ABSTRACT
Background: Approximately 1-2% of pregnant women undergo non-obstetric surgery under anaesthesia during their pregnancy. This review specifically targets anaesthesia management for pregnant women undergoing non-obstetric surgery in resource-limited settings. Methods: Following the delineation of primary questions, scope, and inclusion criteria, a comprehensive search strategy utilizing advanced techniques was implemented across electronic sources, databases, and websites to identify relevant articles. A rigorous screening process was applied during the literature evaluation. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement guided the conduct of this review, ensuring adherence to standardized reporting practices. Results: A total of 240 articles were initially identified from databases and websites. After screening titles and abstracts, 85 papers were excluded, and an additional 43 were removed due to duplication. Subsequently, 68 items were subjected to eligibility screening. Finally, 30 papers that specifically addressed anaesthetic considerations for pregnant women undergoing non-obstetric operations were reviewed. Conclusion: Thorough preoperative evaluation is essential for all patients, with particular attention to modifications in anaesthetic management to accommodate physiological changes during pregnancy. Urgent and emergent surgeries should proceed promptly during pregnancy to optimize outcomes for both the mother and foetus. Maintaining uteroplacental perfusion generally involves avoiding maternal hypoxaemia, hypotension, hyper- and hypocapnia, temperature extremes, and stress. When deemed safe, regional anaesthesia may offer favourable outcomes for both the mother and foetus.
ABSTRACT
Background: Adverse healthcare's events are a critical issue worldwide, neonatal intensive care unit adverse events are a considerable issue. It is important that we recognize the basic equipment needed to address these circumstances. The aim of this study is to asses' equipment preparedness for neonatal resuscitation in the neonatal intensive care unit. Method: A hospital-based, cross-sectional study was conducted on 210 neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care unit at comprehensive specialized hospital from 26/03/2022 to 26/05/2022. The data were collected using Checklist prepared from Neonatal resuscitation: current evidence and guidelines. The data obtained were summed up and presented as descriptive statistics using the Microsoft Excel and were analyzed using SPSS version 25. The result reported in text and table form. Result: In this study there was 12.72% complete equipment preparation (without defect) in 210 cases. From the total, there was minor defect in 52.8% cases, and 34.45% cases had serious defect. Serious defects were more frequently detected in the equipment preparation (42.46%), resuscitation medications (12.5%), and radiant warmer set-up (40%). Conclusion and recommendation: Overall equipment preparation for neonatal resuscitation was insufficient, and quality of equipment preparation for neonatal resuscitation and stabilization needs to be improved. To enhance equipment preparedness in the neonatal intensive care unit staff should establish uniform guidelines.
ABSTRACT
Background: Healthcare provided in medical facilities should prioritize the needs of families, as it enhances the quality of care for the patients. Family satisfaction gauges how effectively healthcare professionals address the perceived needs and expectations of family members. Numerous factors, including information dissemination, communication, family dynamics, patient characteristics, hospital facilities, and the caregiving process, serve as predictors of family satisfaction. Thus, this study seeks to evaluate the satisfaction of families with the care received by patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study involving 400 participants was conducted across multiple centers from March to June 2023. Multicollinearity was assessed by examining variance inflation factors (VIF), while the goodness-of-fit was evaluated using the Hosmer and Lemeshow test. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were utilized to identify factors correlated with family satisfaction. Variables with a p-value below 0.2 in the bivariable logistic regression were included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Adjusted Odds Ratios (AORs) with 95% Confidence Intervals were computed to indicate the strength of association. In the multivariable analysis, variables with a p-value less than 0.05 were deemed statistically significant. Results: The overall family satisfaction with the care provided in the intensive care unit was 58.6%, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 55.882% to 61.241%. Families expressed higher satisfaction levels with patient care (64.8%) and professional care (67.4%). However, they reported lower satisfaction levels regarding care provided for families (52.2%), the ICU environment (56.8%), and involvement of families in decision-making (55.8%). Lack of formal education (AOR: 1.949, 95% CI: 1.005, 4.169), completion of primary education (AOR: 2.581, 95% CI: 1.327, 5.021), and completion of grades 9-12 (AOR: 2.644, 95% CI: 1.411, 4.952) were found to be significantly associated with overall family satisfaction. Conclusion and recommendation: The overall level of satisfaction is satisfactory. To enhance service quality and family satisfaction, healthcare providers should prioritize effective and regular communication with family members. Keeping them well informed about the patient's condition and treatment plan is essential.
