ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Elaborar recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia disponible y el consenso de expertos, para la gestión del riesgo del tratamiento biológico y los inhibidores de las JAK en pacientes con artritis reumatoide. Métodos: Se identificaron preguntas clínicas de investigación relevantes para el objetivo del documento. Estas preguntas fueron reformuladas en formato PICO (paciente, intervención, comparación, outcome o desenlace) por un panel de expertos, seleccionados en base a su experiencia en el área. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la evidencia, graduándose de acuerdo a los criterios GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). A continuación, se formularon las recomendaciones específicas. Resultados: Se propusieron por el panel de expertos 6preguntas PICO en base a su relevancia clínica y a la existencia de información reciente referentes al riesgo de aparición de infecciones graves, el riesgo de reactivación del virus de la hepatitisB, el riesgo de reactivación del virus varicela-zoster, el riesgo de aparición de cáncer de piel (melanoma y no melanoma) o hematológico, el riesgo de aparición de enfermedad tromboembólica y el riesgo de progresión del virus del papiloma humano. Se formularon un total de 29 recomendaciones, estructuradas por pregunta, basadas en la evidencia encontrada y el consenso de los expertos. Conclusiones: Se presentan las recomendaciones SER sobre la gestión del riesgo del tratamiento con terapias biológicas e inhibidores de las JAK en la artritis reumatoide.(AU)
Objective: To present recommendations based on the available evidence and the consensus of experts, for risk management of biological treatment and JAK inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: Clinical research questions relevant to the purpose of the document were identified. These questions were reformulated in PICO format (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome) by a panel of experts, selected based on their experience in the area. A systematic review of the evidence was carried out, grading according to the GRADE criteria (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Specific recommendations were then formulated. Results: Six PICO questions were proposed by the panel of experts based on their clinical relevance and the existence of recent information regarding the risk of occurrence of serious infections, the risk of reactivation of the hepatitisB virus, the risk of reactivation of the virus varicella-zoster, the risk of appearance of skin (melanoma and non-melanoma) or hematological cancer, the risk of appearance of thromboembolic disease and the risk of progression of the human papilloma virus. A total of 29 recommendations were formulated, structured by question, based on the evidence found and the consensus of the experts. Conclusions: The SER recommendations on risk management of treatment with biologic therapies and JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis are presented.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Biological Treatment , Early Goal-Directed Therapy , Rheumatology , Rheumatic Diseases , Skin Neoplasms , Hepatitis B , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/prevention & control , Hematologic NeoplasmsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To present recommendations based on the available evidence and the consensus of experts, for risk management of biological treatment and JAK inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Clinical research questions relevant to the purpose of the document were identified. These questions were reformulated in PICO format (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome or outcome) by a panel of experts, selected based on their experience in the area. A systematic review of the evidence was carried out, grading according to the GRADE criteria (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Specific recommendations were then formulated. RESULTS: 6 PICO questions were proposed by the panel of experts based on their clinical relevance and the existence of recent information regarding the risk of occurrence of serious infections, the risk of reactivation of the hepatitis B virus, the risk of reactivation of the virus varicella-zoster, the risk of appearance of skin (melanoma and non-melanoma) or haematological cancer, the risk of appearance of thromboembolic disease and the risk of progression of the human papilloma virus. A total of 28 recommendations were formulated, structured by question, based on the evidence found and the consensus of the experts. CONCLUSIONS: The SER recommendations on risk management of treatment with biologic therapies and JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis are presented.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Janus Kinase Inhibitors , Rheumatology , Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Biological Therapy , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Risk Management , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
Objetivo: Elaborar recomendaciones para la prevención de infección en pacientes adultos con enfermedades reumáticas autoinmunes sistémicas (ERAS). Métodos: Un panel de expertos, seleccionados con base en su currículum y experiencia, identificó preguntas clínicas de investigación relevantes para el objetivo del documento. Se realizaron revisiones sistemáticas de la evidencia, que se graduó de acuerdo con los criterios del Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Tras ello, se formularon las recomendaciones. Resultados: Se seleccionaron cinco preguntas, referentes a la prevención de infección por Pneumocystis jirovecii con trimetoprim-sulfametoxazol, medidas profilácticas contra el virus de la hepatitis B, vacunación contra el virus del papiloma humano, vacunación contra el Streptococcus pneumoniae y vacunación contra el virus de la gripe. Se formularon un total de 18 recomendaciones, estructuradas por pregunta, con base en la evidencia encontrada para las diferentes ERAS y/o consenso de expertos. Conclusiones: Existe suficiente evidencia sobre la seguridad y eficacia de las vacunaciones y otras medidas profilácticas frente a los microrganismos revisados en este documento como para ser recomendadas específicamente en pacientes con ERAS.(AU)
