Germline Testing for Veterans with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Concerns about Service-Connected Benefits.

To better understand Veterans' decisions about germline testing, we conducted a single-site, qualitative study of 32 Veterans with advanced prostate cancer. Seven days after oncologist-patient discussions about germline testing, we conducted semi-structured interviews with patients exploring their decision-making process using an interview guide. Four of 14 Veterans with service-connected disability benefits for prostate cancer declined germline testing for fear of losing benefits, as their livelihood depended on these benefits. All 18 Veterans without service-connected benefits agreed to testing. Veterans declining germline testing for this concern can lead to suboptimal cancer care because targeted treatments that could improve their outcomes may go unrecognized. Our findings contributed to new language in the Veterans Benefits Administration Compensation and Pension Manual clarifying that genetic testing showing hereditary predisposition is insufficient to deny service-connected benefits for conditions presumed to be caused by military exposures. Clinicians should communicate this protection when counseling Veterans about genetic testing.

Impact of Posttreatment SPECT/CT on Patient Management During 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.

177Lu can be imaged after administration using SPECT/CT. Most work to date has focused on using posttreatment imaging to measure normal organ and tumor dose. We aimed to assess the impact of posttreatment SPECT/CT on the management of patients undergoing 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT). Methods: In this retrospective study, 122 patients underwent PSMA RPT with subsequent SPECT/CT 24 h after treatment. We determined a qualitative response at each cycle and reviewed patient charts to assess the impact that posttreatment SPECT/CT had on patient management. Changes in patient management were classified as changes on the basis of progression and response, and specific cycles when they occurred were noted. Miscellaneous changes in patient management were also evaluated. Results: Among the 122 consecutive patients examined, 42%-56% exhibited stable disease, whereas 19%-39% of patients exhibited response on visual assessment across treatment cycles. In total, 49% (n = 60) of patients experienced changes in management, of which 57% (n = 34) were due to progression, 40% (n = 24) were due to response, and 3% (n = 2) were due to miscellaneous changes. Changes due to disease progression were observed mostly after cycles 2 and 4. Changes due to response to RPT occurred mostly after cycles 3 and 4. Conclusion: At our center, 49% of patients experienced changes in management based on posttreatment SPECT/CT, and most of these changes occurred at cycles 2 and 4. Integrating posttreatment SPECT/CT into routine PSMA RPT protocols can aid in patient management.

An Atlas of Accessible Chromatin in Advanced Prostate Cancer Reveals the Epigenetic Evolution during Tumor Progression.

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a lethal disease that resists therapy targeting androgen signaling, the primary driver of prostate cancer. mCRPC resists androgen receptor (AR) inhibitors by amplifying AR signaling or by evolving into therapy-resistant subtypes that do not depend on AR. Elucidation of the epigenetic underpinnings of these subtypes could provide important insights into the drivers of therapy resistance. In this study, we produced chromatin accessibility maps linked to the binding of lineage-specific transcription factors (TF) by performing assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing on 70 mCRPC tissue biopsies integrated with transcriptome and whole-genome sequencing. mCRPC had a distinct global chromatin accessibility profile linked to AR function. Analysis of TF occupancy across accessible chromatin revealed 203 TFs associated with mCRPC subtypes. Notably, ZNF263 was identified as a putative prostate cancer TF with a significant impact on gene activity in the double-negative subtype (AR- neuroendocrine-), potentially activating MYC targets. Overall, this analysis of chromatin accessibility in mCRPC provides valuable insights into epigenetic changes that occur during progression to mCRPC. Significance: Integration of a large cohort of transcriptome, whole-genome, and ATAC sequencing characterizes the chromatin accessibility changes in advanced prostate cancer and identifies therapy-resistant prostate cancer subtype-specific transcription factors that modulate oncogenic programs.

Integrated analyses highlight interactions between the three-dimensional genome and DNA, RNA and epigenomic alterations in metastatic prostate cancer.