ABSTRACT
Background: A corneal abrasion is a flaw in the cornea's epithelial surface, which is located in the front of the eye. It causes recurrent erosions, corneal inflammation, and chronic corneal defects. In a context with limited resources, the goal of this review was to provide an evidence-based procedure for perioperative risk stratification, prevention, and management of corneal abrasion during non-ocular surgery. Methods: A medical search engines of PUBMED, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, COCHRANE REVIEW, and PUBMED CENTERAL to get access for current and updated evidence on procedures on risk stratification, prevention and management of corneal abrasion for non-ocular surgery. The authors formulate the key questions, scope, and articles written in English language, human study focuses on corneal abrasion, articles in the last 20 year was implemented to identify or filter high-level evidences were included. Reports contain corneal abrasion due to ocular surgery were excluded. All the research articles, which were identified from searches of electronic databases, were imported into Endnote software, duplicate were removed advanced search strategy of electronic sources from databases and websites was conducted using Boolean operators (cornea AND (abrasion OR injury OR laceration)) AND ("Perioperative Period" OR "general anesthesia"). Screening of literatures was conducted with proper appraisal checklist. This review was reported in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Results: From 8767 identified articles, two hundred articles were removed for duplication and 7720 studies were excluded, 1205 articles were retrieved and evaluated for eligibility. Finally, 24 were included in this systematic review. Advanced age, Prominent eyes, exophthalmus, ocular surface abnormalities (dry eye), expected duration of surgery (>1 h), the favourable position of the surgery, prone,Trendelenburg and lateral, risk of bleeding, surgical site of the surgery(head /neck) and diabetes mellitus were risk for corneal abrasion. The use of appropriate intervention with pharmacological and Non-pharmacological strategies minimizes the occurrence of perioperative corneal abrasion was crucial for the quality of care. Conclusion: Preventing and managing corneal abrasion improves patients' quality of life. However, there was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions, and high-quality trials of multimodal interventions matched to risk stratification and prevention of corneal abrasion needed to provide robust evidence to guide prevention and management of perioperative corneal abrasion.
ABSTRACT
Background: Caesarean section is one of the most common procedures and clinician faces dual challenges with feto-maternal morbidity and mortality after caesarean delivery. Enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery protocols might effectively reduce postoperative feto-maternal morbidity and mortality. Therefore, this study aimed to assess practice of enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery among parturients who underwent elective caesarean delivery. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was conducted from March to June 2021 on 225 consecutive parturients scheduled for elective caesarean delivery. A semi-structured questionnaire which developed from Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, evidence-based recommendations regarding enhanced recovery after a caesarean (2020) to collect data. Data was collected through direct observation, reviewing the chart, and patient's interview. Data were entered and analyzed in SPSS version 20. Result: Preoperative pathway; limit fasting interval (91%), haemoglobin screen and optimization (82%), and patient education (100%) found good Areas of practice Intraoperative pathway; administering postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis (100%), fluid optimization (88%), neuraxial anaesthesia with a neuraxial opioid (91%), initiating multimodal analgesia (88%), optimal uterotonic administration (88%), delayed umbilical cord clamping (85%), and prophylactic antibiotic (100%) found areas with good areas of practice. Postoperative pathways; initiation of multimodal analgesia (74%) and early removal of the urinary catheter (62%) were found areas good areas of practice. Conclusion and recommendation: The overall practice of enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery was below the target. The authors recommend that this comprehensive and specialized hospital administrator implement enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery protocol and give short-term training for health professionals' about the protocol.
