Exposure to school-based tobacco prevention interventions in low-income and middle-income countries and its association with psychosocial predictors of smoking among adolescents: a pooled cross-sectional analysis of Global Youth Tobacco Survey data from 38 countries.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of school-based tobacco prevention programme exposure among adolescents in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) and its association with psychosocial predictors of smoking. DESIGN: Analysis of pooled cross-sectional data. SETTING: Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS), conducted in 38 LMICs. PARTICIPANTS: This was a pooled analysis of data involving a total of 132 755 adolescent respondents to GYTS in 38 LMICs across Africa, Europe and Central/South America between 2014 and 2017. EXPOSURE AND OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary independent variable for this study was self-reported exposure to school-based tobacco prevention programmes in the past year. Five psychosocial determinants of smoking were explored as outcomes: perceived addictiveness of nicotine, perceived harm of secondhand smoke exposure, support for restricting cigarette smoking at public indoor locations, support for restricting cigarette smoking at public outdoor areas and self-reported prediction of enjoying cigarette smoking. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between exposure to school-based tobacco prevention programmes and study outcomes, controlling for sociodemographic and smoking-related characteristics of respondents. RESULTS: Overall, 59.1% of adolescents in LMICs self-reported exposure to school-based tobacco prevention programmes. The country-specific prevalence of adolescent exposure to school-based tobacco interventions ranged from 24.9% in the Comoros to 99.3% in Turkmenistan. Exposure to school-based tobacco interventions was significantly associated with greater secondhand smoke harm perceptions (adjusted OR (AOR): 1.69; 95% CI: 1.69 to 1.70), perceptions of addictiveness (AOR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.36 to 1.37) and supporting tobacco use restrictions indoors (AOR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.69 to 1.70) and outdoors (AOR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.59 to 1.60). Exposure to school-based tobacco interventions was associated with lower odds of anticipating enjoying cigarette smoking (AOR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.76). CONCLUSION: Exposure to tobacco prevention programmes in schools is suboptimal in LMICs. Given the protective associations described in this study from school-based tobacco prevention programme exposure, it is imperative that national governments implement school-based programmes into ongoing tobacco control measures.

Changes in dental and medical visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among U.S. children aged 1-17 years.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has tremendously impacted the U.S. healthcare system, but no study has examined the impact of the pandemic on utilization of dental care among U.S. children. Changes in past-year dental versus medical visits and perceived unmet health needs between 2019 and 2020 among U.S. children aged 1-17 years were examined. METHODS: National and state representative, cross-sectional data from the National Survey of Children's Health conducted during June 2019-January 2020 (i.e. pre-pandemic, n = 28 500) and July 2020-January 2021 (i.e. intra-pandemic, n = 41 380) were analysed. Any past-year visit and perceived unmet needs (i.e. delay or inability to receive needed care) were reported by the parent proxy. Weighted prevalence estimates were compared using two-tailed chi-squared tests at p < .05. Poisson regression analyses were used to explore the relationship between having dental and/or medical unmet needs during the pandemic and indicators of poor health and social wellbeing. RESULTS: Between 2019 and 2020, a significantly reduced prevalence of past-year medical (87.2%-81.3%) and dental visits (82.6%-78.2%) among U.S. children aged 1-17 years (all p < .05) were observed. Correspondingly, perceived unmet needs increased by half for dental care (from 2.9% in 2019 to 4.4% in 2020) and almost one-third for medical care (from 3.2% to 4.2% in 2020). Subgroups with the highest prevalence of unmet dental need included those with low socio-economic status, living with their grandparents, uninsured and living with a smoker. CONCLUSIONS: Unmet health needs increased in general but increased more for dental than for medical care among U.S. children aged 1-17 years. Enhanced and sustained efforts will be needed to deliver targeted services towards disadvantaged segments of the population to narrow existing disparities.

