Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 20(2): 160-168, feb. 2018. ilus, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-170555

ABSTRACT

Purpose. To report a single-institutional experience with the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy for cancers of the head and neck. Materials and methods. Between October 2014 and October 2016, 18 patients with newly diagnosed cancers of the head and neck were prospectively enrolled on an institutional registry trial investigating the feasibility and efficacy of external-beam radiotherapy delivered using on-board MRI. All patients had biopsy-proven evidence of malignancy, measurable disease, and the ability to provide consent. None had previously received any treatment. Median dose was 70 Gy (range 54-70 Gy). MRI scans were obtained as part of an image-guided registration protocol for alignment prior to and during each treatment. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered to 14 patients (78%). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the University of Washington quality of life instrument. Results. Seventeen of 18 patients completed the planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment of which 15 (83%) had a complete response and 2 (11%) had a partial response based on initial post-therapy positron emission tomography (PET) at 3 months. The 1-year estimates of progression-free survival, overall survival, and local-regional control were 95, 96, and 95%, respectively. There were no treatment-related fatalities. The incidence of grade 3+ acute toxicity was 44%. The proportion of patients rating their health-related quality of life as "very good" or "outstanding" at 6 months and 1 year after completion of radiation therapy was 60 and 70%, respectively. Conclusions. MRI-guided radiotherapy achieves clinical outcomes comparable to contemporary series reporting on IMRT for head and neck cancer (AU)


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Treatment Outcome , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Patient Satisfaction
2.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 20(2): 160-168, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28612199

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report a single-institutional experience with the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy for cancers of the head and neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2014 and October 2016, 18 patients with newly diagnosed cancers of the head and neck were prospectively enrolled on an institutional registry trial investigating the feasibility and efficacy of external-beam radiotherapy delivered using on-board MRI. All patients had biopsy-proven evidence of malignancy, measurable disease, and the ability to provide consent. None had previously received any treatment. Median dose was 70 Gy (range 54-70 Gy). MRI scans were obtained as part of an image-guided registration protocol for alignment prior to and during each treatment. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered to 14 patients (78%). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the University of Washington quality of life instrument. RESULTS: Seventeen of 18 patients completed the planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment of which 15 (83%) had a complete response and 2 (11%) had a partial response based on initial post-therapy positron emission tomography (PET) at 3 months. The 1-year estimates of progression-free survival, overall survival, and local-regional control were 95, 96, and 95%, respectively. There were no treatment-related fatalities. The incidence of grade 3+ acute toxicity was 44%. The proportion of patients rating their health-related quality of life as "very good" or "outstanding" at 6 months and 1 year after completion of radiation therapy was 60 and 70%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided radiotherapy achieves clinical outcomes comparable to contemporary series reporting on IMRT for head and neck cancer.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Survival Rate , Young Adult
3.
Acta Neurochir Suppl ; 101: 163-8, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18642653

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Radiosurgery evolved from brain to spine. Mechanical and computer advances in linear accelerator (LINAC) radiosurgery apply precise single/fractional stereotactic radiation to multiple pathologies. METHODS: During a 10-year span the senior author used proton-beam radiosurgery in over 300 lesions, followed by gamma-knife, adapted and dedicated LINACS, including cyber-knife, in another 700 patients. The last 10 years, experience was accumulated with the Novalis in over 3,000 patients. Novalis uses a beam-shaper in a high-speed delivery LINAC. It operates using conventional circular arc, conformal static beam, dynamic conformal or intensity modulated modes. Patients treated with Novalis at the UCLA since 1997 were evaluated regarding effectiveness, complications and failure. These results were compared with previous 1997 data. RESULTS: Over 4,000 patients with trigeminal neuralgia/intractable pain, arteriovenous malformations/angiomas, metastases, ependymomas, gliomas, meningiomas hemangiopericytomas, schwannomas, adenomas, hemangioblastomas, and chordoma were treated. Spinal lesions were treated with frameless stereotaxis and on-line precision checks. Treatment was expeditious, comfortable and with reduced complications. Success is similar or superior to published data. Reduced treatment time of complex lesions and highly homogeneous dose compares favorably to other radiosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: The senior author's experience validates the novel shaped-beam approach. Long-term follow-up supports safety and effectiveness and capability to treat brain and spine.


Subject(s)
Brain Diseases/pathology , Brain Diseases/surgery , Brain/surgery , Radiosurgery/methods , Spine/surgery , Brain Diseases/classification , Female , Humans , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations , Longitudinal Studies , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Radiosurgery/statistics & numerical data , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Retrospective Studies , Trigeminal Neuralgia/surgery
4.
Minim Invasive Neurosurg ; 49(3): 150-5, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16921455

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively review local control and morbidity following stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for pituitary adenoma. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2004, 39 patients with pituitary adenomas received SRT. Median age was 56 years (range: 13 to 90 years). Thirty-three patients underwent incomplete transsphenoidal surgery prior to SRT and six had unresectable tumors. The largest tumor dimension varied from 1.7 to 6 cm (median: 3 cm). Tumor volume varied from 1.2 to 56 mL (median 10.5 mL). Thirty-five tumors were < or = 1 mm from the optic chiasm/nerve. Thirty-three tumors were non-functional. SRT was delivered by a dedicated linear accelerator (Novalis, Heimstetten, Germany). Beam collimation was achieved by a fixed circular collimator (five patients) or a micro-multileaf collimator (34 patients). Total dose varied from 4500 to 5040 cGy (median: 4860 cGy) and was prescribed at the 90 % isodose line. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 32 months (range: 12 to 94 months), the local control rate was 100 %. Tumor size was stable in 26 patients and decreased in 13 patients. Hormone normalization did not occur following SRT. New endocrine deficiency occurred in six patients. No patient developed cranial nerve injury or second malignancy following treatment. CONCLUSIONS: SRT achieves a high rate of local control and a low rate of treatment-induced morbidity. SRT is applicable to pituitary adenomas in close proximity to the optic apparatus and tumors in excess of three centimeters in the greatest dimension. Further follow-up is necessary to establish the long-term outcome following SRT for pituitary adenomas.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/radiotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Pituitary Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Stereotaxic Techniques , Adenoma/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm, Residual , Pituitary Neoplasms/pathology , Radiotherapy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...