ABSTRACT
Background: Operation note documentation captures the key findings and subtle elements of a surgical strategy and is crucial for patient safety. Poor operation note documentation can negatively influence postoperative patient care. This study aimed to assess manual operation note documentation practice. Methods: An institutional-based, cross-sectional study was conducted from 30 March to 30 April 2022, on 240 operation notes of patient data. Data were entered and analyzed by SPSS version 20. According to the RCSE, the Royal College of Surgeons of England, the practice of operation note documentation was rated excellent for each variable when it met 100%, good if it met more than 50%, and poor if it met less than 50% of the operation notes of patient data. Results: All operation notes (n=240) were handwritten. The practice of manual operation note documentation was deemed excellent in two (7.69%), good in 18 (69.2%), and poor in six (23.1%). Residents wrote 84.2% of the operation notes and surgeons and assistants were identified in greater than 94% of the notes, while anesthesia team members were identified in 90.8%. Estimated blood loss was documented in 4.2% of the notes, and the closure technique was described in 64.2%. The operation note templates did not include antibiotic prophylaxis, runner nurse name, or gauze and instrument counts. The urgency of the surgery and time of documentation had a negative relationship, and the seniority of the operation note writer had a positive relationship with manual operative note documentation practice. Conclusions and recommendations: Compared to the standard, all operation note documentation was incomplete and below the standard. We recommend that this comprehensive and specialized hospital administrator implement a new format for operation notes that incorporates RCSE requirements.
ABSTRACT
Perioperative anaesthesia record completeness is very essential skill of the anaesthesia profession at the time of operation in the health setting. During perioperative, anaesthesia care sometimes there may be missing important information of the patient, medication taken or planned. This study aimed to improve perioperative anaesthesia information management practice. Methodology: Pre-interventional and post-interventional cross-sectional study was conducted from 21 June to 25 July 2022 on 164 anaesthesia record filled by 51 anaesthesia care provider in pre-interventional and post-interventional phase. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire and the data entered by Epi-data software (version 4.6) and analyzed by using SPSS version 26. For all indicators, the projected completion rate was 100%. Indicators with completion rates of greater than 90% were classified as acceptable, while those with completion rates of 50% were seen as urgently needing improvement. Results: Pre-interventional result: among all indicators, none of the indicators had 100%, completeness rate. Postoperative nausea and vomiting management orders, the names of the surgeon and anaesthetist, the location of the intravenous cannula, the maintenance of anaesthesia, the total amount of fluid supplied, the content of the consent discussion, and null per ose status, age, and weight of the patient were some of the markers that were identified below average (50%) and in need of significant improvement. Post-interventional result: when compared with the pre-interventional result, their documentation skills were improving after discussions with stakeholders and the relevant bodies; however, none of the indicators attained 100% completion rate. Conclusion and recommendation: Even after the interventions, the desired completion rate was not attained. As a result, it requires ongoing instruction on perioperative anaesthesia information management according to the standard perspectives.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients undergoing surgery frequently experience unfavorable anesthetic outcomes. They may have an impact on body systems and result in more serious postoperative morbidities. This study was conducted to determine the incidence of postoperative undesirable anesthetic outcomes among surgical patients at referral hospitals in Amhara region, Ethiopia. Methods: A total of 412 patients, who underwent surgical procedures between August 1 and October 30 of 2022, were included in this study. The Leiden Perioperative Care Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire's (LPPSq) dimension "discomfort and needs" was used to collect data on the first postoperative day. Data entry and analysis were performed using SPSS version 20. To assess how risk factors affected the outcome variable, logistic regression analysis was utilized. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, a variable with a P-value of less than 0.05 was statistically considered as significant. Results: The proportion of those who had "at least a little bit" of unfavorable outcomes was calculated to estimate their overall prevalence, and the prevalence of those who had "more than moderate" levels of unfavorable outcomes was determined to appreciate how severe these outcomes were. The percentages of postoperative pain, the most common undesired result, for "at least a little bit" and "more than moderate" were 87.7% and 32.3%, respectively. In this study, postoperative cold was the least prevalent (51.4%) undesirable anesthetic outcome. The remaining undesirable postoperative outcomes were reported less frequently. Conclusion and Recommendation: Undesirable postoperative anesthetic outcomes were still common. The most frequent unfavorable result was postoperative pain. Adequate postoperative patient follow-up and quality service are paramount.