E-cigarette advertising exposure among South African adults in 2017: findings from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES: In South Africa, the Control of Tobacco and Electronic Delivery Systems Bill seeks to regulate e-cigarettes as tobacco products, including their advertising, promotion and sponsorship. Population data on e-cigarette advertising in South Africa are needed to inform public health programs, practice and policy. We examined self-reported e-cigarette advertising exposure during 2017. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Household-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: 3063 individuals who participated in the 2017 South African Social Attitudes survey, a nationally representative, in-person survey of the non-institutionalised civilian adult population aged ≥16 years EXPOSURE: 'In the past 12 months, have you seen advertisements or promotions for e-cigarettes (including e-shisha, e-pipe) on any of the following media: newspapers/magazines, billboards, in the malls or any other source?' MAIN OUTCOMES: Beliefs and attitudes regarding e-cigarettes. FINDINGS: Participants' mean age was 37.7 years. Overall, 20.1% reported exposure to e-cigarette advertisements. By age, exposure was most prevalent among those aged 16-19 years (24.6%). Top sources of exposure among those exposed were stores, 40.7%; malls, 30.9%; and television, 32.5%. Of those aware of e-cigarettes, 61.2% believed 'e-cigarette advertisements and promotion may make adolescents think of smoking traditional cigarettes'; 62.7% believed that 'e-cigarette advertisements and promotions may make ex-smokers think of starting smoking cigarettes again'; and 59.5% supported the statement that 'e-cigarette smoking should be banned indoors just as traditional cigarette smoking'. Notably, teens aged 16-19 reported the lowest prevalence (49.0%) of those believing that 'e-cigarette advertisements and promotion may make adolescents think of smoking traditional cigarettes', whereas this percentage was highest among those aged 55-64 years (73.2%). CONCLUSION: Comprehensive regulatory efforts are needed to address e-cigarette advertising, marketing and sponsorship in order to protect public health. The urgent enactment of the new tobacco control legislation, The Control of Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Bill, can help reduce youth exposure to e-cigarette advertising in South Africa.

Effects of Exposure to Tobacco and Electronic Cigarette Advertisements on Tobacco Use: An Analysis of the 2015 National Youth Tobacco Survey.

PURPOSE: Tobacco advertising influences youth smoking behavior. Electronic cigarette (E-cigarette) advertising appears to encourage e-cigarette use among youth. Our aim was to explore the combined effect of exposure to both traditional tobacco advertising and e-cigarette advertising on youth's current use of traditional tobacco products and e-cigarettes. METHODS: Data were obtained from the 2015 National Youth Tobacco Survey (N = 17,711) in the U.S. Three levels of advertising exposure were assessed: none, traditional tobacco-only advertisements, and traditional tobacco and e-cigarette advertisements. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to explore the association between the three advertising exposure categories and current use of tobacco products. RESULTS: Young people reported frequent exposure to traditional tobacco advertising (64.4%) and e-cigarette advertising (38.7%) in 2015. Exposure to any advertising was associated with significantly increased odds of traditional tobacco product use and e-cigarette use. Compared with no exposure to traditional tobacco or e-cigarette advertising, exposure to both (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.51) and exposure to traditional tobacco-only advertising (aOR: 1.34) were associated with significantly higher odds of current use of cigarettes, cigars/cigarillos/little cigars (aOR: 1.62 vs. 1.27) and dual/poly use (aOR: 1.91 vs. 1.31); exposure to both was also associated with significantly higher odds of current e-cigarette (aOR: 1.56) and waterpipe with tobacco (aOR: 1.54) use. CONCLUSIONS: E-cigarette advertising in addition to existing traditional tobacco advertising seems to be associated with the use of tobacco and nicotine products among youth. These findings suggest that stricter regulations for e-cigarette advertising may contribute toward reducing the use of tobacco products among youth.

Associations between public e-cigarette use and tobacco-related social norms among youth.

