Combined Charlson comorbidity/C-Reactive Protein Index Is a Novel Predictor in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of the International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer (INMARC) Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictive ability of a novel combined index, Charlson comorbidity index and C-reactive protein (CCI-CRP), for outcomes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and compare predictive outcomes with of CCI-CRP to its separate components and to the UCLA integrated staging system (UISS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed INMARC registry of RCC patients. Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) analysis was fitted to identify threshold defining low-CRP (LCRP) and high-CRP (HCRP). Patients were stratified according to CCI [low-CCI ≤ 3 (LCCI); intermediate-CCI 4-6 (ICCI); high-CCI > 6 (HCCI)] and CRP level. Kaplan-Meier analysis (KMA) was conducted for overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Based on survival analysis distribution we proposed a new stratification: CCI-CRP. Model performance was assessed with ROC/area under the curve (AUC) analysis and compared to CCI and CRP alone, and UISS. RESULTS: We analyzed 2,890 patients (median follow-up 30 months). ROC identified maximum product sensitivity and specificity for CRP at 3.5 mg/L. KMA revealed 5-year OS of 95.6% for LCRP/LCCI, 83% LCRP/ICCI, 73.3% LCRP/HCCI, 62.6% HCRP/LCCI, 51.6% HCRP/ICCI and 40.5% HCRP/HCCI (P < .001). From this distribution, new CCI-CRP is proposed: low CCI-CRP (LCRP/LCCI and LCRP/ICCI), intermediate CCI-CRP (LCRP/HCCI and HCRP/LCCI), and high CCI-CRP (HCRP/ICCI and HCRP/HCCI). AUC for CCI-CRP showed improved performance for predicting OS/CSS vs. CCI alone (0.73 vs. 0.63/0.77 vs. 0.60), CRP alone (0.73 vs. 0.71/0.77 vs. 0.74) and UISS (0.73 vs 0.67/0.77 vs 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: CCI-CRP, exhibits increased prognostic performance for survival outcomes in RCC compared to CCI and CRP alone, and UISS. Further investigation is requisite.

Predictive factors for recurrence and outcomes in T1a renal cell carcinoma: Analysis of the INMARC (International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer) database.

OBJECTIVE: Stage migration in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has led to an increasing proportion of diagnosed small renal masses. Emerging knowledge regarding heterogeneity of RCC histologies and consequent impact on prognosis led us to further explore outcomes and predictive factors in surgically-treated T1a RCC. METHODS: The INMARC database was queried for T1aN0M0 RCC. Patients were stratified into groups based on recurrence. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed for factors associated with recurrence, cancer-specific (CSM), and all-cause mortality (ACM). Kaplan-Meier analyses (KMA) assessed survival by histology and grade. Subset analysis for time to recurrence was conducted for grade and histologic groups and compared with recent AUA follow-up guidelines [low-risk (AUA-LR), intermediate-risk (AUA-IR), high-risk (AUA-HR), and very-high risk (AUA-VHR) groups]. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,878 patients (median follow-up 35.2 months); 101 (5.4%) developed recurrence. MVA for recurrence demonstrated increasing age (P = 0.026), male sex (P = 0.043), diabetes (P = 0.007), high/unclassified grade (P < 0.001-0.007), and variant histology (P = 0.017) as independent risk factors for increased risk, while papillary (P = 0.016) and chromophobe (P = 0.049) were associated with decreased risk. MVA identified high/unclassified grade (P = 0.003-0.004) and pT3a upstaging (P = 0.043) as predictive factors for worsened risk of CSM while papillary (P = 0.034) was associated with improved risk. MVA for ACM demonstrated increasing age (P < 0.001), non-white (P < 0.001), high-grade (P = 0.022), variant histology (P = 0.049), recurrence (P = 0.004), and eGFR<45 at last follow-up (P < 0.001) to be independent risk factors. KMA comparing clear cell, chromophobe, papillary, and variant RCC revealed significant differences for 5-year CSS (P = 0.018) and RFS (P < 0.001), but not OS (P = 0.34). Median time to recurrence was 23.8 months for low-grade (AUA-LR), 17.3 months for high-grade (AUA-IR), 18 months for pT3a upstaging (AUA-HR), and 12 months for variant histology (AUA-VHR; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We noted differential outcomes in T1a RCC based on histology and grade for recurrence and CSM, while renal functional decline in addition to pathological factors and recurrence were predictive for ACM. Our findings support recently promulgated AUA follow-up guidelines for low-grade and variant histology pT1a RCC, but call for consolidation of follow-up protocols for high-grade pT1a and pT3a upstaged patients, with intensification of frequency of imaging follow-up in pT1a high-grade RCC.