The impact of variations in the three-dimensional structure of the genome has been recognized, but solid cancer tissue studies are limited. Here, we performed integrated deep Hi-C sequencing with matched whole-genome sequencing, whole-genome bisulfite sequencing, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) sequencing and RNA sequencing across a cohort of 80 biopsy samples from patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Dramatic differences were present in gene expression, 5-methylcytosine/5hmC methylation and in structural variation versus mutation rate between A and B (open and closed) chromatin compartments. A subset of tumors exhibited depleted regional chromatin contacts at the AR locus, linked to extrachromosomal circular DNA (ecDNA) and worse response to AR signaling inhibitors. We also identified topological subtypes associated with stark differences in methylation structure, gene expression and prognosis. Our data suggested that DNA interactions may predispose to structural variant formation, exemplified by the recurrent TMPRSS2-ERG fusion. This comprehensive integrated sequencing effort represents a unique clinical tumor resource.

A Phase II Trial of the WEE1 Inhibitor Adavosertib in SETD2-Altered Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancies (NCI 10170).

We sought to evaluate the efficacy of WEE1 inhibitor adavosertib in patients with solid tumor malignancies (cohort A) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC; cohort B). NCT03284385 was a parallel cohort, Simon two-stage, phase II study of adavosertib (300 mg QDAY by mouth on days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 21-day cycle) in patients with solid tumor malignancies harboring a pathogenic SETD2 mutation. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Correlative assays evaluated the loss of H3K36me3 by IHC, a downstream consequence of SETD2 loss, in archival tumor tissue. Eighteen patients were enrolled (9/cohort). The median age was 60 years (range 45-74). The median duration of treatment was 1.28 months (range 0-24+). No objective responses were observed in either cohort; accrual was halted following stage 1. Minor tumor regressions were observed in 4/18 (22%) evaluable patients. Stable disease (SD) was the best overall response in 10/18 (56%) patients, including three patients with SD > 4 months. One patient with ccRCC remains on treatment for >24 months. The most common adverse events of any grade were nausea (59%), anemia (41%), diarrhea (41%), and neutropenia (41%). Nine patients (50%) experienced a Grade ≥3 adverse event. Of eight evaluable archival tissue samples, six (75%) had a loss of H3K36me3 by IHC. Adavosertib failed to exhibit objective responses in SETD2-altered ccRCC and other solid tumor malignancies although prolonged SD was observed in a subset of patients. Combination approaches may yield greater depth of tumor response. SIGNIFICANCE: WEE1 inhibition with adavosertib monotherapy demonstrated limited clinical activity in patients with SETD2-altered solid tumors despite compelling preclinical data indicating a synthetic lethal effect, which did not translate into robust tumor regression. Loss of the H3K36me3 trimethylation mark caused by SETD2-deficiency was confirmed in the majority of evaluable tumors. A subset of patients derived clinical benefit as manifested by minor tumor regressions and prolonged SD.

Which Test Should I Order for an Inpatient Evaluation of Cardiac Ischemia?

AbstractTesting for cardiac ischemia, or for the obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) that causes cardiac ischemia, is common among hospitalized patients. Many testing options exist. Choosing an appropriate test can be challenging and requires accurate risk stratification. Two major categories of testing are available: stress testing (also known as functional testing) and anatomical testing. Stress testing evaluates specifically for ischemia and can be conducted with or without imaging. Anatomical testing visualizes the obstructive CAD that causes ischemia. This article reviews how to choose an appropriate test for the evaluation of cardiac ischemia in the inpatient setting, using case examples to illustrate the considerations involved.

A prostate cancer gastrointestinal transcriptional phenotype may be associated with diminished response to AR-targeted therapy.

