The Effect of Subcutaneous Epinephrine Dosage on Blood Loss in Surgical Incisions.

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine is commonly used in plastic and reconstructive surgeries to reduce the blood loss, and to achieveing the lowest and the most effective dosage of epinephrine can improve the results of the surgery. METHODS: Thirty two rats were divided in four groups. Local injection of epinephrine solution (3 mL) with concentrations of 1:200,000, 1:400,000 and 1:1,000,000 was undertaken in three different groups; and the fourth group was the control in which 3 mL of normal saline was administered 15 minutes before making the incision. The bleeding amount was compared in these groups. RESULTS: A significant difference in blood loss was noted between the control and other groups, but no significant difference was present between epinephrine concentrations of 1:200,000, 1:400,000 and 1:1,000,000. CONCLUSION: Local injection of epinephrine solution was shown to reduce bleeding from surgical incisions, but the difference between various pinephrine concentrations was not significant. The use of the lowest concentration (1:1,000,000) was suggested to decrease epinephrine side effects.

[A randomized, double blind trial of prophylactic fibrinogen to reduce bleeding in cardiac surgery]. / Estudo randômico e duplo-cego de profilaxia com fibrinogênio para reduzir o sangramento em cirurgia cardíaca.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Postoperative bleeding has a great clinical importance and can contribute to increased mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we evaluated the effect of prophylactic administration of fibrinogen concentrate on post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery bleeding. METHODS: A total of 60 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the fibrinogen group received 1g of fibrinogen concentrate 30min prior to the operation, while patients in the control group received placebo. Post-operative bleeding volumes, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, INR, hemoglobin and transfused blood products in both groups were recorded. A strict red blood cell transfusion protocol was used in all patients. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between intra-operative packed red blood cells infusion in the studied groups (1.0±1.4 in fibrinogen group, and 1.3±1.1 in control group). Less postoperative bleeding was observed in the fibrinogen group (477±143 versus 703±179, p=0.0001). Fifteen patients in the fibrinogen group and 21 in the control group required post-op packed red blood cells infusion (p=0.094). No thrombotic event was observed through 72h after surgery. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic fibrinogen reduces post-operative bleeding in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft.

A randomized, double blind trial of prophylactic fibrinogen to reduce bleeding in cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Postoperative bleeding has a great clinical importance and can contribute to increased mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we evaluated the effect of prophylactic administration of fibrinogen concentrate on post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery bleeding. METHODS: A total of 60 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the fibrinogen group received 1g of fibrinogen concentrate 30 min prior to the operation, while patients in the control group received placebo. Post-operative bleeding volumes, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, INR, hemoglobin and transfused blood products in both groups were recorded. A strict red blood cell transfusion protocol was used in all patients. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between intra-operative packed red blood cells infusion in the studied groups (1.0±1.4 in fibrinogen group, and 1.3±1.1 in control group). Less postoperative bleeding was observed in the fibrinogen group (477±143 versus 703±179, p=0.0001). Fifteen patients in the fibrinogen group and 21 in the control group required post-op packed red blood cells infusion (p=0.094). No thrombotic event was observed through 72 h after surgery. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic fibrinogen reduces post-operative bleeding in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft.

A randomized, double blind trial of prophylactic fibrinogen to reduce bleeding in cardiac surgery / Estudo randômico e duplo-cego de profilaxia com fibrinogênio para reduzir o sangramento em cirurgia cardíaca / Estudio aleatorizado y doble ciego de profilaxis con fibrinógeno para reducir el sangrado en cirugía cardíaca

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Postoperative bleeding has a great clinical importance and can contribute to increased mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we evaluated the effect of prophylactic administration of fibrinogen concentrate on post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery bleeding. METHODS: A total of 60 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the fibrinogen group received 1 g of fibrinogen concentrate 30 min prior to the operation, while patients in the control group received placebo. Post-operative bleeding volumes, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, INR, hemoglobin and transfused blood products in both groups were recorded. A strict red blood cell transfusion protocol was used in all patients. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between intra-operative packed red blood cells infusion in the studied groups (1.0 ± 1.4 in fibrinogen group, and 1.3 ± 1.1 in control group). Less postoperative bleeding was observed in the fibrinogen group (477 ± 143 versus 703 ± 179, p = 0.0001). Fifteen patients in the fibrinogen group and 21 in the control group required post-op packed red blood cells infusion (p = 0.094). No thrombotic event was observed through 72 h after surgery. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic fibrinogen reduces post-operative bleeding in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft. .