Association of Elevated C-Reactive Protein with Worsened Outcomes in Different Histologies of Renal Cortical Tumors: Analysis of the INMARC Registry.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate relationship between histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and preoperative c-reactive protein (CRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We queried the International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer database for patients affected by RCC. Patients were classified according to their histology: benign tumors, clear cell (cc) RCC, chromophobe (ch) RCC, papillary (p) RCC, and variant histology (vh) RCC; and according to CRP (mg/L): low CRP ≤5 and high CRP >5. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM). Secondary outcomes were cancer-specific mortality (CSM), recurrence and association between CRP and histology. Multivariable analysis (MVA) via Cox regression and multivariable logistic regression were fitted to elucidate predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: Total 3902 patients (high CRP n = 1266) were analyzed; median follow up 51 (IQR 20-91) months. On MVA elevated CRP was an independent risk factor associated with increased risk of ACM in benign tumors (HR 5.98, P < .001), ccRCC (HR 2.69, P < .001), chRCC (HR 3.99, P < .001), pRCC (HR 1.76, P = .009) and vhRCC (HR 2.97, P =.007). MVA for CSM showed CRP as risk factor in ccRCC (HR 2.77, P < .001), chRCC (HR 6.16, P = .003) and pRCC (HR 2.29, P = .011), while in vhRCC was not (P = .27). MVA for recurrence reported CRP as risk factor for ccRCC (HR 1.30, P = .013), while in chRCC (P = .33), pRCC (P = .34) and vhRCC (P = .52) was not. On multivariable logistic regression CRP was a predictor of pRCC (OR 1.003, P = .002), while decreasing CRP was associated with benign tumors (OR 0.994, P = .048). CONCLUSION: Elevated CRP was a robust predictor of worsened ACM in all renal cortical neoplasms. While most frequently observed in pRCC patients, elevated CRP was independently associated with worsened CSM in non-vhRCC. Conversely, elevated CRP was least likely to be noted in benign tumors, and elevation in this subgroup of patients should prompt further consideration for surveillance given increased risk of ACM. Further investigation is requisite.

Unraveling the BMI paradox in different renal cortical tumors: insights from the INMARC registry.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate impact of body mass index (BMI) on survival across different histologies and stages of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of clear cell (ccRCC) and non-ccRCC. Obesity was defined according to the WHO criteria (non-Asian BMI >30 Kg/m2, Asian BMI >27.5 Kg/m2). Multivariable analysis (MVA) via Cox regression model was conducted for all-cause (ACM), cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 3,880 patients with a median follow-up of 31 (IQR 9-64) months were analyzed. Overall, 1,373 (35.3%) were obese; 2,895 (74.6%) were ccRCC and 985 (25.3%) were non-ccRCC (chRCC 246 [24.9%], pRCC 469 [47.6%] and vhRCC 270 [27.4%]). MVA in ccRCC revealed obesity associated with decreased risk of ACM, CSM and recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, P = 0.044; HR 0.71, P = 0.039; HR 0.73, P = 0.012, respectively), while in non-ccRCC was not associated with decreased risk of ACM, CSM, and recurrence (P = 0.84, P = 0.53, P = 0.84, respectively). Subset analysis in stage IV ccRCC demonstrated obesity as associated with a decreased risk of ACM, CSM, and recurrence (HR 0.68, P = 0.04; HR 0.59, P = 0.01; HR 0.59, P = 0.01, respectively), while in stage I-III ccRCC was not (P = 0.21; P = 0.30; P = 0.19, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings refute a broad "obesity paradox" for RCC. Obesity was not associated with improved survival in non-ccRCC and in nonmetastatic ccRCC, while metastatic ccRCC patients with obesity had improved survival outcomes.

