to optimize the femoroacetabular joint in the presence of hip dysfunction. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive understanding of the relationship between femoral and pelvic orientation, morphology, and the development of intra-articular abnormalities is necessary to formulate a patient-specific approach to treatment with potential for a successful long-term result.