Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 39
Filter
2.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 68(1): 1-7, 2024 01 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37776568

ABSTRACT

In May 2023 the World Health Organization (WHO) Director General announced the "end" of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Although the scale of the pandemic was unprecedented in living memory, it had not been unforeseen. Previous outbreaks of viral respiratory disease have shown important lessons regarding the need to protect healthcare workers (HCW), and research has also been undertaken into the relative effectiveness of control measures and their resource implications. Relevant guidance for worker protection, including HCW protection, which existed at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic was disregarded both at international and national governmental levels. In many countries there were significant systemic flaws in strategy, culture, and resource availability, and hence in overall preparedness. When the pandemic struck, many experts and organizations advocated a precautionary approach with regard to worker protection, consistent with good occupational hygiene science, practice, and standards. In many Asian countries, protective measures were relatively stringent. However, many workers were left unprotected especially as the WHO, the United States, the United Kingdom, and other governments did not pursue adequate COVID-19 protective measures at work. As the pandemic progressed, improvements in protection were patchy. A notable lack of protection arose from the underestimation of the contribution of aerosol exposure to infection risks, particularly among HCWs providing routine care of potentially infectious patients. A disciplined strategy of source control, pathway control (such as ventilation), and receptor control notably Respiratory Protective Equipment is needed, as well as worldwide vaccination, to contend with this pandemic. Control measures appropriate to the risk of infections transmitted through the air will remain necessary in the longer term, as well as adaptations in the workplace to take account of long-term COVID-19 morbidity and new work practices.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Occupational Exposure , Humans , United States , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control
4.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 66(2): 269-275, 2022 02 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34278429

ABSTRACT

The British Occupational Hygiene Society (BOHS) COVID-19 Working Group developed a control banding matrix to provide guidance for employers and others to help assess the risks of COVID-19 infection during the pandemic. The matrix was based on occupational hygiene principles and the judgement of the occupational health practitioners involved; since objective data on workers' exposure were unavailable. Users of the matrix identify one of five exposure categories based on generic job descriptions and example occupations, and these categories are linked to generic guidance on interventions at source, on the exposure pathway and for individual workers. The risk matrix was published on the BOHS website and the guidance has been downloaded more than 2000 times. The matrix has had limited evaluation for reliability, but the data suggest that the highest exposure ranked jobs were associated with higher age-standardized mortality in Britain during the pandemic. However, there was considerable variability in exposure assignments between assessors, which underlines the need for the control guidance to be precautionary. The BOHS calls on academic researchers to undertake further work to validate the reliability of the tool.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Hygiene , Reproducibility of Results , SARS-CoV-2
11.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 79(3): 1063-1074, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33427734

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Air pollution has been consistently linked with dementia and cognitive decline. However, it is unclear whether risk is accumulated through long-term exposure or whether there are sensitive/critical periods. A key barrier to clarifying this relationship is the dearth of historical air pollution data. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of modelling historical air pollution data and using them in epidemiologicalmodels. METHODS: Using the EMEP4UK atmospheric chemistry transport model, we modelled historical fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations for the years 1935, 1950, 1970, 1980, and 1990 and combined these with contemporary modelled data from 2001 to estimate life course exposure in 572 participants in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 with lifetime residential history recorded. Linear regression and latent growth models were constructed using cognitive ability (IQ) measured by the Moray House Test at the ages of 11, 70, 76, and 79 years to explore the effects of historical air pollution exposure. Covariates included sex, IQ at age 11 years, social class, and smoking. RESULTS: Higher air pollution modelled for 1935 (when participants would have been in utero) was associated with worse change in IQ from age 11-70 years (ß = -0.006, SE = 0.002, p = 0.03) but not cognitive trajectories from age 70-79 years (p > 0.05). There was no support for other critical/sensitive periods of exposure or an accumulation of risk (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The life course paradigm is essential in understanding cognitive decline and this is the first study to examine life course air pollution exposure in relation to cognitive health.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution/adverse effects , Cognitive Dysfunction/chemically induced , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Air Pollution/history , Air Pollution/statistics & numerical data , Child , Cognitive Dysfunction/epidemiology , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Female , History, 20th Century , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Particulate Matter/adverse effects , Particulate Matter/history , Scotland/epidemiology , Young Adult
16.
BMJ ; 369: m1622, 2020 04 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32341008
17.
Occup Environ Med ; 77(5): 316-323, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31974293