Development of a novel score (RENSAFE) to determine probability of acute kidney injury and renal functional decline post surgery: A multicenter analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To create and validate 2 models called RENSAFE (RENalSAFEty) to predict postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) and development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3b in patients undergoing partial (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) for kidney cancer. METHODS: Primary objective was to develop a predictive model for AKI (reduction >25% of preoperative eGFR) and de novo CKD≥3b (<45 ml/min/1.73m2), through stepwise logistic regression. Secondary outcomes include elucidation of the relationship between AKI and de novo CKD≥3a (<60 ml/min/1.73m2). Accuracy was tested with receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: AKI occurred in 452/1,517 patients (29.8%) and CKD≥3b in 116/903 patients (12.8%). Logistic regression demonstrated male sex (OR = 1.3, P = 0.02), ASA score (OR = 1.3, P < 0.01), hypertension (OR = 1.6, P < 0.001), R.E.N.A.L. score (OR = 1.2, P < 0.001), preoperative eGFR<60 (OR = 1.8, P = 0.009), and RN (OR = 10.4, P < 0.0001) as predictors for AKI. Age (OR 1.0, P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR 2.5, P < 0.001), preoperative eGFR <60 (OR 3.6, P < 0.001) and RN (OR 2.2, P < 0.01) were predictors for CKD≥3b. AUC for RENSAFE AKI was 0.80 and 0.76 for CKD≥3b. AKI was predictive for CKD≥3a (OR = 2.2, P < 0.001), but not CKD≥3b (P = 0.1). Using 21% threshold probability for AKI achieved sensitivity: 80.3%, specificity: 61.7% and negative predictive value (NPV): 88.1%. Using 8% cutoff for CKD≥3b achieved sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 65.7%, and NPV: 96%. CONCLUSION: RENSAFE models utilizing perioperative variables that can predict AKI and CKD may help guide shared decision making. Impact of postsurgical AKI was limited to less severe CKD (eGFR<60 ml/min 71.73m2). Confirmatory studies are requisite.

Proposal for a Two-Tier Re-classification of Stage IV/M1 domain of Renal Cell Carcinoma into M1 ("Oligometastatic") and M2 ("Polymetastatic") subdomains: Analysis of the Registry for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (REMARCC).

Purpose: We hypothesized that two-tier re-classification of the "M" (metastasis) domain of the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging of Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) may improve staging accuracy than the current monolithic classification, as advancements in the understanding of tumor biology have led to increased recognition of the heterogeneous potential of metastatic RCC (mRCC). Methods: Multicenter retrospective analysis of patients from the REMARCC (REgistry of MetAstatic RCC) database. Patients were stratified by number of metastases into two groups, M1 (≤3, "Oligometastatic") and M2 (>3, "Polymetastatic"). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox-regression and Kaplan-Meier (KMA) analysis were utilized for outcomes, and receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) was utilized to assess diagnostic accuracy compared to current "M" staging. Results: 429 patients were stratified into proposed M1 and M2 groups (M1 = 286/M2 = 143; median follow-up 19.2 months). Cox-regression revealed M2 classification as an independent risk factor for worsened all-cause mortality (HR=1.67, p=0.001) and cancer-specific mortality (HR=1.74, p<0.001). Comparing M1-oligometastatic vs. M2-polymetastatic groups, KMA revealed significantly higher 5-year OS (36% vs. 21%, p<0.001) and 5-year CSS (39% vs. 17%, p<0.001). ROC analyses comparing OS and CSS, for M1/M2 reclassification versus unitary M designation currently in use demonstrated improved c-index for OS (M1/M2 0.635 vs. unitary M 0.500) and CSS (M1/M2 0.627 vs. unitary M 0.500). Conclusion: Subclassification of Stage "M" domain of mRCC into two clinical substage categories based on metastatic burden corresponds to distinctive tumor groups whose oncological potential varies significantly and result in improved predictive capability compared to current staging.

Age-Related Differences in Oncological Outcomes in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Impact of Functional Conservation as Measured by Postoperative eGFR.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine whether loss of renal function increases risk of recurrence and metastases in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and whether this impact was age-related. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer (INMARC) registry. Patients were separated into younger (<65 years old) and elder (≥65 years old) age groups, and rates of de novo estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR<45 mL/min/1.73m2 [eGFR<45]) were calculated. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was conducted for predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and all-cause mortality (ACM). Kaplan-Meier Analysis (KMA) was conducted for PFS and overall survival (OS) in younger and elder age groups stratified by functional status. RESULTS: We analyzed 1805 patients (1113 age<65, 692 age≥65). On MVA in patients <65, de novo eGFR<45 was independently associated with greater risk for worsened progression (HR=1.61, P=.038) and ACM (HR=1.82, P=.018). For patients ≥65, de novo eGFR<45 was not independently associated with progression (P=.736), or ACM (P=.286). Comparing patients with de novo eGFR<45 vs. eGFR ≥45, KMA demonstrated worsened 5-year PFS and OS in patients <65 (PFS: 68% vs. 86%, P<.001; OS: 73% vs. 90%, P<.001), while in patients ≥65, only 5-year OS was worsened (77% vs. 81%, P<.021). CONCLUSION: Development of de novo eGFR<45 was associated with more profound impact on patients <65 compared to patients ≥65, being an independent risk factor for PFS and ACM. The mechanisms of this phenomenon are unclear but underscore desirability for nephron preservation when safe and feasible in younger patients.