Aerobic reserve and physical functional performance in older adults.

BACKGROUND: older adults can be limited in their performance of daily tasks due to an inadequate aerobic capacity. Aerobic capacity below minimum physiological thresholds required to maintain independence leaves older adults with little, or no, aerobic reserve. OBJECTIVE: the aim of this study was to measure functional performance and aerobic reserve in older adults during the serial performance of daily tasks. SUBJECTS: twenty-nine (n = 29) men and women (n = 23 females) 70-92 years of age participated in this study. METHODS: performance based physical function was assessed using the Continuous-Scale Physical Functional Performance test (CS-PFP). A Cosmed K4b(2) portable metabolic system was used to measure VO(2PEAK) and oxygen uptake during the serial performance of a battery of daily tasks (VO(2PFP)). Aerobic reserve was calculated as the difference between VO(2PEAK) and VO(2PFP). RESULTS: the correlation coefficient between aerobic reserve and functional performance was r = 0.50(P = 0.006). Participants utilized 32.2 +/- 8.1%, 42.7 +/- 10.8%, and 50.3 +/- 12.3% of VO(2PEAK) for the low, moderate, and high workloads of the CS-PFP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: light housework and carrying groceries require 40 to 50% of peak oxygen consumption. This information can be used by clinicians and health professionals working with older adults as a guide to how much aerobic fitness is needed to perform ADLs and maintain independence. These can then be used as guides for assessment and for setting training goals in older adults.

Effect of strength and power training on physical function in community-dwelling older adults.

BACKGROUND: The performance of daily tasks, such as stair climbing or lifting an object, requires both muscle strength and power. Age-associated reductions in strength and power can affect an older adult's ability to complete daily tasks such as stair climbing and lifting a child. METHODS: The purposes of this study were to determine whether power training was more efficacious than strength training for improving whole-body physical function in older adults and to examine the relationship between changes in anaerobic power and muscle strength and changes in physical function. Thirty-nine men and women (mean age +/- SD = 72.5 +/- 6.3 years) with below-average leg extensor power were randomly assigned to control (C, n = 15), strength-training (ST, n = 13) or power-training (PT, n = 11) groups. The ST and PT groups met 3 days per week for 16 weeks; the C group maintained usual activity and attended three lectures during the course of the study. Primary outcome measures included the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance test, maximal strength, and anaerobic power. RESULTS: After baseline was controlled for, the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance test total score was significantly greater for the PT group than for the ST (p =.033) and C (p =.016) groups. Maximal strength was significantly greater for the ST group than for the C group (p =.015) after the intervention. There was no significant difference between groups for peak anaerobic power. CONCLUSIONS: Power training was more effective than strength training for improving physical function in community-dwelling older adults.