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine associations between occupational exposures to rubber dust, rubber fumes and N-nitrosamines and non-cancer mortality. METHODS: A cohort of 36 441 males aged 35+ years employed in British rubber factories was followed-up to 2015 (94% deceased). Competing risk survival analysis was used to assess risks of dying from non-cancer diseases (respiratory, urinary, cerebrovascular, circulatory and digestive diseases). Occupational exposures to rubber dust, rubber fumes, N-nitrosamines were derived based on a population-specific quantitative job-exposure matrix which in-turn was based on measurements in the EU-EXASRUB database. RESULTS: Exposure-response associations of increased risk with increasing exposure were found for N-nitrosomorpholine with mortality from circulatory diseases (subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) 1.17; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.23), ischaemic heart disease (IHD) (SHR 1.19; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.26), cerebrovascular disease (SHR 1.19; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.32) and exposures to N-nitrosodimethylamine with respiratory disease mortality (SHR 1.41; 95% CI 1.30 to 1.53). Increased risks for mortality from circulatory disease, IHD and digestive diseases were found with higher levels of exposures to rubber dust, rubber fumes and N-nitrosamines sum, without an exposure-dependent manner. No associations were observed between rubber dust, rubber fumes and N-nitrosamines exposures with mortality from asthma, urinary disease, bronchitis, emphysema, liver disease and some digestive diseases. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of rubber factory workers with 49 years of follow-up, increased risk for mortality from circulatory, cerebrovascular, respiratory and digestive diseases were found to be associated with cumulative occupational exposures to specific agents.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Nitrosamines/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Diseases/mortality , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Respiratory Tract Diseases/chemically induced , Respiratory Tract Diseases/mortality , Rubber/adverse effects , Adult , Chronic Disease/mortality , Dust/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms , Nitrosamines/analysis , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Risk Factors , Rubber/analysis , Survival Analysis , United Kingdom/epidemiology
19.
Occup Environ Med ; 76(8): 530-536, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31167951

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Exposure to cleaning products has been associated with adverse respiratory outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the medically reported incidence, trends in incidence and occupational determinants of work-related respiratory disorders attributed to cleaning agents and to explore the role of 'Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships' (QSAR) in corroborating the identification of chemical respiratory sensitisers. METHODS: Respiratory diagnoses attributed to cleaning agents were extracted from The Health and Occupation Research (THOR) surveillance network, 1989-2017. Incidence, trends in incidence and incidence rate ratios by occupation were investigated. Agents were classified by chemical type and QSAR hazard indices were determined for specific organic chemicals. RESULTS: Approximately 6% (779 cases) of the (non-asbestos) THOR respiratory cases were attributed to cleaning agents. Diagnoses were predominantly asthma (58%) and inhalation accidents (27%) with frequently reported chemical categories being aldehydes (30%) and chlorine/its releasers (26%). No significant trend in asthma incidence (1999-2017) was observed (annual average change of -1.1% (95% CI -4.4 to 2.4)). This contrasted with a statistically significant annual decline in asthma incidence (-6.8% (95% CI -8.0 to -5.6)) for non-cleaning agents. There was a large variation in risk between occupations. 7 of the 15 organic chemicals specifically identified had a QSAR generated hazard index consistent with being a respiratory sensitiser. CONCLUSION: Specific occupations appear to be at increased risk of adverse respiratory outcomes attributed to cleaning agents. While exposure to agents such as glutaraldehyde have been addressed, other exposures, such as to chlorine, remain important. Chemical features of the cleaning agents helped distinguish between sensitising and irritant agents.


Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aldehydes/adverse effects , Asthma/chemically induced , Asthma/epidemiology , Chlorine/adverse effects , Disinfectants/adverse effects , Female , Household Products/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship , Respiratory Tract Diseases/chemically induced , United Kingdom/epidemiology
20.
Occup Environ Med ; 76(4): 259-267, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30772817

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To develop a quantitative historical job-exposure matrix (JEM) for rubber dust, rubber fumes and n-Nitrosamines in the British rubber industry for 1915-2002 to estimate lifetime cumulative exposure (LCE) for a cohort of workers with 49 years follow-up. METHODS: Data from the EU-EXASRUB database-rubber dust (n=4157), rubber fumes (n=3803) and n-Nitrosamines (n=10 115) collected between 1977 and 2002-were modelled using linear mixed-effects models. Sample year, stationary/personal measurement, industry sector and measurement source were included as fixed explanatory variables and factory as random intercept. Model estimates and extrapolations were used to construct a JEM covering all departments in both sectors of the rubber manufacturing industries for the years 1915-2002. JEM-estimates were linked to all cohort members to calculate LCE. Sensitivity analyses related to assumptions about extrapolation of time trends were also conducted. RESULTS: Changes in rubber dust exposures ranged from -6.3 %/year (crude materials/mixing) to -1.0 %/year (curing) and -6.5 %/year (crude materials/mixing) to +0.5 %/year (finishing, assembly and miscellaneous) for rubber fumes. Declines in n-Nitrosamines ranged from -17.9 %/year (curing) to -1.3 %/year (crude materials and mixing). Mean LCEs were 61 mg/m3-years (rubber dust), 15.6 mg/ m3-years (rubber fumes), 2483.2 µg/m3-years (n-Nitrosamines sum score), 18.6 µg/m3-years (N-nitrosodimethylamine) and 15.0 µg/m3-years (N-itrosomorpholine). CONCLUSIONS: All exposures declined over time. Greatest declines in rubber dust and fumes were found in crude materials and mixing and for n-Nitrosamines in curing/vulcanising and preprocessing. This JEM and estimated LCEs will allow for evaluation of exposure-specific excess cancer risks in the British rubber industry.


Subject(s)
Nitrosamines/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Rubber/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Dust/analysis , Female , Gases/analysis , Humans , Industry/methods , Industry/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Nitrosamines/metabolism , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Rubber/metabolism , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...