Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Methods Mol Biol ; 1965: 139-153, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31069673

ABSTRACT

Fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, have been traditionally valued as a simple model system due to their easy and inexpensive culture, their relatively compact genome, and the variety of available genetic tools. However, due to similarities of their neurological and developmental pathways with those of vertebrates, Drosophila also offers advantages for developmental toxicity assays. The ability to distinguish the effects of a toxicant on adult females, males, and the developing offspring adds to the usefulness of this model. Here we describe key techniques to screen chemicals and other potential emerging toxicants such as nanoparticles on adult Drosophila female and male reproductive success. In addition, assessments of relative toxicity can be revealed by viability assays at each developmental stage from the embryo to the pharate, or preemergent, adult.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Models, Animal , Nanoparticles/toxicity , Animals , Drosophila melanogaster/drug effects , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Female , Male , Reproduction/drug effects , Toxicity Tests
2.
Hum Genet ; 130(2): 187-201, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21597963

ABSTRACT

X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) results in the differential marking of the active and inactive X with epigenetic modifications including DNA methylation. Consistent with the previous studies showing that CpG island-containing promoters of genes subject to XCI are approximately 50% methylated in females and unmethylated in males while genes which escape XCI are unmethylated in both sexes; our chromosome-wide (Methylated DNA ImmunoPrecipitation) and promoter-targeted methylation analyses (Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation27 array) showed the largest methylation difference (D = 0.12, p < 2.2 E-16) between male and female blood at X-linked CpG islands promoters. We used the methylation differences between males and females to predict XCI statuses in blood and found that 81% had the same XCI status as previously determined using expression data. Most genes (83%) showed the same XCI status across tissues (blood, fetal: muscle, kidney and nerual); however, the methylation of a subset of genes predicted different XCI statuses in different tissues. Using previously published expression data the effect of transcription on gene-body methylation was investigated and while X-linked introns of highly expressed genes were more methylated than the introns of lowly expressed genes, exonic methylation did not differ based on expression level. We conclude that the XCI status predicted using methylation of X-linked promoters with CpG islands was usually the same as determined by expression analysis and that 12% of X-linked genes examined show tissue-specific XCI whereby a gene has a different XCI status in at least one of the four tissues examined.


Subject(s)
CpG Islands/genetics , DNA Methylation/genetics , Organ Specificity/genetics , X Chromosome Inactivation/physiology , Computational Biology , Decision Trees , Female , Humans , Immunoprecipitation , Male , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Sex Factors , Statistics, Nonparametric , X Chromosome Inactivation/genetics
3.
Cancer Res ; 70(22): 9166-74, 2010 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20884631

ABSTRACT

Clinical correlative studies have linked 1p36 deletions with worse prognosis in follicular lymphoma (FL). In this study, we sought to identify the critical gene(s) in this region that is responsible for conferring inferior prognosis. BAC array technology applied to 141 FL specimens detected a minimum region of deletion (MRD) of ∼97 kb within 1p36.32 in 20% of these cases. Frequent single-nucleotide polymorphism-detected copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity was also found in this region. Analysis of promoter CpGs in the MRD did not reveal differential patterns of DNA methylation in samples that differed in 1p36 status. Exon sequencing of MRD genes identified somatic alterations in the TNFRSF14 gene in 3 of 11 selected cases with matching normal DNA. An expanded cohort consisting of 251 specimens identified 46 cases (18.3%) with nonsynonymous mutations affecting TNFRSF14. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were associated with the presence of TNFRSF14 mutation in patients whose overall treatment included rituximab. We further showed that inferior OS and DSS were most pronounced in patients whose lymphomas contained both TNFRSF14 mutations and 1p36 deletions after adjustment for the International Prognostic Index [hazard ratios of 3.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.35-9.878, P=0.011) and 3.19 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-9.57, P=0.039), respectively]. Our findings identify TNFRSF14 as a candidate gene associated with a subset of FL, based on frequent occurrence of acquired mutations and their correlation with inferior clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Lymphoma, Follicular/genetics , Mutation , Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Member 14/genetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Chromosome Deletion , Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1/genetics , Comparative Genomic Hybridization/methods , CpG Islands/genetics , DNA Methylation , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Lymphoma, Follicular/diagnosis , Lymphoma, Follicular/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prognosis , Rituximab
4.
Cell Biol Toxicol ; 26(2): 117-26, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19337845

