ABSTRACT
Non- missile penetrating spinal injury (NMPSI) is a rare entity in North America and as a result there is no clear treatment paradigm. According to the literature, NMPSI causes serious acute neurological deficits and can also lead to devastating delayed complications in cases of untreated retained foreign bodies (RFB). In this report we present an acute case of NMPSI to the thoracic spine resulting in RFB treated by operative removal using minimally invasive fluoroscopic technique. While in prior published cases of NMPSI operative intervention was accomplished through laminectomy, our case presents an alternative, less invasive approach which may results in shorter recovery time. We also review the literature on NMPSI, including reports on both acute cases and chronic presentation due to RFBs. Based on this review, we conclude that NMPSI associated with RFB should be managed with operative intervention.
Subject(s)
Foreign Bodies/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Spinal Injuries/surgery , Wounds, Stab/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Foreign Bodies/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Spinal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Stab/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: An automatic radiographic labeling algorithm called "LevelCheck" was analyzed as a means of decision support for target localization in spine surgery. The potential clinical utility and scenarios in which LevelCheck is likely to be the most beneficial were assessed in a retrospective clinical data set (398 cases) in terms of expert consensus from a multi-reader study (three spine surgeons). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential utility of the LevelCheck algorithm for vertebrae localization. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Three hundred ninety-eight intraoperative radiographs and 178 preoperative computed tomographic (CT) images for patients undergoing spine surgery in cervical, thoracic, lumbar regions. METHODS: Vertebral labels annotated in preoperative CT image were overlaid on intraoperative radiographs via 3D-2D registration. Three spine surgeons assessed the radiographs and LevelCheck labeling according to a questionnaire evaluating performance, utility, and suitability to surgical workflow. Geometric accuracy and registration run time were measured for each case. RESULTS: LevelCheck was judged to be helpful in 42.2% of the cases (168/398), to improve confidence in 30.6% of the cases (122/398), and in no case diminished performance (0/398), supporting its potential as an independent check and assistant to decision support in spine surgery. The clinical contexts for which the method was judged most likely to be beneficial included the following scenarios: images with a lack of conspicuous anatomical landmarks; level counting across long spine segments; vertebrae obscured by other anatomy (e.g., shoulders); poor radiographic image quality; and anatomical variations/abnormalities. The method demonstrated 100% geometric accuracy (i.e., overlaid labels within the correct vertebral level in all cases) and did not introduce ambiguity in image interpretation. CONCLUSION: LevelCheck is a potentially useful means of decision support in vertebral level localization in spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
Subject(s)
Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Spine/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , AlgorithmsSubject(s)
Anesthesia, Local/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Neuroendoscopy/methods , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Sarcoma, Ewing/surgery , Spinal Neoplasms/surgery , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Adolescent , Conscious Sedation/methods , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Sarcoma, Ewing/pathology , Spinal Neoplasms/pathology , Thoracic Vertebrae/pathologyABSTRACT
We present two cases of biopsy-proven neoplastic lumbosacral plexopathy from perineural spread of bladder cancer: one patient presented with predominantly sciatic nerve involvement and the second predominantly with obturator nerve involvement. These two patterns of perineural spread from bladder cancer were supported by imaging in our cases and solidified by review of the literature. Based on the innervation of the bladder, we provide an anatomic explanation for this observation. To our best knowledge, such an anatomic, mechanistic basis for perineural tumor spread in bladder cancer has not yet been described.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Humans , Lumbosacral Plexus/pathology , Male , Peripheral Nerves/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/radiotherapyABSTRACT
Penetrating cranial injury by mechanisms other than gunshots are exceedingly rare, and so strategies and guidelines for the management of PBI are largely informed by data from higher-velocity penetrating injuries. Here, we present a case of penetrating brain injury by the low-velocity mechanism of a harpoon from an underwater fishing speargun in an attempted suicide by a 56-year-old Caucasian male. The case raised a number of interesting points in management of low-velocity penetrating brain injury (LVPBI), including benefit in delaying foreign body removal to allow for tamponade; the importance of history-taking in establishing the social/legal significance of the events surrounding the injury; the use of cerebral angiogram in all cases of PBI; advantages of using dual-energy CT to reduce artifact when available; and antibiotic prophylaxis in the context of idiosyncratic histories of usage of penetrating objects before coming in contact with the intracranial environment. We present here the management of the case in full along with an extended discussion and review of existing literature regarding key points in management of LVPBI vs. higher-velocity forms of intracranial injury.