Background: Prostate cancer is a heterogenous disease, but once it becomes metastatic it eventually becomes treatment resistant. One mechanism of resistance to AR-targeting therapy is lineage plasticity, where the tumor undergoes a transformation to an AR-indifferent phenotype, most studied in the context of neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). However, activation of additional de- or trans-differentiation programs, including a gastrointestinal (GI) gene expression program, has been suggested as an alternative method of resistance. In this study, we explored the previously identified GI prostate cancer phenotype (PCa-GI) in a large cohort of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patient biopsy samples. Methods: We analyzed a dataset of 634 mCRPC samples with batch effect corrected gene expression data from the West Coast Dream Team (WCDT), the East Coast Dream Team (ECDT), the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC) and the Weill Cornell Medical center (WCM). Survival data was available from the WCDT and ECDT cohorts. We calculated a gene expression GI score using the sum of z-scores of genes from a published set of PCa-GI-defining genes (N=38). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression with endpoint overall survival from time of biopsy to death of any cause. Results: We found that the PCa-GI score had a bimodal distribution, identifying a distinct set of tumors with an activated GI expression pattern. Approximately 35% of samples were classified as PCa-GI high, which was concordant with prior reports. Liver metastases had the highest median score but after excluding liver samples, 29% of the remaining samples were still classified as PCa-GI high, suggesting a distinct phenotype not exclusive to liver metastases. No correlation was observed between GI score and proliferation, AR signaling, or NEPC scores. Furthermore, the PCa-GI score was not associated with genomic alterations in AR, FOXA1, RB1, TP53 or PTEN. However, tumors with MYC amplifications showed significantly higher GI scores (p=0.0001). Patients with PCa-GI tumors had a shorter survival (HR=1.5 [1.1-2.1], p=0.02), but this result was not significant after adjusting for the liver as metastatic site (HR=1.2 [0.82-1.7], p=0.35). Patients with PCa-GI low samples had a better outcome after androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ASI, abiraterone or enzalutamide) than other therapies (HR=0.37 [0.22-0.61], p=0.0001) while the benefit of ASI was smaller and non-significant for PCa-GI high samples (HR=0.55 [0.29-1.1], p=0.07). A differential pathway analysis identified FOXA2 signaling to be upregulated PCa-GI high tumors (FDR = 3.7 × 10-13). Conclusions: The PCa-GI phenotype is prevalent in clinical mCRPC samples and may represent a distinct biological entity. PCa-GI tumors may respond less to ASI and could offer a strategy to study novel therapeutic targets.

Integrative analysis of ultra-deep RNA-seq reveals alternative promoter usage as a mechanism of activating oncogenic programmes during prostate cancer progression.

Transcription factor (TF) proteins regulate gene activity by binding to regulatory regions, most importantly at gene promoters. Many genes have alternative promoters (APs) bound by distinct TFs. The role of differential TF activity at APs during tumour development is poorly understood. Here we show, using deep RNA sequencing in 274 biopsies of benign prostate tissue, localized prostate tumours and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, that AP usage increases as tumours progress and APs are responsible for a disproportionate amount of tumour transcriptional activity. Expression of the androgen receptor (AR), the key driver of prostate tumour activity, is correlated with elevated AP usage. We identified AR, FOXA1 and MYC as potential drivers of AP activation. DNA methylation is a likely mechanism for AP activation during tumour progression and lineage plasticity. Our data suggest that prostate tumours activate APs to magnify the transcriptional impact of tumour drivers, including AR and MYC.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Targeted StarPEG Nanocarrier for Imaging and Therapy of Prostate Cancer.

The tumor uptake of large non-targeted nanocarriers primarily occurs through passive extravasation, known as the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Prior studies demonstrated improved tumor uptake and retention of 4-arm 40 kDa star polyethylene glycol (StarPEG) polymers for cancer imaging by adding prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting small molecule ligands. To test PSMA-targeted delivery and therapeutic efficacy, StarPEG nanodrugs with/without three copies of PSMA-targeting ligands, ACUPA, are designed and synthesized. For single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging and therapy, each nanocarrier is labeled with 177Lu using DOTA radiometal chelator. The radiolabeled nanodrugs, [177Lu]PEG-(DOTA)1 and [177Lu]PEG-(DOTA)1(ACUPA)3, are evaluated in vitro and in vivo using PSMA+ PC3-Pip and/or PSMA- PC3-Flu cell lines, subcutaneous xenografts and disseminated metastatic models. The nanocarriers are efficiently radiolabeled with 177Lu with molar activities 10.8-15.8 MBq/nmol. Besides excellent in vitro PSMA binding affinity (kD = 51.7 nM), the targeted nanocarrier, [177Lu]PEG-(DOTA)1(ACUPA)3, demonstrated excellent in vivo SPECT imaging contrast with 21.3% ID/g PC3-Pip tumors uptake at 192 h. Single doses of 18.5 MBq [177Lu]PEG-(DOTA)1(ACUPA)3 showed complete resolution of the PC3-Pip xenografts observed up to 138 days. Along with PSMA-targeted excellent imaging contrast, these results demonstrated high treatment efficacy of [177Lu]PEG-(DOTA)1(ACUPA)3 for prostate cancer, with potential for clinical translation.