ABSTRACT
Background: Traumatic brain injury is a major list of health and socioeconomic problems especially in low- and middle-income countries which influences productive age groups. Differences in patient characteristics, socioeconomic status, intensive care unit admission thresholds, health-care systems, and the availability of varying numbers of intensive care unit (ICU) beds among hospitals had shown to be the causes for the variation on the incidence in mortality following traumatic brain injury across different continents. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and predictors of mortality among patients with traumatic brain injury at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. Methods: A retrospective follow-up study was conducted based on chart review and selected patient charts admitted from January, 2017 to January, 2022. Participants in the study were chosen using a simple random sample procedure that was computer generated. Data was entered with epi-data version 4.6 and analyzed using SPSS version 26. Both bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used, and in multivariate logistic regression analysis, P-value <0.05 with 95% CI was considered statistically significant. Results: The magnitude of mortality was 28.8%. Most of the injuries were caused by assault followed by road traffic accident (RTA). About 30% of the subjects presented with severe head injuries and epidural hematoma (EDH) followed by skull fracture were the most common diagnoses on admission. The independent predictors of mortality were male sex (AOR: 6.12, CI: 1.82, 20.5), severe class injury with Glasco coma scale (GCS <9) (AOR: 5.96, CI: 2.07, 17.12), intraoperative hypoxia episode (AOR: 10.5, CI: 2.6-42.1), hyperthermia (AOR: 25, CI: 5.54, 115.16), lack of pre-hospital care (AOR: 2.64 CI: 1.6-4.2), abnormal appearance on both eyes (AOR: 13.4, CI: 5.1-34.6), in-hospital hypoxia episode and having extra-cranial concomitant injury were positively associated with mortality, while on admission, systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 100-149 (AOR: 0.086, CI: 0.016-0.46) was negatively associated with mortality. Conclusion: The overall mortality rate was considerably high. As a result, traumatic brain injury management should be focused on modifiable factors that increase patient mortality, such as on-admission hypotension, a lack of pre-hospital care, post-operative complications, an intraoperative hypoxia episode, and hyperthermia.
ABSTRACT
Background: Rebound pain is extreme pain that persists after the effects of regional anesthesia wear off. Rebound pain occurrence and intensity are influenced by patient, surgical, and anesthesia-related factors. The incidence and severity of rebound pain after peripheral nerve block resolution are both reduced by the use of perioperative multimodal strategy. The purpose of the current paper was to evaluate the frequency, seriousness, and risk factors for rebound pain following peripheral nerve block resolution. Method: A cross-sectional study centred on 384 patients who had received peripheral nerve blocks was carried out from August 20, 2021, to June 30, 2022. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to gather information within 24 h following the block's performance. SPSS 25 was used to enter and analyze the data. The change from well-controlled pain while the block is operating to severe pain within 24 h of block performance is known as rebound pain. Both univariate and multivariable analyses were used to examine the relationship between various parameters (patient, surgical, and anesthetic-related factors) and rebound pain. In the multivariable analysis, a P-value of 0.05 or lower is regarded as statistically significant. Results: The incidence of rebound pain after peripheral nerve block was resolved was 61.7% (95% CI: 56.5-66.7) with a mean rebound pain score of 4.19 ± 2. Of the total 237, 120(50.6%) had severe rebound pain after the peripheral nerve block was resolved. The use of preoperative intravenous dexamethasone (AOR: 2.6, 95%CI: 20.29-24.57), preoperative pain (AOR: 3.9, 95%CI: 41-57.4), type of surgery (AOR: 6.5, 95%CI: 1.45-11.7), post-operative NSAID (AOR: 2.2, 95%CI: 17.69-20.8), and opioid use (AOR: 2.2, 95%CI: 19.1-22.56) were independent risks associated with rebound pain. Conclusions: and Recommendation: Rebound pain occurred in 61.7% of patients and had independent associations with preoperative pain, dexamethasone premedication, type of surgery, use of an adjuvant, use of postoperative opioids, and NSAIDs. Therefore, clinicians should continue to use preventative strategies, especially for patients at higher risk of experiencing rebound pain.