Objectives: To develop recommendations for the prevention of infection in adult patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). Methods: Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified by a panel of experts selected based on their experience in the field. Systematic reviews of the available evidence were conducted, and evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Specific recommendations were made. Results: Five questions were selected, referring to prevention of infection by Pneumocystis jirovecii with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, primary and secondary prophylactic measures against hepatitis B virus, vaccination against human papillomavirus, vaccination against Streptococcus pneumoniae and vaccination against influenza virus, making a total of 18 recommendations, structured by question, based on the evidence found for the different SARD and/or expert consensus. Conclusions: There is enough evidence on the safety and efficacy of vaccinations and other prophylactic measures against the microorganisms reviewed in this document to specifically recommend them for patients with SARD.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Infection Control , Rheumatic Diseases/prevention & control , Autoimmune Diseases/drug therapy , Autoimmune Diseases/prevention & control , Disease Prevention , Efficacy , VaccinationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To develop recommendations for the prevention of infection in adult patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). METHODS: Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified by a panel of experts selected based on their experience in the field. Systematic reviews of the available evidence were conducted, and evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Specific recommendations were made. RESULTS: Five questions were selected, referring to prevention of infection by Pneumocystis jirovecii with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, primary and secondary prophylactic measures against hepatitis B virus, vaccination against human papillomavirus, vaccination against Streptococcus pneumoniae and vaccination against influenza virus, making a total of 18 recommendations, structured by question, based on the evidence found for the different SARD and/or expert consensus. CONCLUSIONS: There is enough evidence on the safety and efficacy of vaccinations and other prophylactic measures against the microorganisms reviewed in this document to specifically recommend them for patients with SARD.
Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , Rheumatic Diseases , Adult , Humans , Rheumatic Diseases/complications , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To develop recommendations for the prevention of infection in adult patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). METHODS: Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified by a panel of experts selected based on their experience in the field. Systematic reviews of the available evidence were conducted, and evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Specific recommendations were made. RESULTS: Five questions were selected, referring to prevention of infection by Pneumocystis jirovecii with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, primary and secondary prophylactic measures against hepatitis B virus, vaccination against human papillomavirus, vaccination against Streptococcus pneumoniae and vaccination against influenza virus, making a total of 18 recommendations, structured by question, based on the evidence found for the different SARD and/or expert consensus. CONCLUSIONS: There is enough evidence on the safety and efficacy of vaccinations and other prophylactic measures against the microorganisms reviewed in this document to specifically recommend them for patients with SARD.
ABSTRACT
En el presente manuscrito se hace un breve resumen de loque ha sido la historia de la infectología en España. Seconsideran cuatro secciones referidas, en primer lugar, alos orígenes de una especialidad fruto de la necesidad decontar con expertos que dieran solución de una formapráctica y moderna a los diferentes problemas planteadospor los pacientes con enfermedades infecciosas. Ensegundo lugar, la aparición del sida al comienzo de losaños ochenta dio lugar a un enorme florecimiento en elcampo de las enfermedades infecciosas, que trajo consigola creación de unidades específicas dedicadas no sólo alcontrol de los problemas asociados directamente con lainfección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana, sino al tratamiento de las infecciones oportunistasconcomitantes. En tercer lugar, en estos últimos años hadespuntado de forma alarmante el problema de lainfección nosocomial, problema de plena actualidad queobliga a la presencia de infectólogos expertos en estecampo. Finalmente, la emigración y los viajes hanrequerido de los especialistas en enfermedades infecciosas una formación especial en salud internacional, lo que acrecienta la importancia de la disciplina de infectología
This paper includes a brief summary of the clinical history of the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases in Spain. Firstly, the origins of a specialty arising from the need for specialists to attend to, in a practical and modern form, the different health problems of patients affected by infectious diseases, are described. Secondly, the appearance of AIDS, at the beginning of the 1980s, prompted the creation of specific units dedicated to the care of problems associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and the concomitant opportunistic infections arising from the immunodeficiency arising from the HIV infection. Thirdly, in the last decades and even today, nosocomial infections have appeared as an alarming problem, needing the presence of specialist physicians in this field. Finally, emigration and international travel require specialists in infectious diseases with specific expertise in international health, once more highlighting the importance of the specialty of Infectious Diseases (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Infectious Disease Medicine , Communicable Diseases/history , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/epidemiology , Global Health , Human Migration/trends , Tropical Medicine/trendsABSTRACT
