Ovarian reserve in women with cystic fibrosis: is this a cause of sub-fertility?

BACKGROUND: Over the past two decades, increasing number of people with cystic fibrosis (CF) survive into adulthood. Compared to the general population, sub-fertility is an obstacle for many women with CF (wwCF). Decreased ovarian reserve has been proposed as a possible cause, but limited data is available to support this. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ovarian reserve in wwCF and to correlate this with patients' demographic and clinical data. METHODS: Reproductive-aged wwCF were enrolled during their routine medical appointments. Assessment included Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels, routine blood tests and antral follicular count (AFC) evaluation. Additionally, demographic, and clinical information were collected. RESULTS: A total of wenty-three wwCF were enrolled, with ages ranging from 19 to 40 years (median 27 years). Among the fourteen wwCF who were considering pregnancy, five (35.7%) disclosed undergoing an infertility assessment and receiving fertility treatments. All but one patient had an Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) level between the 5th and 95th % for age. Measurement of the antral follicular count (AFC) was possible in 12 of the 23 patients and was ranging 8-40 with a median of 17. The proportion of wwCF presenting below median AMH values was not different in sub-fertile as compared to fertile wwCF (P value 0.54). There were no correlations between AMH levels and disease severity parameters. AMH seemed to be relatively higher in wwCF with mild class mutations, but this was not shown to have statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, in contrast with the limited available published data, do not support the hypothesis that decreased ovarian reserve plays a major role in infertility in wwCF.

Boosting Dose of Pfizer-BioNtech mRNA Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2 Does Not Affect Reproductive Outcomes in In-Vitro Fertilization Patients: A Cohort Study.

Background: Since the introduction of anti-COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, few studies have shown that reproductive outcomes in artificial reproductive technology (ART) treatments are not impaired, after receiving the two-dose regimen. Our aim was to investigate whether a boosting dose of the Pfizer-BioNtech mRNA vaccine affects reproductive outcomes in ART patients. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective observational study, including 157 consecutive in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles between October 1, 2021, and November 24, 2021, in a single university affiliated IVF unit. We included female patients going through an ART procedure and male partners in cases of utilization of a fresh sperm sample. The study population was divided into four groups according to exposure status: vaccinated and boosted patients (three total doses of Pfizer-BioNtech mRNA vaccine), patients who were vaccinated without the booster dose (one or two vaccine doses), PCR-confirmed convalescent COVID-19 patients, and unvaccinated nonconvalescent patients. Main outcome measure was clinical pregnancy rate. Results: In total, 99 (63%) female patients were vaccinated three times, 24 (15.3%) were vaccinated without the booster dose, 21 (13.4%) were convalescent, and 13 were (8.3%) unexposed. Although age differed between study groups, vaccination exposure status did not affect treatment outcome: clinical pregnancy rates, maximal estradiol levels, and number of oocytes retrieved did not differ significantly between study groups (p = 0.78, 0.50, and 0.97, respectively). Vaccinated patients who received a boosting vaccine dose were treated within 43.3 ± 30.9 days after receiving the last dose, whereas vaccinated, nonboosted, or convalescent patients were treated 168.7 ± 53 and 209.6 ± 85.1 days after their last exposure, respectively. We stratified the male cohort according to boosting vaccine dose status. Sperm concentration and motility did not differ significantly after boosting (p = 0.49 and 0.49, respectively). Conclusions: Our results provide further reassurance that IVF outcomes are not affected by the anti-SARS-CoV-2 Pfizer-BioNtech mRNA vaccine, in particular the three-dose regimen.

Physicians' attitudes and views regarding religious fasting during pregnancy and review of the literature.

Many patients worldwide seek medical advice regarding safety of fasting during pregnancy. This issue lacks high quality evidence, which makes giving medical advice challenging. To aid decision making on this subject we performed an internet mediated survey to determine the expert opinion on this issue. The survey was answered by one hundred and eight obstetricians and gynecologists (OB/GYN). The questions were aimed at the content of the medical advice given to pregnant patients on Ramadan (for Muslim patients) and Yom Kippur (for Jewish patients) fasts. For both fasts, most physicians recommended against fasting on the second or third trimester, while fasting on the first trimester was controversial. Differences were found between medical advices provided by physicians according to their demographical characteristics. Regarding Ramadan fast, senior specialists were more lenient about fasting than younger specialists (62% and 35%, respectively, p = 0.01). As to Yom Kippur fast, religious and traditional physicians were more likely to permit fasting compared to their secular colleagues (53% and 25%, respectively, p = 0.01). Additionally, a comprehensive literature review was conducted revealing possible adverse maternal and fetal outcomes of fasting; however the risk for long term clinical complications is yet to be defined.