ABSTRACT
Background: Preoperative anesthesia evaluation is beginning of all anesthesia care. It enables the anesthetists to know general health status of parturient, choose of anesthesia options and discuss the possible complication regarding perioperative anesthesia care. It also creates chance for parturient to know the anesthetist, about anesthesia type as well as possible anesthesia care related complications. Objective: To assess maternal satisfaction with the practice of preoperative anesthesia evaluation among patients underwent elective cesarean delivery. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study design conducted from March 1to April 30, 2021. All consecutive parturient that were scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under anesthesia during the study period were interviewed postoperatively after 24 h using semi structure questioner. A checklists, which developed based on the hospital's anesthetic evaluation sheet and Royal Collage of Anesthetist standards (RCOA) were used for data collection. Data were entered in SPSS version 20 and both descriptive and analytic statics analysis were performed. Result: A total of 157 elective patients undergoing elective cesarean section were included with response rate of 96.9%. All patients (100%) were evaluated in the preoperative period. However, 53(33.8%) of patients were receiving information regarding postoperative nausea and vomiting during the preoperative period compared to the standards. Educational level of the anesthetist, fasting instruction, information regarding PONV and information regarding type of anesthesia were significantly associated with overall maternal satisfaction to current practice of preoperative anesthesia evaluation. Conclusion and recommendation: The practice of delivering important information's to parturient during the preoperative anesthesia evaluation was low compared to the standard. Therefore, we recommend anesthesia professionals to give detail explanation regarding the post-operative pain management option, possible inevitable complications and proper rapport with the clients.
ABSTRACT
Background: Quality of pain management in emergency departments may be affected by nurses' perceived barriers. Poorly managed pain may lead to altered physiological and psychological function which affect patients' quality of life as well as increase costs to the health care system. Objective: This study aimed to assess emergency nurse's perceived barriers to pain management and associated factors at emergency departments, 2021. Methods: A multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted with 153 nurses from eight emergency departments from May1-May 30, 2021 with semi-structured questionnaire. All volunteer nurses were included. Epi-info version 7 and SPSS version 20.0 were used for data entry and analysis respectively. We used descriptive statistics to report results of the study in the form of text and table. Student t-test, one way ANOVA and Post hoc test were applied to assess relationship between socio-demographic characteristics of the participants with perceived barriers. Result: Of the 20 items, overcrowding 3.24 ± 0.9, nursing workload 3.16 ± 1.03, and lack of pain management guidelines/protocol2.5 ± 1.15 were the highest reported barriers to pain management at an emergency department. In addition, years of work experience as emergency nurses≤1 (p-value = 0.01), BSC level of education (p-value = 0.04), married (p-value = 0.04) and frequency of training ≤ (p-value = 0.02) were significantly associated with nurses perceived barriers on pain management. Conclusion: and Recommendation: Overcrowding, nurses' workload, absence of pain management tool, year of experience as emergency nurse ≤1, married, BSC nurses and frequency of training≤1 were the perceived barriers to pain management in the emergency department. The stakeholders in each facility should make an effort to increase the ratio of nurses to emergency patients. Professionals should develop local pain assessment and management protocol. Training should be given regularly and the opportunity of education should be maximized.