IMPORTANCE: E-cigarette use in public places may renormalise tobacco use. OBJECTIVE: To measure associations between e-cigarette use in public places and social norms among youth. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: School-based. PARTICIPANTS: 24 353 never tobacco users in US 6th-12th grades who completed the 2016-2017 National Youth Tobacco Surveys. EXPOSURE: Individuals were classified as exposed in public places within the past 30 days to: (1) neither e-cigarette secondhand aerosol (SHA) nor combustible tobacco secondhand smoke (SHS); (2) SHA only; (3) SHS only; and (4) both SHA and SHS. OUTCOMES: Outcomes were overestimation of peer e-cigarette use (a measure of descriptive norms), harm perception and susceptibility. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression (p<0.05). RESULTS: Overall prevalence of SHS and SHA exposure in public places was 46.6% and 18.3%, respectively. SHA exposure in public places was associated with increased odds of overestimating peer e-cigarette use (adjusted OR (AOR): 1.83; 95% CI 1.29 to 2.58) and decreased odds of perceiving e-cigarettes as harmful (AOR: 0.63; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.79), compared with those exposed to neither emission. SHA exposure in public places was also associated with increased susceptibility to using e-cigarettes (AOR: 2.26; 95% CI 1.82 to 2.81) and cigarettes (AOR: 1.51; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.90). E-cigarette harm perception was lower among students in jurisdictions with no comprehensive clean indoor air laws (AOR: 0.79; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.88) or cigarette-only laws (AOR: 0.88; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.99) than in those prohibiting both cigarette and e-cigarette use in public places. CONCLUSIONS: Prohibiting both e-cigarette and cigarette use in public places could benefit public health.

Prevalence and determinants of cigarette smoking relapse among US adult smokers: a longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVES: This research project aims at estimating the prevalence of cigarette smoking relapse and determining its predictors among adult former smokers in the USA. SETTING: This research analysed secondary data retrieved from the Tobacco Use Supplement-Current Population Survey 2010-2011 cohort in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Out of 18 499 participants who responded to the survey in 2010 and 2011, the analysis included a total sample size of 3258 ever smokers, who were living in the USA and reported quitting smoking in 2010. The survey's respondents who never smoked or reported current smoking in 2010 were excluded from the study sample. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Smoking relapse was defined as picking up smoking in 2011 after reporting smoking abstinence in 2010. The prevalence of relapse over the 12-month follow-up period was estimated among different subgroups. Multivariable logistic regression models were applied to determine factors associated with relapse. RESULTS: A total of 184 former smokers reported smoking relapse by 2011 (weighted prevalence 6.8%; 95% CI 5.7% to 8.1%). Prevalence and odds of relapse were higher among young people compared with elders. Former smokers living in smoke-free homes (SFHs) had 60% lower odds of relapse compared with those living in homes that allowed smoking inside (adjusted OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.64). Regarding race/ethnicity, only Hispanics showed significantly higher odds of relapse compared with Whites (non-Hispanics). Odds of relapse were higher among never married, widowed, divorced and separated individuals, compared with the married group. Continuous smoking cessation for 6 months or more significantly decreased odds of relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Wider health determinants, such as race and age, but also living in SFHs showed significant associations with smoking relapse, which could inform the development of more targeted programmes to support those smokers who successfully quit, although further longitudinal studies are required to confirm our findings.

Discordance between perceived and actual tobacco product use prevalence among US youth: a comparative analysis of electronic and regular cigarettes.

IMPORTANCE: Two components of social norms-descriptive (estimated prevalence) and injunctive (perceived acceptability)-can influence youth tobacco use. OBJECTIVE: To investigate electronic cigarettes (e-cigarette) and cigarette descriptive norms and measure the associations between overestimation of e-cigarette and cigarette prevalence and tobacco-related attitudes and behaviours. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: School-based, using paper-and-pencil questionnaires. PARTICIPANTS: US 6th-12th graders participating in the 2015 (n=17 711) and 2016 (n=20 675) National Youth Tobacco Survey. EXPOSURE: Students estimated the percent of their grade-mates who they thought used e-cigarettes and cigarettes; the discordance between perceived versus grade-specific actual prevalence was used to categorise students as overestimating (1) neither product, (2) e-cigarettes only, (3) cigarettes only or (4) both products. OUTCOMES: Product-specific outcomes were curiosity and susceptibility (never users), as well as ever and current use (all students). Descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Statistical significance was at P<0.05. Data were weighted to be nationally representative. RESULTS: More students overestimated cigarette (74.0%) than e-cigarette prevalence (61.0%; P<0.05). However, the associations between e-cigarette-only overestimation and e-cigarette curiosity (adjusted OR (AOR)=3.29), susceptibility (AOR=2.59), ever use (AOR=5.86) and current use (AOR=8.15) were each significantly larger than the corresponding associations between cigarette-only overestimation and cigarette curiosity (AOR=1.50), susceptibility (AOR=1.54), ever use (AOR=2.04) and current use (AOR=2.52). Despite significant declines in actual e-cigarette use prevalence within each high school grade level during 2015-2016, perceived prevalence increased (11th and 12th grades) or remained unchanged (9th and 10th grades). CONCLUSIONS: Four of five US students overestimated peer e-cigarette or cigarette use. Counter-tobacco mass media messages can help denormalise tobacco use.

