Long-Term Evaluation of Women Referred to a Breast Cancer Family History Clinic (Manchester UK 1987-2020).

Clinics for women concerned about their family history of breast cancer are widely established. A Family History Clinic was set-up in Manchester, UK, in 1987 in a Breast Unit serving a population of 1.8 million. In this review, we report the outcome of risk assessment, screening and prevention strategies in the clinic and propose future approaches. Between 1987-2020, 14,311 women were referred, of whom 6.4% were from known gene families, 38.2% were at high risk (≥30% lifetime risk), 37.7% at moderate risk (17-29%), and 17.7% at an average/population risk who were discharged. A total of 4168 (29.1%) women were eligible for genetic testing and 736 carried pathogenic variants, predominantly in BRCA1 and BRCA2 but also other genes (5.1% of direct referrals). All women at high or moderate risk were offered annual mammographic screening between ages 30 and 40 years old: 646 cancers were detected in women at high and moderate risk (5.5%) with a detection rate of 5 per 1000 screens. Incident breast cancers were largely of good prognosis and resulted in a predicted survival advantage. All high/moderate-risk women were offered lifestyle prevention advice and 14-27% entered various lifestyle studies. From 1992-2003, women were offered entry into IBIS-I (tamoxifen) and IBIS-II (anastrozole) trials (12.5% of invitees joined). The NICE guidelines ratified the use of tamoxifen and raloxifene (2013) and subsequently anastrozole (2017) for prevention; 10.8% women took up the offer of such treatment between 2013-2020. Since 1994, 7164 eligible women at ≥25% lifetime risk of breast cancer were offered a discussion of risk-reducing breast surgery and 451 (6.2%) had surgery. New approaches in all aspects of the service are needed to build on these results.

Surveillance of women at increased risk of breast cancer using mammography and clinical breast examination: further evidence of benefit.

Women with a significant family history of breast cancer are generally offered early surveillance by mammography and often clinical breast examination (CBE). The evidence base for surveillance has been questioned. We reviewed its effectiveness in terms of tumour size, lymph node status and survival in 7,475 women seen over a 22-year period in the Manchester Family History Clinic. We diagnosed 139 invasive and 26 in situ breast cancers. Seventy-six percent of the invasive cancers were screen detected, 65% node negative and 71% <2 cm in diameter at diagnosis. Twenty-one tumours were BRCA1 positive and were significantly more likely to be grade 3, ER/PR negative (p < 0.0001) and have a poorer survival. CBE contributed to 30% of cancer diagnoses and was responsible for discovery of nine mammographically occult tumours. The cost per quality life year was estimated at £13,080 for tumours detected by CBE and not by mammography. We conclude that screening by annual mammography and CBE between age 35-50 years and 18 monthly from 50 to 60 years may diagnose breast cancer in a less advanced state in terms of size and node status compared with symptomatic cancers and, apart from BRCA1 carriers, is likely to contribute to improved long-term outcome compared with no surveillance.

Red clover isoflavones are safe and well tolerated in women with a family history of breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and tolerability of a standardized 40 mg red clover isoflavone dietary supplement (Promensil, Novogen) in women with a family history of breast cancer to evaluate the feasibility of using the supplement for prevention of breast cancer in healthy women. STUDY DESIGN: Healthy women aged 35-70 years (n = 401) with at least one first-degree relative with breast cancer received red clover isoflavones or placebo for three years in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Participants were assessed clinically and blood samples taken for biochemical analysis every six months. In addition, study participants underwent mammography, bone density and transvaginal ultrasound (postmenopausal women only) once per year. RESULTS: No significant differences in breast density, endometrial thickness, serum cholesterol, follicle stimulating hormone levels and bone mineral density were detected between those taking red clover isoflavones and placebo. In postmenopausal women, some significant differences in bone marker levels were seen between active and placebo groups, at six months and at 12 months. The adverse event profile was similar across all red clover isoflavone and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: This three-year study supports the growing body of evidence that treatment with red clover isoflavones is safe and well tolerated in healthy women. Supplements containing red clover isoflavones did not adversely affect breast density, skeletal strength or cardiovascular status. In postmenopausal women, endometrial status was not adversely affected. The adverse event profile was similar between red clover isoflavones, and placebo and endocrine status did not differ.