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVO: a hemorragia no período pós-operatório é de grande importância clínica e pode contribuir para o aumento da morbidade e mortalidade em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de revascularização coronária. Nesse estudo prospectivo, randômico e duplo-cego, avaliamos o efeito da administração profilática de concentrado de fibrinogênio sobre o sangramento após cirurgia de revascularização coronária. MÉTODOS: no total, 60 pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de revascularização coronária foram randomicamente divididos em dois grupos. Os pacientes do grupo fibrinogênio receberam 1 g de concentrado de fibrinogênio 30 minutos antes da operação, enquanto os doentes do grupo controle receberam placebo. Os volumes de sangramento no pós-operatório, tempo de protrombina, tempo de tromboplastina parcial, INR, hemoglobina e hemoderivados transfundidos em ambos os grupos foram registrados. Um protocolo de conduta rigoroso para transfusão de hemácias foi usado em todos os pacientes. RESULTADOS: não houve diferenças significantes entre as infusões de concentrados de hemácias nos grupos estudados (1,0 ± 1,4 no grupo fibrinogênio e 1,3 ± 1,1 no grupo controle). O grupo fibrinogênio apresentou menos sangramento no pós-operatório (477 ± 143 versus 703 ± 179, p = 0,0001). Quinze pacientes do grupo fibrinogênio e 21 do grupo controle precisaram de infusão de concentrado de hemácias no pós-operatório (p = 0,094). Evento trombótico não foi observado durante 72 h após a cirurgia. CONCLUSÃO: profilaxia com fibrinogênio reduz o sangramento no período pós-operatório de pacientes submetidos à revascularização coronária. .

JUSTIFICACIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: la hemorragia en el período postoperatorio es de gran importancia clínica y puede contribuir al aumento de la morbimortalidad en pacientes sometidos a cirugía de revascularización del miocardio. En este estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado y doble ciego, evaluamos el efecto de la administración profiláctica del concentrado de fibrinógeno sobre el sangrado después de la cirugía de revascularización del miocardio. MÉTODOS: en total, 60 pacientes sometidos a cirugía de revascularización del miocardio fueron aleatoriamente divididos en 2 grupos. Los pacientes del grupo fibrinógeno recibieron 1 g de concentrado de fibrinógeno 30 min antes de la operación, mientras que los del grupo control recibieron placebo. Los volúmenes de sangrado en el postoperatorio, tiempo de protrombina, tiempo de tromboplastina parcial, INR, hemoglobina y hemoderivados transfundidos en ambos grupos fueron registrados. En todo los pacientes se usó un protocolo de conducta riguroso para la transfusión de hematíes. RESULTADOS: no hubo diferencias significativas entre las infusiones de concentrados de hematíes en los grupos estudiados (1 ± 1,4 en el grupo fibrinógeno y 1,3 ± 1,1 en el grupo control). El grupo fibrinógeno presentó menos sangrado en el postoperatorio (477 ± 143 versus 703 ± 179, p = 0,0001). Quince pacientes del grupo fibrinógeno y 21 del grupo control necesitaron infusión de concentrado de hematíes en el postoperatorio (p = 0,094). Ningún evento trombótico fue observado durante 72 h después de la cirugía. CONCLUSIÓN: la profilaxis con fibrinógeno reduce el sangrado en el período postoperatorio de pacientes sometidos a revascularización del miocardio. .

Ondansetron reducing pain on injection of etomidate: a controlled randomized study.