Assessing Response to PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapies with Single SPECT Imaging at 24 Hours After Injection.

Understanding the relationship between lesion-absorbed dose and tumor response in 177Lu-PSMA-617 radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) remains complex. We aimed to investigate whether baseline lesion-absorbed dose can predict lesion-based responses and to explore the connection between lesion-absorbed dose and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 50 patients with 335 index lesions undergoing 177Lu-PSMA-617 RPT, who had dosimetry analysis performed on SPECT/CT at 24 h after cycles 1 and 2. First, we identified the index lesions for each patient and measured the lesion-based absorbed doses. Lesion-based response was calculated after cycle 2. Additionally, PSA50 response (a decline of 50% from baseline PSA) after cycle 2 was also calculated. The respective responses for mean and maximum absorbed doses and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) volumetric intensity product (VIP-PSMA) at cycles 1 and 2 were termed SPECTmean, SPECTmaximum, and SPECTVIP-PSMA, respectively. Results: Of the 50 patients reviewed, 46% achieved a PSA50 response after cycle 2. Of the 335 index lesions, 58% were osseous, 32% were lymph nodes, and 10% were soft-tissue metastatic lesions. The SPECT lesion-based responses were higher in PSA responders than in nonresponders (SPECTmean response of 46.8% ± 26.1% vs. 26.2% ± 24.5%, P = 0.007; SPECTmaximum response of 45% ± 25.1% vs. 19% ± 27.0%, P = 0.001; SPECTVIP-PSMA response of 49.2% ± 30.3% vs. 14% ± 34.7%, P = 0.0005). An association was observed between PSA response and SPECTVIP-PSMA response (R 2 = 0.40 and P < 0.0001). A limited relationship was found between baseline absorbed dose measured with a 24-h single time point and SPECT lesion-based response (R 2 = 0.05, P = 0.001, and R 2 = 0.03, P = 0.007, for mean and maximum absorbed doses, respectively). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, quantitative lesion-based response correlated with patient-level PSA response. We observed a limited relationship between baseline absorbed dose and lesion-based responses. Most of the variance in response remains unexplained solely by baseline absorbed dose. Establishment of a dose-response relationship in RPT with a single time point at 24 h presented some limitations.

68Ga-FAP-2286 PET of Solid Tumors: Biodistribution, Dosimetry, and Comparison with 18F-FDG.