En el presente manuscrito se hace un breve resumen de lo que ha sido la historia de la infectología en España. Se consideran cuatro secciones referidas, en primer lugar, a los orígenes de una especialidad fruto de la necesidad de contar con expertos que dieran solución de una forma práctica y moderna a los diferentes problemas planteados por los pacientes con enfermedades infecciosas. En segundo lugar, la aparición del sida al comienzo de los años ochenta dio lugar a un enorme florecimiento en el campo de las enfermedades infecciosas, que trajo consigo la creación de unidades específicas dedicadas no sólo al control de los problemas asociados directamente con la infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana, sino al tratamiento de las infecciones oportunistas con comitantes. En tercer lugar, en estos últimos años ha despuntado de forma alarmante el problema de la infección nosocomial, problema de plena actualidad que obliga a la presencia de infectólogos expertos en este campo. Finalmente, la emigración y los viajes han requerido de los especialistas en enfermedades infecciosas una formación especial en salud internacional, lo que acrecienta la importancia de la disciplina de infectología (AU)
This paper includes a brief summary of the clinical historyof the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases in Spain. Firstly, the origins of a specialty arising from the need for specialists to attend to, in a practical and modern form, the different health problems of patients affected by infectious diseases, are described. Secondly, the appearance of AIDS, at the beginning of the 1980s, prompted the creation of specific units dedicated to the care of problems associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and the concomitant opportunistic infections arising from the immunodeficiency arising from the HIV infection. Thirdly, in the last decades and even today, nosocomial infections have appeared as an alarming problem, needing the presence of specialist physicians in this field. Finally, emigration and international travel require specialists ininfectious diseases with specific expertise in international health, once more highlighting the importance of the specialty of Infectious Diseases (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Communicable Diseases/history , Education, Medical/history , HIV Infections/history , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/history , Cross Infection/history , Hospital Units/history , Human MigrationABSTRACT
Primary infection by cytomegalovirus (CMV) commonly occurs subclinically or manifested by a self-limited mononucleosis-like syndrome in immunocompetent subjects. Severe clinical pictures are uncommon. We present a case of acute myopericarditis and hepatitis in a previously healthy 32-year-old man with primary CMV infection, assessed by serology and positive pp65 antigenemia. He was successfully treated with a course of oral valganciclovir therapy, with an immediate clinical response and normalization of laboratory tests. The literature on simultaneous presentation of CMV pericarditis and hepatitis in immunocompetent hosts, as well as the role of oral valganciclovir in this clinical setting, is reviewed.
Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Ganciclovir/analogs & derivatives , Hepatitis, Viral, Human/drug therapy , Immunocompetence/drug effects , Myocarditis/drug therapy , Pericarditis/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Adult , Cytomegalovirus/isolation & purification , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Ganciclovir/administration & dosage , Hepatitis, Viral, Human/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Myocarditis/virology , Pericarditis/diagnosis , Pericarditis/virology , Treatment Outcome , ValganciclovirABSTRACT
This paper includes a brief summary of the clinical history of the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases in Spain. Firstly, the origins of a specialty arising from the need for specialists to attend to, in a practical and modern form, the different health problems of patients affected by infectious diseases, are described. Secondly, the appearance of AIDS, at the beginning of the 1980's, prompted the creation of specific units dedicated to the care of problems associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and the concomitant opportunistic infections arising from the immunodeficiency arising from the HIV infection. Thirdly, in the last decades and even today, nosocomial infections have appeared as an alarming problem, needing the presence of specialist physicians in this field. Finally, emigration and international travel require specialists in infectious diseases with specific expertise in international health, once more highlighting the importance of the specialty of Infectious Diseases.
Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases/history , Infectious Disease Medicine/history , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/history , Communicable Diseases/therapy , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , HIV Infections/history , History, 15th Century , History, 16th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , History, Medieval , Humans , Infection Control/history , Infection Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Infection Control/organization & administration , Infectious Disease Medicine/education , Infectious Disease Medicine/organization & administration , Spain , Travel , Tropical MedicineABSTRACT
The choice of antibiotic therapy in respiratory tract infections is usually empirical. However, this choice is complicated by the increasing prevalence of resistant strains among the major bacterial pathogens involved in these infections, particularly Streptococcus pneumoniae. The aim of antimicrobial therapy in respiratory tract infections should be bacterial eradication, which is necessary to maximize clinical cure and minimize the development and spread of resistance. An increase in antimicrobial resistance reduces the probability of achieving eradication and increases the probability of clinical failure. Recent reports have demonstrated the clinical relevance of respiratory bacterial resistance to macrolides and some fluoroquinolones and betalactams. Unlike macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance, penicillin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae can be overcome by increasing the dose, and hence increasing the time during which serum concentrations are above the MIC. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters can be used to establish breakpoints predictive of bacterial eradication. From the viewpoint of PK/PD, in Spain only high-doses of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (875/125 mg tid and 2000/125 mg bid) and levofloxacin, among the oral antibiotics considered, achieve optimal coverage against S. pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae.
