Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Infect Dis Res ; 4(1)2023 Feb 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37986732

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic that has become a major source of morbidity and mortality worldwide, affecting the physical and mental health of individuals influencing reproduction. Despite the threat, it poses to maternal health in sub-Saharan Africa and Nigeria, there is little or no data on the impact it has on fertility, conception, gestation and birth. To compare the birth rate between pre-COVID and COVID times using selected months of the year. Materials and methods: This was a secondary analysis of cross-sectional analytical study data from the birth registries of three tertiary hospitals, comparing two years [2019 (Pre-COVID)] versus [2020 (COVID era)] using three months of the year (October to December). The data relied upon was obtained from birth registries in three busy maternity clinics all within tertiary hospitals in South-East Nigeria and we aimed at discussing the potential impacts of COVID-19 on fertility in Nigeria. The secondary outcome measures were; mode of delivery, booking status of the participants, maternal age and occupation. Results: There was a significant decrease in tertiary-hospital based birth rate by 92 births (P = 0.0009; 95% CI: -16.0519 to -4.1481) among mothers in all the three hospitals in 2020 during the COVID period (post lockdown months) of October to December. There was a significant difference in the mode of delivery for mothers (P = 0.0096) with a 95% confidence interval of 1.0664 to 1.5916, as more gave birth through vaginal delivery during the 2020 COVID-19 period than pre-COVID-19. Conclusion: Tertiary-hospital based birth rates were reduced during the pandemic. Our multi-centre study extrapolated on possible factors that may have played a role in this decline in their birth rate, which includes but is not limited to; decreased access to hospital care due to the total lockdowns/curfews and worsening inflation and economic recession in the country.

2.
SAGE Open Med ; 10: 20503121221085453, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35342633

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The objective of the study was to assess how the current COVID-19 pandemic has affected cesarean section (C-section) rates, indications, and peripartum outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study that compared a 3-month rates of and indications for C-sections at three tertiary health care institutions in Nigeria before (October 2019-December 2019) and during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020-May 2020). Primary outcomes were C-section rate and indications between the two periods. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 IBM Corporation. Rates and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used to quantify indications and peripartum outcomes and statistical significance was accepted when p value was <0.05. Results: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. The C-section rate during the COVID-19 period was significantly less than the period prior to the pandemic (237/580, 40.0% vs 390/833, 46.8%; p = 0.027). The rates of postdatism (odds ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-2.05, p = 0.022), fetal distress (odds ratio = 3.06, 95% confidence interval = 1.55-6.06, p = 0.017), emergency C-section (odds ratio = 1.43, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-2.05, p = 0.042), and anemia (odds ratio = 1.84, 95% confidence interval = 1.12-3.03, p = 0.016) were significantly higher during the pandemic than prepandemic. Conclusion: The overall C-section rate during the first wave of COVID-19 was significantly lower than the prepandemic period. There were higher rates of postdatism, fetal distress, emergency C-section, and postpartum anemia. Further studies on this changing C-section trend during the pandemic are needed.

3.
Article in English | AIM (Africa) | ID: biblio-1263390

ABSTRACT

Menopause and the climacteric period are associated with adverse risk factors for the development of vulvovaginal atrophy-related sexual dysfunction. Sexual dysfunction is a common problem in postmenopausal women; often underdiagnosed; inadequately treated; frequently overlooked; and most often impairing the quality of life of these women. To provide clinicians with current information on vulvovaginal atrophy-related sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women. This study is a literature review on vulvovaginal atrophy-related sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women. Relevant publications were identified through a search of PubMed and Medline; selected references; journals; and textbooks on this topic; and were included in the review. The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction increases with age. It is a common multidimensional problem for postmenopausal women that alter the physiological; biochemical; psychological; and sociocultural environment of a woman. Menopause-related sexual dysfunction may not be reversible without therapy. Estrogen therapy is the most effective option and is the current standard of care for vulvovaginal atrophy-related sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women. Sexual dysfunction is a common multidimensional problem for postmenopausal women and often impairs the quality of life of these women. Estrogen preparations are the most effective treatment. Selective estrogen receptor modulators; vaginal dehydroepiandrostenedione; vaginal testosterone; and tissue-selective estrogen complexes are promising therapies; but further studies are required to confirm their role; efficacy; and safety


Subject(s)
Atrophy , Postmenopause , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological , Vulvovaginitis , Women
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...