Rising above helium: A hydrogen carrier gas chromatography flame ionization detection (GC-FID) method for the simultaneous quantification of toxic alcohols and ethylene glycol in human plasma specimens.

Here we validate a GC, Flame Ionization Detection (GC-FID), liquid injection method using hydrogen as a carrier gas combining analysis of toxic volatile alcohols (VA): methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, acetone, as well as glycols, ethylene glycol (EG) and propylene glycol (PG), in a single method. METHODOLOGY: 200 µL of calibrator, QC, or patient specimen were deproteinized with 400 µL of acetonitrile containing internal standards (10 mmol/L N-propyl alcohol for VA and 2.5 mmol/L 1,2-butanediol for glycols). GC-FID analysis using hydrogen carrier gas and nitrogen makeup gas utilized an Agilent 7890 system equipped with Agilent 7683 liquid autosampler on a 30 m × 530 µm RTX-200 fused silica column. Method validation included repeatability, recovery, carryover, linearity, lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), accuracy, selectivity and measurement uncertainty. RESULTS: The 8.3 min from injection to injection reduced time of analysis by 45% over a previously reported method using Helium carrier gas with no loss in resolution. Within-run and Between-run variability were ≤1.4% and ≤6.8% respectively. Recovery was 100% within a 95% confidence interval. Carryover was negligible for all but EG. LLOQ was <1 mmol/L for all analytes. The upper range of linearity was 120 mmol/L for methanol, ethanol and isopropanol, 100 mmol/L for acetone and 50 mmol/L for EG. Analytes demonstrated acceptable accuracy and measurement uncertainty using College of American Pathologists (CAP) criteria. Toluene can cause a false positive EG, while benzene, xylene and 1,3 butanediol can cause false negative EG. CONCLUSIONS: Converting from Helium to Hydrogen carrier gas benefits patient care through a reduction in turnaround time and provides a cost savings to the laboratory.

One-step extraction and quantitation of toxic alcohols and ethylene glycol in plasma by capillary gas chromatography (GC) with flame ionization detection (FID).

OBJECTIVES: Clinical analysis of volatile alcohols (i.e. methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, and metabolite acetone) and ethylene glycol (EG) generally employs separate gas chromatography (GC) methods for analysis. Here, a method for combined analysis of volatile alcohols and EG is described. DESIGN AND METHODS: Volatile alcohols and EG were extracted with 2:1 (v:v) acetonitrile containing internal standards (IS) 1,2 butanediol (for EG) and n-propanol (for alcohols). Samples were analyzed on an Agilent 6890 GC FID. The method was evaluated for precision, accuracy, reproducibility, linearity, selectivity and limit of quantitation (LOQ), followed by correlation to existing GC methods using patient samples, Bio-Rad QC, and in-house prepared QC material. RESULTS: Inter-day precision was from 6.5-11.3% CV, and linearity was verified from down to 0.6mmol/L up to 150mmol/L for each analyte. The method showed good recovery (~100%) and the LOQ was calculated to be between 0.25 and 0.44mmol/L. Patient correlation against current GC methods showed good agreement (slopes from 1.03-1.12, and y-intercepts from 0 to 0.85mmol/L; R(2)>0.98; N=35). Carryover was negligible for volatile alcohols in the measuring range, and of the potential interferences tested, only toluene and 1,3 propanediol interfered. The method was able to resolve 2,3 butanediol, diethylene glycol, and propylene glycol in addition to the peaks quantified. CONCLUSIONS: Here we describe a simple procedure for simultaneous analysis of EG and volatile alcohols that comes at low cost and with a simple liquid-liquid extraction requiring no derivitization to obtain adequate sensitivity for clinical specimens.