ABSTRACT

Antifolates, such as methotrexate (MTX), are the treatment of choice for numerous cancers. MTX inhibits dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), which is essential for cell growth and proliferation. Mammalian cells can acquire resistance to antifolate treatment through a variety of mechanisms but decreased antifolate titers due to changes in drug efflux or influx, or alternatively, the amplification of the DHFR gene are the most commonly acquired resistance mechanisms. In Drosophila, however, a resistant phenotype has only been observed to occur by mutation resulting in a MTX-resistant DHFR. It is unclear if differences in gene structure and/or genome organization between Drosophila and mammals contribute to the observed differences in acquired drug resistance. To investigate if gene structure is involved, Drosophila Dhfr cDNA was transfected into a line of CHO cells that do not express endogenous DHFR. These transgenic cells, together with wild-type CHO cells, were selected for 19 months for resistance to increasing concentrations of MTX, from 50- to 200-fold over the initial concentration. Since Drosophila Dhfr appears to have been amplified several fold in the selected transgenic mammalian cells, a difference in genome organization may contribute to the mechanism of MTX resistance.


Subject(s)
CHO Cells/drug effects , Drosophila/genetics , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Selection, Genetic/genetics , Tetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase/genetics , Animals , CHO Cells/enzymology , CHO Cells/physiology , Cell Cycle/drug effects , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drosophila/enzymology , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Folic Acid Antagonists/pharmacology , Gene Amplification/genetics , Methotrexate/pharmacology , Selection, Genetic/drug effects , Tetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase/metabolism , Transfection
5.
Hum Mol Genet ; 18(19): 3544-52, 2009 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19586922

ABSTRACT

Genome-wide levels of DNA methylation vary between tissues, and compared with other tissues, the placenta has been reported to demonstrate a global decrease in methylation as well as decreased methylation of X-linked promoters. Methylation is one of many features that differentiate the active and inactive X, and it is well established that CpG island promoters on the inactive X are hypermethylated. We now report a detailed analysis of methylation at different regions across the X in male and female placenta and blood. A significant (P < 0.001) placental hypomethylation of LINE1 elements was observed in both males and females. Relative to blood placental promoter hypomethylation was only observed for X-linked, not autosomal promoters, and was significant for females (P < 0.0001) not males (P = 0.9266). In blood, X-linked CpG island promoters were shown to have moderate female methylation (66% across 70 assays) and low (23%) methylation in males. A similar methylation pattern in blood was observed for approximately 20% of non-island promoters as well as 50% of the intergenic or intragenic CpG islands, the latter is likely due to the presence of unannotated promoters. Both intragenic and intergenic regions showed similarly high methylation levels in male and female blood (68 and 66%) while placental methylation of these regions was lower, particularly in females. Thus placental hypomethylation relative to blood is observed globally at repetitive elements as well as across the X. The decrease in X-linked placental methylation is consistently greater in females than males and implicates an inactive X specific loss of methylation in the placenta.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Human, X/genetics , DNA Methylation , Placenta/metabolism , X Chromosome Inactivation , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Chromosomes, Human, X/metabolism , CpG Islands , Female , Humans , Long Interspersed Nucleotide Elements , Male , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Young Adult
6.
Cytotechnology ; 57(1): 1-9, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19003167

ABSTRACT

Drosophila research has been and continues to be an essential tool for many aspects of biological scientific research and has provided insight into numerous genetic, biochemical, and behavioral processes. As well, due to the remarkable conservation of gene function between Drosophila and humans, and the easy ability to manipulate these genes in a whole organism, Drosophila research has proven critical for studying human disease and the physiological response to chemical reagents. Methotrexate, a widely prescribed pharmaceutical which inhibits dihydrofolate reductase and therefore folate metabolism, is known to cause teratogenic effects in human fetuses. Recently, there has been resurgence in the use of methotrexate for inflammatory diseases and ectopic or unwanted pregnancies thus, increasing the need to fully understand the cytotoxicity of this pharmaceutical. Concerns have been raised over the ethics of studying teratogenic drugs like methotrexate in mammalian systems and thus, we have proposed a Drosophila model. We have shown that exposure of female Drosophila to methotrexate results in progeny with developmental abnormalities. We have also shown that methotrexate exposure changes the abundance of many fundamental cellular transcripts. Expression of a dihydrofolate reductase with a reduced affinity for methotrexate can not only prevent much of the abnormal transcript profile but the teratogenesis seen after drug treatment. In the future, such studies may generate useful tools for mammalian antifolate "rescue" therapies.