INTRODUCTION: Etomidate causes pain when injected intravenously. In this study we sought to determine if pretreatment by ondansetron reduces the pain on injection of etomidate. METHODS: In this randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 20 patients of both sexes aged between 18 and 50 years of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I or II, whom were candidates for various elective surgical procedures and need more than one intravenous access were enrolled in the study. On arrival to the operating room two 22 gauge cannulas were inserted into veins on the dorsum of both hands. Following the infusion of 100mL normal saline into both intravenous lines, using an elastic band, venous drainage of hands was occluded at midarm. The patients were administered 8 mg (2 mL) of ondansetron into one hand and 2 mL of 0.9% saline into the other hand at the same time. The elastic band was removed after 1 min and 2mg (1 mL) of etomidate was administered at the same rate simultaneously into intravenous lines. The patients were asked to give a score of pain based on a verbal analog scale (VAS) to each hand. RESULTS: A total number of 20 patients were studied (male = 55%, female = 45%). The mean age of the participants was 37.5 ± 13.1 years old and the mean weight was 67.7 ± 7.3 kg. The mean VAS for injection pain of etomidate after pre-administration of intravenous ondansetron was 1.5 ± 1.2 which was lower compared to pre-administration of placebo (3.2 ± 2.8, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study illustrates that pre-treatment with intravenous ondansetron significantly reduces the pain on injection of etomidate.

Ondansetron reducing pain on injection of etomidate: a controlled randomized study / Ondansetrona reduz a dor da injeção de etomidato: estudo randômico controlado / El ondansetrón reduce el dolor de la inyección de etomidato: estudio aleatorizado controlado

Introduction: Etomidate causes pain when injected intravenously. In this study we sought to determine if pretreatment by ondansetron reduces the pain on injection of etomidate. Methods: In this randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 20 patients of both sexes aged between 18 and 50 years of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I or II, whom were candidates for various elective surgical procedures and need more than one intravenous access were enrolled in the study. On arrival to the operating room two 22 gauge cannulas were inserted into veins on the dorsum of both hands. Following the infusion of 100 mL normal saline into both intravenous lines, using an elastic band, venous drainage of hands was occluded at midarm. The patients were administered 8 mg (2 mL) of ondansetron into one hand and 2 mL of 0.9% saline into the other hand at the same time. The elastic band was removed after 1 min and 2 mg (1 mL) of etomidate was administered at the same rate simultaneously into intravenous lines. The patients were asked to give a score of pain based on a verbal analog scale (VAS) to each hand. Results: A total number of 20 patients were studied (male = 55%, female = 45%). The mean age of the participants was 37.5 ± 13.1 years old and the mean weight was 67.7 ± 7.3 kg. The mean VAS for injection pain of etomidate after pre-administration of intravenous ondansetron was 1.5 ± 1.2 which was lower compared to pre-administration of placebo (3.2 ± 2.8, p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study illustrates that pre-treatment with intravenous ondansetron significantly reduces the pain on injection of etomidate. .

Justificativa e objetivo: etomidato causa dor quando administrado por via intravenosa. Neste estudo buscamos determinar se o pré-tratamento com ondansetrona reduz a dor causada pela injeção de etomidato. Métodos: neste estudo clínico randômico, duplo-cego e controlado por placebo, 20 pacientes de ambos os sexos, entre 18 e 50 anos, estado físico ASA I ou II, candidatos a procedimentos cirúrgicos eletivos que exigiam mais de um acesso intravenoso, foram incluídos. Ao darem entrada na sala de cirurgia, duas cânulas de calibre 22 foram inseridas nas veias do dorso de ambas as mãos. Após a infusão de 100 mL de solução salina normal em ambas as linhas de acesso intravenoso, a drenagem venosa das mãos foi ocluída até o meio do braço com o uso de um torniquete elástico. Os pacientes receberam 8 mg (2 mL) de ondansetrona em uma das mãos e 2 mL de solução salina a 0,9% na outra mão ao mesmo tempo. O torniquete foi removido após um minuto e 2 mg (1 mL) de etomidato foram administrados na mesma proporção simultaneamente nas linhas intravenosas. Pediu-se aos pacientes que dessem pontos à dor em cada mão, com base em uma escala verbal analógica (EVA). Resultados: avaliamos 20 pacientes (homens = 55%, mulheres = 45%). A média de idade e de peso foi de 37,5 ± 13,1 anos e 67,7 ±7,3 kg. A média do escore EVA para dor causada pela injeção de etomidato após a pré-administração de ondansetron IV foi de 1,5 ± 1,2, que foi menor em comparação com a pré-administração de placebo (3,2 ± 2,8, p < 0,05). Conclusão: este estudo mostra que o pré-tratamento com ondansetrona IV reduz significativamente a dor causada pela injeção de etomidato. .

