ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate choices of and reasoning behind chorionic villous sampling and opinions on non-invasive prenatal testing among women and men achieving pregnancy following preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for hereditary disorders. METHODS: A questionnaire was electronically submitted to patients who had achieved a clinical pregnancy following PGT at the Center for Preimplantation Genetic Testing, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, between 2017 and 2020. RESULTS: Chorionic villous sampling was declined by approximately half of the patients. The primary reason for declining was the perceived risk of miscarriage due to the procedure. Nine out of 10 patients responded that they would have opted for a non-invasive prenatal test if it had been offered. Some patients were not aware that the nuchal translucency scan offered to all pregnant women in the early second trimester only rarely provides information on the hereditary disorder for which PGT was performed. CONCLUSION: Improved counseling on the array of prenatal tests and screenings available might be required to assist patients in making better informed decisions regarding prenatal testing. Non-invasive prenatal testing is welcomed by the patients and will likely increase the number of patients opting for confirmatory prenatal testing following PGT for hereditary disorders.
Subject(s)
Chorionic Villi Sampling/psychology , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/diagnosis , Genetic Testing , Noninvasive Prenatal Testing , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Preference/psychology , Preimplantation Diagnosis/psychology , Adult , Chorionic Villi Sampling/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Directive Counseling , Female , Genetic Counseling/psychology , Health Care Surveys , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Noninvasive Prenatal Testing/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Preference/statistics & numerical data , PregnancyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is an overuse of cardiotocography for intrapartum fetal monitoring for low-risk women in high-income countries, despite recommendations from evidence-based guidelines. AIM: To understand why midwives use cardiotocography for low-risk women despite evidence-based recommendations and to understand the roles of the cardiotocograph machine. METHOD: This qualitative study used focus groups for data collection. Thirty-one midwives and three student midwives participated from four different countries: New Zealand, Australia, Denmark, and Norway. Constant comparative analysis, informed by an actor-network theory framework, was the method of data analysis. FINDINGS: Cardiotocography was multifaceted and influenced all attendants in the birth environment. The cardiotocograph itself is assigned different roles within the complex networks surrounding childbirth. The cardiotocograph's roles were as a babysitter, the midwives' partner, an agent of shared responsibility, a protector that 'covers your back', a disturber of normal birth, and a requested guest. DISCUSSION: The application of the actor-network theory enabled us to understand how midwives perceive cardiotocography. The assigned roles of the cardiotocograph shape its everyday use more than evidence-based guidelines. Discussion of these inconsistencies must inform the use of cardiotocography in the care of women with low-risk pregnancies. CONCLUSION: We found that the cardiotocograph is a multifaceted actant that influences practice by performing different roles. Drawing on this study, we suggest that actor-network theory could be a helpful theoretical perspective to critically reflect upon the increasing use of technologies within maternity care.
