Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Environ Qual ; 52(3): 558-572, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36504408

ABSTRACT

Rice paddies are one of the major sources of anthropogenic methane (CH4 ) emissions. The alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation management has been shown to reduce CH4 emissions and total global warming potential (GWP) (CH4 and nitrous oxide [N2 O]). However, there is limited information about utilizing AWD management to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from commercial-scale continuous rice fields. This study was conducted for five consecutive growing seasons (2015-2019) on a pair of adjacent fields in a commercial farm in Arkansas under long-term continuous rice rotation irrigated with either continuously flooded (CF) or AWD conditions. The cumulative CH4 emissions in the growing season across the two fields and 5 years ranged from 41 to 123 kg CH4 -C ha-1 for CF and 1 to 73 kg CH4 -C ha-1 for AWD. On average, AWD reduced CH4 emissions by 73% relative to CH4 emissions in CF fields. Compared to N2 O emissions, CH4 emissions dominated the GWP with an average contribution of 91% in both irrigation treatments. There was no significant variation in grain yield (7.3-11.9 Mg ha-1 ) or growing season N2 O emissions (-0.02 to 0.51 kg N2 O-N ha-1 ) between the irrigation treatments. The yield-scaled GWP was 368 and 173 kg CO2 eq. Mg-1 season-1 for CF and AWD, respectively, showing the feasibility of AWD on a commercial farm to reduce the total GHG emissions while sustaining grain yield. Seasonal variations of GHG emissions observed within fields showed total GHG emissions were predominantly influenced by weather (precipitation) and crop and irrigation management. The influence of air temperature and floodwater heights on GHG emissions had high degree of variability among years and fields. These findings demonstrate that the use of multiyear GHG emission datasets could better capture variability of GHG emissions associated with rice production and could improve field verification of GHG emission models and scaling factors for commercial rice farms.


Subject(s)
Greenhouse Gases , Oryza , Agriculture , Nitrous Oxide/analysis , Methane/analysis , Arkansas , Greenhouse Gases/analysis , Edible Grain/chemistry , Soil
2.
J Environ Qual ; 40(2): 431-7, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21520750

ABSTRACT

Surface application of manure in reduced tillage systems generates nuisance odors, but their management is hindered by a lack of standardized field quantification methods. An investigation was undertaken to evaluate odor emissions associated with various technologies that incorporate manure with minimal soil disturbance. Dairy manure slurry was applied by five methods in a 3.5-m swath to grassland in 61-m-inside-diameter rings. Nasal Ranger Field Olfactometer (NRO) instruments were used to collect dilutions-to-threshold (D/T) observations from the center of each ring using a panel of four odor assessors taking four readings each over a 10-min period. The Best Estimate Threshold D/T (BET10) was calculated for each application method and an untreated control based on preapplication and <1 h, 2 to 4 h, and approximately 24 h after spreading. Whole-air samples were simultaneously collected for laboratory dynamic olfactometer evaluation using the triangular forced-choice (TFC) method. The BET10 of NRO data composited for all measurement times showed D/T decreased in the following order (a = 0.05): surface broadcast > aeration infiltration > surface + chisel incorporation > direct ground injection Sshallow disk injection > control, which closely followed laboratory TFC odor panel results (r = 0.83). At 24 h, odor reduction benefits relative to broadcasting persisted for all methods except aeration infiltration, and odors associated with direct ground injection were not different from the untreated control. Shallow disk injection provided substantial odor reduction with familiar toolbar equipment that is well adapted to regional soil conditions and conservation tillage operations.


Subject(s)
Agriculture/methods , Air Pollutants/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Manure , Odorants , Animals , Cattle
3.
J Environ Qual ; 35(6): 1999-2010, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17071868

ABSTRACT

Accumulation of soluble salts resulting from fertilizer N may affect microbial production of N(2)O and CO(2) in soils. This study was conducted to determine the effects of electrical conductivity (EC) and water content on N(2)O and CO(2) production in five soils under intensive cropping. Surface soils from maize fields were washed, repacked and brought to 60% or 90% water-filled pore space (WFPS). Salt mixtures were added to achieve an initial in situ soil EC of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 dS m(-1). The soil cores were incubated at 25 degrees C for 10 d. Average CO(2) production decreased with increasing EC at both soil water contents, indicating a general reduction in microbial respiration with increasing EC. Average cumulative N(2)O production at 60% WFPS decreased from 2.0 mg N(2)O-N m(-2) at an initial EC of 0.5 dS m(-1) to 0.86 mg N(2)O-N m(-2) at 2.0 dS m(-1). At 90% WFPS, N(2)O production was 2 to 40 times greater than that at 60% WFPS and maximum N(2)O losses occurred at the highest EC level of 2.0 dS m(-1). Differences in the magnitude of gas emissions at varying WFPS were due to available substrate N and the predominance of nitrification under aerobic conditions (60% WFPS) and denitrification when oxygen was limited (90% WFPS). Differences in gas emissions at varying soil EC may be due to changes in mechanisms of adjustment to salt stress and ion toxicities by microbial communities. Direct effects of EC on microbial respiration and N(2)O emissions need to be accounted for in ecosystems models for predicting soil greenhouse gas emissions.


Subject(s)
Carbon Dioxide/metabolism , Electric Conductivity , Nitrous Oxide/metabolism , Soil Microbiology , Soil/analysis , Water/analysis , Aerobiosis , Carbon Dioxide/analysis , Environmental Monitoring , Nitrous Oxide/analysis , Oxygen/metabolism , Time Factors , Volatilization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...