The relationship between secondhand smoke exposure, pro-tobacco social influences, and smoking susceptibility among nonsmoking Zambian adolescents.

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that the extent of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure among nonsmoking adolescents would be associated with their overall exposure to pro-tobacco social influences. METHODS: Data were analyzed using descriptive and multivariate methods from the 2011 Zambia Global Youth Tobacco Survey. RESULTS: The odds of SHS exposure increased with increasing exposure to pro-tobacco advertisements. About 39.5% of the gap in SHS exposure between nonsmokers with low versus high smoking susceptibility was attributable to differences in parental or peer smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained efforts are needed to denormalize tobacco use in order to reduce youth susceptibility to tobacco use.

Assessment of secondhand smoke exposure at school among U.S. Middle and high school students.

To obtain nationally representative estimates of the prevalence of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure at U.S. schools, we assessed the prevalence and correlates of SHS exposure at school among U.S. middle and high school students using data from the 2011 National Youth Tobacco Survey comprising of 18,866 students spread across all the U.S. states. Overall prevalence of SHS exposure at school was 25.7% (95% CI: [23.6%, 27.8%]). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that having ≥1 smoker friends (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 2.92; p < .001); being a smoker (aOR = 2.75; p < .001); and being aged 13-16 years, or ≥17 years (vs. 9-12 years) significantly increased the likelihood of SHS exposure. Understanding the health risks of SHS exposure alone did not seem to play a significant role in reducing exposure (aOR = .89; p = .342). These findings show there are significant levels of SHS exposure among students at U.S. middle and high schools, and sustained multipronged efforts are needed to reduce youth SHS exposure.

Current frequent cigarette smoking among U.S. middle and high school students, 2000-2011.

UNLABELLED: This study assessed trends in current frequent smoking among United States middle and high school students. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Youth Tobacco Survey (2000-2011). Current frequent smoking was defined as smoking cigarettes on ≥20 days during the past 30 days. Trends were assessed using linear coefficients in a binary logistic regression (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Current frequent cigarette smoking among all students declined between 2000 (6.4%) and 2011 (3.6%) (p < 0.001 for linear trend). Significant declines were observed by age, sex, race/ethnicity, school and grade level. CONCLUSION: Sustained efforts are needed to further reduce youth use of all tobacco products.

Comparison of external beam radiation therapy and radioactive implants in the management of nonmetastatic oral squamous cell cancer: an analysis of the surveillance epidemiology and end results database.

OBJECTIVE: Radiotherapy in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) could be either through external beam (EBRT) or brachytherapy (BT). In third-world countries, access to novel treatment like BT is limited. This study aimed to compare survival in patients with OSCC treated with EBRT with BT recipients. METHODS: We examined cases of nonmetastatic OSCC between January 1, 1987, and December 31, 2007, in the surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) registry. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the adjusted relationship between radiation type and survival. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in survival (adjusted) between patients who were treated with BT and those treated with EBRT (P = .330). However, combining EBRT + BT was associated with significantly better survival compared with EBRT alone (hazard ratios [HR] = 0.61, P < .001) or BT alone (HR = 0.70, P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of BT on survival was not significantly different from EBRT.