Fibroblast activation protein (FAP), expressed in the tumor microenvironment of a variety of cancers, has become a target of novel PET tracers. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the imaging characteristics of 68Ga-FAP-2286, present the first-to our knowledge-dosimetry analysis to date, and compare the agent with 18F-FDG and FAPI compounds. Methods: Patients were administered 219 ± 43 MBq of 68Ga-FAP-2286 and scanned after 60 min. Uptake was measured in up to 5 lesions per patient and within the kidneys, spleen, liver, and mediastinum (blood pool). Absorbed doses were evaluated using MIM Encore and OLINDA/EXM version 1.1 using the International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 tissue weighting factor. Results: Forty-six patients were imaged with 68Ga-FAP-2286 PET. The highest average uptake was seen in sarcoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and colon cancer. The lowest uptake was found in lung cancer and testicular cancer. The average SUVmax was significantly higher on 68Ga-FAP-2286 PET than on 18F-FDG PET in cholangiocarcinoma (18.2 ± 6.4 vs. 9.1 ± 5.0, P = 0.007), breast cancer (11.1 ± 6.8 vs. 4.1 ± 2.2, P < 0.001), colon cancer (13.8 ± 2.2 vs. 7.6 ± 1.7, P = 0.001), hepatocellular carcinoma (9.3 ± 3.5 vs. 4.7 ± 1.3, P = 0.01), head and neck cancer (11.3 ± 3.5 vs. 7.6 ± 5.5, P = 0.04), and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (7.4 ± 1.8 vs. 3.7 ± 1.0, P = 0.01). The total-body effective dose was estimated at 1.16E-02 mSv/MBq, with the greatest absorbed organ dose in the urinary bladder wall (9.98E-02 mGy/MBq). Conclusion: 68Ga-FAP-2286 biodistribution, dosimetry, and tumor uptake were similar to those of previously reported FAPI compounds. Additionally,68Ga-FAP-2286 PET had consistently higher uptake than 18F-FDG PET. These results are especially promising in the setting of small-volume disease and differentiating tumor from inflammatory uptake.

Prevalence of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome Stages in US Adults, 2011-2020.

This cross-sectional study assesses the prevalence and temporal evolution of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages.

Freshwater ecotoxicity characterization factors for PMT/vPvM substances.

This study addresses the gap in freshwater ecotoxicological characterization factors (CFs) for Persistent, Mobile, and Toxic (PMT) and Very Persistent and Very Mobile (vPvM) substances. These CFs are vital for integrating the ecotoxicity impacts of these chemicals into life cycle assessments. Our goals are twofold: first, to calculate experimental freshwater CFs for PMT/vPvM substances listed by the German Environment Agency (UBA); second, to compare these CFs with those from the USEtox database. The expanded UBA list includes 343 PMT/vPvM substances, each representing a unique chemical structure, and linked to 474 REACH-registered substances. This study successfully computed CFs for 244 substances, with 107 overlapping the USEtox database and 137 being new. However, ecotoxicity data limitations prevented CF determination for 97 substances. This research enhances our understanding of freshwater CFs for PMT/vPvM substances, covering 72% of UBA's 343 PMT/vPvM substances. Data scarcity remains a significant challenge, which invariably impedes CF calculations. Notably, the disparities observed between CF values in the USEtox database and those derived in this research largely stem from variations in ecotoxicity data. Consequently, this research underscores the dynamic nature of CFs for substances, emphasizing the need for regular updates to ensure their accuracy and relevance.

Development of CD46 targeted alpha theranostics in prostate cancer using 134Ce/225Ac-Macropa-PEG4-YS5.