7.
Toxicol Sci ; 99(2): 522-31, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17519396

ABSTRACT

The folic acid analog methotrexate (MTX), a competitive inhibitor of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), is used to treat a variety of cancers and autoimmune disorders. However, MTX also causes a wide range of toxic effects in healthy cells and is an established teratogen. Efforts to "rescue" the defects caused by MTX by administering a folate analog or by transgenic expression of a DHFR with an altered affinity for MTX have been attempted in a variety of mammals but limited protection was conferred. As a result, our understanding of the effect of MTX at the molecular genetic level remains incomplete and, in addition, continued mammalian sacrifice is not ideal. Due to the similarity of teratogenic effects produced by MTX in Drosophila melanogaster these insects were transformed with DHFR alleles to determine if rescue could be achieved. The resulting "MTX-resistant" flies were subsequently used to investigate changes in gene expression in response to MTX using semiquantitative reverse transcription PCR. The majority (12/14) of key transcripts that were affected in MTX-exposed females including transcripts involved in cell cycle, defense response, and transport were "rescued" in the "MTX-resistant" transgenic flies. These studies illustrate the utility of this invertebrate model for the investigation of molecular effects of MTX-induced teratogenicity, MTX-resistant DHFRs for gene therapy techniques, and teratogenic protection.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/prevention & control , Drosophila melanogaster/drug effects , Methotrexate/toxicity , Tetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase/genetics , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Female , Transgenes
8.
Toxicol Sci ; 89(2): 495-503, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16280378

ABSTRACT

Methotrexate (MTX), a synthetic folate analog, is a tight-binding inhibitor of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), a key enzyme for the biosynthesis of purines, thymidylate, and several amino acids. As a consequence, MTX decreases titres of reduced folates, interferes with DNA synthesis, and results in the arrest of rapidly proliferating cells, making it a drug of choice for the treatment of a variety of cancers and auto-immune disorders. MTX is also a known teratogen in all higher animals tested, but there is little information about the effects of this drug on invertebrates. Here we show that MTX has little effect on the survival of Drosophila melanogaster adult flies, but severely diminishes female fecundity. Reduced oviposition, coupled with aberrant egg morphologies, resulted in near sterility of MTX-treated females. Rare surviving progeny showed developmental abnormalities including larval tumors, and bristle, wing, eye, and leg defects. To determine if these phenotypes could be attributed solely to DHFR inhibition, microarray analysis was undertaken and included MTX-treated females, ovaries, and cell line samples. Genes encoding transcripts that were perturbed by the drug were verified using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Many of these genes were involved in cell cycle regulation, signal transduction, transport, defense response, transcription, or various aspects of metabolism. These studies show that MTX treatment has multiple targets and, in addition, provides a new invertebrate model for the study of teratogenesis.


Subject(s)
Folic Acid Antagonists/adverse effects , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/drug effects , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Ovary/drug effects , Oviposition/drug effects , Ovum/drug effects , Animals , Drosophila melanogaster , Female , Fertility/drug effects , Gene Expression Profiling , Male , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Ovary/metabolism , Ovary/ultrastructure , Ovum/ultrastructure
9.
Eur J Pharmacol ; 529(1-3): 71-8, 2006 Jan 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16325803

ABSTRACT

Antifolates, such as methotrexate, are used to inhibit dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), an enzyme essential for the biosynthesis of thymidylate, purines, and several amino acids. DHFR sequences corresponding to mutations found in a methotrexate resistant Drosophila S3 cell line (L30Q), a methotrexate resistant fly population (K31P, Q134K), as well as predicted in silico (L22R) were expressed in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells. The L30Q and L22R DHFRs both conferred resistance to methotrexate. L22R DHFR provided approximately 200-fold resistance to methotrexate when compared to wild-type Drosophila DHFR allowing CHO(L22R) cells to divide in 10 microM methotrexate, a level of resistance not previously observed in any mammalian system. Constructs using this substitution in combination with other Drosophila DHFR specific residues would make excellent candidates for gene therapy and genetic markers in the treatment of certain human disorders.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drug Resistance/genetics , Folic Acid Antagonists/pharmacology , Methotrexate/pharmacology , Mutation , Tetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase/genetics , Animals , CHO Cells , Cloning, Molecular , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Tetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...