Introducción: el etomidato causa dolor cuando es administrado por vía intravenosa. En este estudio buscamos determinar si el pretratamiento con ondansetrón reduce el dolor causado por la inyección de etomidato. Métodos: fueron incluidos en este estudio clínico aleatorizado, doble ciego y controlado por placebo, 20 pacientes de ambos sexos con edades entre 18 y 50 años, estado físico ASA I o II, candidatos a varios procedimientos quirúrgicos electivos, que exigían más de un acceso intravenoso. Al entrar en quirófano, se insertaron dos cánulas de calibre 22 en las venas del dorso de ambas manos. Después de la infusión de 100 mL de solución salina normal en ambas líneas de acceso intravenoso; usando un torniquete elástico, el drenaje venoso de las manos se cerró hasta la mitad del brazo. Los pacientes recibieron 8 mg (2 mL) de ondansetrón en una de las manos y 2 mL de solución salina al 0,9% en la otra mano al mismo tiempo. El torniquete fue retirado después de 1 min y 2 mg (1 mL) de etomidato se administró en la misma proporción simultáneamente en las líneas intravenosas. Se les solicitó a los pacientes que hiciesen una puntuación del dolor en cada mano, basándose en una escala verbal analógica (EVA). Resultados: evaluamos a un total de 20 pacientes (un 55% hombres y un 45% mujeres). La media de edad y del peso de los participantes fue de 37,5 ± 13,1 años y de 67,7 ±7,3/kg, respectivamente. El promedio de la puntuación EVA para el dolor causado por la inyección de etomidato después de la preadministración de ondansetrón iv fue de 1,5 ± 1,2, siendo menor en comparación con la preadministración de placebo (3,2 ± 2,8; p < 0,05). Conclusión: este estudio demuestra que el pretratamiento con ondansetrón iv reduce ...

Comparing Two Different Doses of Intravenous Ondansetron With Placebo on Attenuation of Spinal-induced Hypotension and Shivering.

BACKGROUND: Side effects of spinal anesthesia are hypotension, bradycardia and shivering. Five-hydroxytriptamine (5-HT), a serotonergic receptor, may be an important factor associated with inducing the Bezold Jarish reflex (BJR) that may lead to the bradycardia and hypotension in the setting of decreased blood volume. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the effect of intravenous administration of ondansetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, which could attenuate spinal-induced hypotension, bradycardia and shivering. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and ten patients aged 20-50 years old were scheduled for spinal anesthesia and were divided randomly into three equal groups. The control group received normal saline and intervention groups received 6 mg or 12 mg of intravenous ondansetron 5 minutes before spinal anesthesia. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and shivering were recorded before and after spinal anesthesia every 5 minutes during first 20 minutes of surgery. RESULTS: Demographic data were not statistically different among groups. HR was statistically different between the experimental groups and the control group. Ten patients (14%) in the control group had HR < 50 bpm, that required intravenous atropine compared to experimental groups (P =0.02). In the control group 12 (17%) patients had MAP < 80 mm Hg and required vasopressors compared to experimental groups (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in MAP and HR between the experimental groups (P =0.06). Incidence of shivering in the control group was 45% (32.70) that was statistically more than experimental groups (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of two different doses of intravenous ondansetron, 6 mg and 12 mg, significantly attenuates spinal induced hypotension, bradycardia and shivering compared to the control saline group. However, the hemodynamic profiles and shivering in experimental groups were not statistically different.