[Current management of anal incontinence]. / Prise en charge actuelle de l'incontinence anale.

Even though anal incontinence affects a significant proportion of the population, causing a major burden to both patient and society, it still remains "the last closet issue". Less than a third of patients will share this problem with their physician. Consequently, the incidence of anal incontinence is difficult to determine, varying from 2-50%. Since this disabling condition is often associated with urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse, a multidisciplinary team approach is required. A wide range of therapeutic options are available. When dietary, medical and rehabilitative treatments have failed, sacral neuromodulation should be considered in selected cases. More invasive surgery is usually undertaken in the presence of major structural defects. The aim of this article is to suggest a comprehensive way of identifying and treating anal incontinence.

Electrical stimulation induces propagated colonic contractions in an experimental model.

BACKGROUND: Direct colonic electrical stimulation may prove to be a treatment option for specific motility disorders such as chronic constipation. The aim of this study was to provoke colonic contractions using electrical stimulation delivered from a battery-operated device. METHODS: Electrodes were inserted into the caecal seromuscular layer of eight anaesthetized pigs. Contractions were induced by a neurostimulator (Medtronic 3625). Caecal motility was measured simultaneously by video image analysis, manometry and a technique assessing colonic transit. RESULTS: Caecal contractions were generated using 8-10 V amplitude, 1000 micros pulse width, 120 Hz frequency for 10-30 s, with an intensity of 7-15 mA. The maximal contraction strength was observed after 20-25 s. Electrical stimulation was followed by a relaxation phase of 1.5-2 min during which contractions propagated orally and aborally over at least 10 cm. Spontaneous and stimulated caecal motility values were significantly different for both intraluminal pressure (mean(s.d.) 332(124) and 463(187) mmHg respectively; P < 0.001, 42 experiments) and movement of contents (1.6(0.9) and 3.9(2.8) mm; P < 0.001, 40 experiments). CONCLUSION: Electrical stimulation modulated caecal motility, and provoked localized and propagated colonic contractions.

Detection of metastatic disease with sentinel lymph node dissection in colorectal carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: In curative colorectal cancer surgery, radical lymph node dissection is essential for staging and decision-making for adjuvant treatment. PURPOSE: The aims of the study were to analyse to what extent sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) in colorectal cancer could upstage N0 patients and how lymphatic mapping could demonstrate micrometastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, patients were selected by CT scanning, avoiding bulky disease and distant metastasis. When standard staining (HE) was negative, micrometastases were searched for by immunohistochemistry (cytokeratin 11, CEA and Ca19-9 antibodies). Micrometastatic lymph nodes were classified N+(i). RESULTS: Detection of sentinel lymph nodes was successful in 48 out of 52 colorectal cancer patients. Among the 44 M0 patients, 22 were N0 (i-) and 22 were N+ (13 with standard HE procedure, three were N+ (macrometastasis) with the SN as the only positive node and six patients had 1-4 micrometastatic SN (N+(i)). An overall potential upstaging of 9/44 could be considered after SLND. With a mean follow-up of 48 months survival, analysis showed that disease-specific survival of the group of six N+(i) patients was intermediate between the group of 22 N0 (i-) patients and the group of 16 N+ patients. CONCLUSION: SLND may improve the detection of metastasis in conventionally bivalved nodes. Further studies could assess if micrometastatic disease detected in SN could be integrated into the risk factors for stage II patients in order to consider adjuvant chemotherapy.