ABSTRACT
Background: Bruxism is defined as repetitive masticatory muscle activity characterized by clenching or grinding of the teeth and it has been related to psychological factors, such as personality traits, anxiety and stress. Objective: To investigate association between stress and bruxism among university students. Materials and methods:Lipp's Stress Symptoms Inventory for Adults (LSSI) was applied to 253 university students in Diamantina, Brazil. The y were clinically evaluated to verify dental wear. The non-instrumental evaluation of probable bruxism was determined by the patients' reports. Sociodemographic variables and self-reported stress data were collected by usi ng the questionnaire. The chi-square test was used, and significance level of 5% ( p<0.05) was adopted. Results: The prevalence of bruxism was 45.8% and stress, 37.9%. There was no significant association between the presence of stress diagnosed by ISSL and bruxism (p = 0.815). Among the students diagnosed as stressed, 31.6% were in the resistance phase. Self-reported stress was associated with the habit of tooth grinding (p < 0.001). Conclusions: No association was found between stress and bruxism. Nevertheless, the prevalence of bruxism among these students was considered high.
Fundamento: O bruxismo é definido como atividade muscular repetitiva da mastigação caracterizada pelo ranger dos dentes e tem sido relacionado a fatores psicológicos, como traços de personalidade, ansiedade e estresse. Objetivo: Verificar a associação entre estresse e bruxismo em universitários. Materiais e métodos:O Inventário de Sintomas de Stress para Adultos de Lipp (ISSL) foi aplicado a 253 estudantes universitários em Diamantina, Brasil. Eles foram avaliados clinicamente para verificar o desgaste dentário. A avaliação não instrumental de provável bruxismo foi determinada pelos relatos dos pacientes. Variáveis sociodemográficas e dados de estresse autorreferido foram coletados por meio do questionário. Foi utilizado o teste do qui-quadrado e adotado nível de significância de 5% (p <0,05). Resultados: A prevalência de bruxismo foi 45,8% e estresse, 37,9%. Não houve associação significativa entre a presença de estresse diagnosticado pelo ISSL e bruxismo (p = 0,815). Entre os alunos com diagnóstico de estresse, 31,6% encontravam-se na fase de resistência. O estresse autorreferido foi associado ao hábito de ranger os dentes (p <0,001). Conclusões: Não foi encontrada associação entre estresse e bruxismo. Apesar disso, a prevalência de bruxismo entre esses estudantes foi considerada alta.
ABSTRACT
AIM: Low-level laser therapy has still not been well established, and it is important to define a standardized protocol for the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) using low level laser. There is no consensus on controlled clinical trials concerning the best option for laser therapy with regard to wavelength. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of red and infrared laser therapy in patients with TMD, using a randomized parallel-group double-blind trial. METHODOLOGY: Each hemiface of 19 subjects was randomized to receive intervention, in a total of 116 sensitive points. Pain was measured at baseline and time intervals of 24 hours, 30 days, 90 days, and 180 days after treatment. Irradiation of 4 J/cm2 in the temporomandibular joints and 8 J/cm(2) in the muscles was used in three sessions. RESULTS: Both treatments had statistically significant results (P<0.001); there was statistical difference between them at 180 days in favor of the infrared laser (P=0.039). There was improvement in 24 hours, which extended up to 180 days in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both lasers are effective in the treatment and remission of TMD symptoms.
