ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Different techniques are used to fix crimp and CliP® Piston stapes prostheses to the long process of the incus (LPI). The CliP® Piston provides a stiff connection in contrast to the static bended loop of the crimp prosthesis, which imitates the physiological incudostapedial joint (ISJ) and thereby potentially leads to different hearing outcome. METHODS: In a retrospective single-center study of German-speaking one hundred and ninety patients who underwent stapes surgery CliP® Piston or crimp prostheses between the years of 2016 and 2019 by the same surgeon and in the same setting. Pre- and postoperative bone- (BC) and air-conduction (AC) pure-tone thresholds, pre- and postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) for 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 kHz and the surgery time were examined. RESULTS: The postoperative bone conduction thresholds were significantly lower in the frequencies between 0.5 and 3 kHz and the mean ABG was < 10 dB in most cases independent of the prosthesis used. Crimp prosthesis showed a significantly better closure of the ABG at 0.5 kHz. CONCLUSIONS: The audiological outcome after stapes surgery is dependent on the type of prosthesis used, as reflected by the frequency-specific air-bone gap. The better ABG closure with the crimp prosthesis might be the result of the connection to the LPI imitating the physiological ISJ. The crimp prosthesis may be the better choice if use of hearing aids is expected postoperatively.
Subject(s)
Ossicular Prosthesis , Otosclerosis , Stapes Surgery , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Prosthesis Implantation , Stapes Surgery/methods , Hearing , Stapes , Bone Conduction , Treatment Outcome , Otosclerosis/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ear surgery (EES) has become firmly established internationally. In Germany this technology is controversially discussed and used very differently. Therefore, a survey was carried out on the availability, indications, contraindications, and future significance of EES. METHODS: A questionnaire with 20 questions was sent to 141 German university and central departments of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery. The results are discussed on the basis of current literature retrieved in a search of PubMed and Google Scholar. RESULTS: The response rate was 32% (45 clinics). Of these respondents, 27 clinics (60%) stated that EES was usually carried out as an accompanying measure. Only one clinic performed ear surgery endoscopically alone. In cases of intraoperative bleeding, mastoid drilling, or if bimanual work was required, the surgeons switched to microscopic ear surgery (MES). The most common indications for EES were tympanoscopy, cholesteatoma, retraction pockets, and interventions on the tympanic membrane and external auditory canal. The necessary resources for EES were estimated to be higher than for MES in 49-50% of the responding clinics. Tragus cartilage dominated as the graft material for reconstruction in EES clinics, at 78%. Only 4 of 45 responding clinics rated the future significance of ESS in Germany as high. CONCLUSION: Although EES is used in Germany, only few ENT clinics use it extensively. Reservations relate to one-handed working, drilling, management of bleeding, and the expected high resource demand. Thus, EES in Germany is often performed as an accompanying procedure, with switching between EES and MES.
Subject(s)
Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear , Otologic Surgical Procedures , Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear/surgery , Ear Canal , Endoscopy , Germany , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was the evaluation of a synthetic version of the Digits-in-Noise (DiN) in participants with normal hearing. Additionally, the basis characteristics of the DiN in CI recipients were investigated. DESIGN AND STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty participants with normal hearing and 21 CI recipients with a Nucleus®-System ran two to three adaptive and up to five fixed measurements. Afterwards the discrimination function was measured with fixed signal-to-noise ratios. RESULTS: All subjects were able to perform the DiN within three minutes per test run. The median speech reception threshold (SRT) for the NH was -8.1 dBSNR, with a median steepness of 23%/dBSNR. The median absolute test-retest difference in the NH group was 0.4 dB (range: 0 to 1.5 dB). In the CI group, the SRTs range from -6.6 to +12.4 dBSNR with a median test-retest difference of 0.4 dB (range: 0 to 6.1 dB). CONCLUSION: The synthetic DiN is a valuable complement of the audiometric test battery in CI recipients. The excellent applicability is also particularly helpful in poor performing CI recipients. With its small time exposure, it is a time- and cost-saving test, which could also be used at home via app to check the individual hearing success.
Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Audiometry , Hearing Tests , Humans , Noise/adverse effects , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Speech Reception Threshold TestABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The role of sensitive parts of the cervical plexus for the development of neuropathic pain is not yet clear. Our study investigated the correlation between shoulder pain and cervical plexus damage after different types of neck dissection (ND). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sensitivity for warm/cold and sharp/blunt was tested in the dermatomes of C2, C3, C4, and the minor occipital nerve. Shoulder pain was measured semiquantitatively by a rating scale. RESULTS: Motion-dependent shoulder pain was observed 6 months postoperatively in 50% after resection and in 29.2% after preservation of these structures. Pain occurred more frequently following radical ND than after modified radical types 1 and 3 ND. DISCUSSION: Our investigations showed that the superficial cervical plexus function is assessable by cutaneous sensitivity tests. The minor occipital nerve seemed to be less affected. Fewer pain symptoms in cases with preserved cervical plexus could be demonstrated. We can conclude that preservation of the superficial cervical plexus is important to diminish postoperative shoulder pain.