Rationale: 225Ac, a long-lived α-emitter with a half-life of 9.92 days, has garnered significant attention as a therapeutic radionuclide when coupled with monoclonal antibodies and other targeting vectors. Nevertheless, its clinical utility has been hampered by potential off-target toxicity, a lack of optimized chelators for 225Ac, and limitations in radiolabeling methods. In a prior study evaluating the effectiveness of CD46-targeted radioimmunotherapy, we found great therapeutic efficacy but also significant toxicity at higher doses. To address these challenges, we have developed a radioimmunoconjugate called 225Ac-Macropa-PEG4-YS5, incorporating a stable PEGylated linker to maximize tumoral uptake and increase tumor-to-background ratios. Our research demonstrates that this conjugate exhibits greater anti-tumor efficacy while minimizing toxicity in prostate cancer 22Rv1 tumors. Methods: We synthesized Macropa.NCS and Macropa-PEG4/8-TFP esters and prepared Macropa-PEG0/4/8-YS5 (with nearly ~1:1 ratio of macropa chelator to antibody YS5) as well as DOTA-YS5 conjugates. These conjugates were then radiolabeled with 225Ac in a 2 M NH4OAc solution at 30 °C, followed by purification using YM30K centrifugal purification. Subsequently, we conducted biodistribution studies and evaluated antitumor activity in nude mice (nu/nu) bearing prostate 22Rv1 xenografts in both single-dose and fractionated dosing studies. Micro-PET imaging studies were performed with 134Ce-Macropa-PEG0/4/8-YS5 in 22Rv1 xenografts for 7 days. Toxicity studies were also performed in healthy athymic nude mice. Results: As expected, we achieved a >95% radiochemical yield when labeling Macropa-PEG0/4/8-YS5 with 225Ac, regardless of the chelator ratios (ranging from 1 to 7.76 per YS5 antibody). The isolated yield exceeded 60% after purification. Such high conversions were not observed with the DOTA-YS5 conjugate, even at a higher ratio of 8.5 chelators per antibody (RCY of 83%, an isolated yield of 40%). Biodistribution analysis at 7 days post-injection revealed higher tumor uptake for the 225Ac-Macropa-PEG4-YS5 (82.82 ± 38.27 %ID/g) compared to other conjugates, namely 225Ac-Macropa-PEG0/8-YS5 (38.2 ± 14.4/36.39 ± 12.4 %ID/g) and 225Ac-DOTA-YS5 (29.35 ± 7.76 %ID/g). The PET Imaging of 134Ce-Macropa-PEG0/4/8-YS5 conjugates resulted in a high tumor uptake, and tumor to background ratios. In terms of antitumor activity, 225Ac-Macropa-PEG4-YS5 exhibited a substantial response, leading to prolonged survival compared to 225Ac-DOTA-YS5, particularly when administered at 4.625 kBq doses, in single or fractionated dose regimens. Chronic toxicity studies observed mild to moderate renal toxicity at 4.625 and 9.25 kBq doses. Conclusions: Our study highlights the promise of 225Ac-Macropa-PEG4-YS5 for targeted alpha particle therapy. The 225Ac-Macropa-PEG4-YS5 conjugate demonstrates improved biodistribution, reduced off-target binding, and enhanced therapeutic efficacy, particularly at lower doses, compared to 225Ac-DOTA-YS5. Incorporating theranostic 134Ce PET imaging further enhances the versatility of macropa-PEG conjugates, offering a more effective and safer approach to cancer treatment. Overall, this methodology has a high potential for broader clinical applications.

A Phase 1/2 multicenter trial of DKN-01 as monotherapy or in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

BACKGROUND: Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK1) is a Wingless-related integrate site (Wnt) signaling modulator that is upregulated in prostate cancers (PCa) with low androgen receptor expression. DKN-01, an IgG4 that neutralizes DKK1, delays PCa growth in pre-clinical DKK1-expressing models. These data provided the rationale for a clinical trial testing DKN-01 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC). METHODS: This was an investigator-initiated parallel-arm phase 1/2 clinical trial testing DKN-01 alone (monotherapy) or in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (combination) for men with mCRPC who progressed on ≥1 AR signaling inhibitors. DKK1 status was determined by RNA in-situ expression. The primary endpoint of the phase 1 dose escalation cohorts was the determination of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The primary endpoint of the phase 2 expansion cohorts was objective response rate by iRECIST criteria in patients treated with the combination. RESULTS: 18 pts were enrolled into the study-10 patients in the monotherapy cohorts and 8 patients in the combination cohorts. No DLTs were observed and DKN-01 600 mg was determined as the RP2D. A best overall response of stable disease occurred in two out of seven (29%) evaluable patients in the monotherapy cohort. In the combination cohort, five out of seven (71%) evaluable patients had a partial response (PR). A median rPFS of 5.7 months was observed in the combination cohort. In the combination cohort, the median tumoral DKK1 expression H-score was 0.75 and the rPFS observed was similar between patients with DKK1 H-score ≥1 versus H-score = 0. CONCLUSION: DKN-01 600 mg was well tolerated. DKK1 blockade has modest anti-tumor activity as a monotherapy for mCRPC. Anti-tumor activity was observed in the combination cohorts, but the response duration was limited. DKK1 expression in the majority of mCRPC is low and did not clearly correlate with anti-tumor activity of DKN-01 plus docetaxel.