El epitelio seminal en biopsia prostática puede semejar lesiones prostáticas malignas y premalignas / Seminal epithelium in prostate biopsy can mimic malignant and premalignant prostatic lesions

Objetivos: En la mayoría de las biopsias prostáticas el epitelio seminal se reconoce fácilmente, ya que muestra criterios histológicos característicos. Sin embargo, algunas biopsias pueden semejar lesiones prostáticas malignas o premalignas. Los propósitos de este estudio son analizar el aspecto histológico de las biopsias que simularon adenocarcinomas o lesiones prostáticas preneoplásicas; comentar su diagnóstico diferencial y conocer la frecuencia de epitelio seminal en biopsias prostáticas. Métodos: Revisamos 500 biopsias prostáticas consecutivas por punción obtenidas por el método de sextantes, y seleccionamos aquellos casos en los que observamos epitelio seminal de vesículas seminales o conductos eyaculatorios. En las biopsias en las que el epitelio seminal semejó lesiones malignas o premalignas se emplearon estudios inmunohistoquímicos que incluyeron antígeno prostático específico y MUC6. Se anotaron los datos clínicos de mayor importancia. Resultados: Treinta y seis (7,2%) biopsias mostraron epitelio seminal y 7 de ellas (1,4%) semejaron diversas lesiones prostáticas, incluyendo neoplasia intraepitelial prostática de alto grado, proliferaciones acinares atípicas, adenocarcinomas con patrón papilar y carcinoma poco diferenciado. El epitelio seminal semejó lesiones prostáticas cuando el depósito de lipofuscina, las vacuolas perinucleares o las pseudoinclusiones nucleares fueron poco aparentes o estuvieron ausentes. Cinco de las 7 biopsias mostraron atipia celular leve o moderada con núcleos pequeños e hipercromáticos y solos 2 pleomorfismo celular. Los pacientes se encontraban vivos y asintomáticos después de 6 años de evolución en promedio. Conclusiones: El epitelio seminal semeja neoplasia intraepitelial prostática, proliferaciones acinares atípicas y diversos tipos de adenocarcinomas prostáticos en aproximadamente el 1,4% de las biopsias prostáticas

Objectives: In most prostate biopsies, the seminal epithelium is easily recognised because it meets characteristic histological criteria. However, some biopsies can mimic malignant or premalignant prostatic lesions. The aims of this study were to analyse the histological appearance of the biopsies that mimic adenocarcinomas or preneoplastic prostatic lesions, discuss the differential diagnosis and determine the frequency of seminal epithelia in prostate biopsies. Methods: We consecutively reviewed 500 prostate puncture biopsies obtained using the sextant method and selected those cases in which we observed seminal vesicle or ejaculatory duct epithelium. In the biopsies in which the seminal epithelium resembled malignant or premalignant lesions, immunohistochemical studies were conducted that included prostate-specific antigen and MUC6. The most important clinical data were recorded. Results: Thirty-six (7.2%) biopsies showed seminal epithelium, and 7 of them (1.4%) resembled various prostate lesions, including high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, atypical acinar proliferations, adenocarcinomas with papillary patterns and poorly differentiated carcinoma. The seminal epithelium resembled prostate lesions when the lipofuscin deposit, the perinuclear vacuoles or the nuclear pseudoinclusions were inconspicuous or missing. Five of the 7 biopsies showed mild to moderate cellular atypia with small and hyperchromatic nuclei, and only 2 showed cellular pleomorphism. The patients were alive and asymptomatic after an average of 6 years of progression. Conclusions: The seminal epithelium resembles prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, atypical acinar proliferations and various types of prostatic adenocarcinomas in approximately 1.4% of prostate biopsies

Seminal epithelium in prostate biopsy can mimic malignant and premalignant prostatic lesions.

OBJECTIVES: In most prostate biopsies, the seminal epithelium is easily recognised because it meets characteristic histological criteria. However, some biopsies can mimic malignant or premalignant prostatic lesions. The aims of this study were to analyse the histological appearance of the biopsies that mimic adenocarcinomas or preneoplastic prostatic lesions, discuss the differential diagnosis and determine the frequency of seminal epithelia in prostate biopsies. METHODS: We consecutively reviewed 500 prostate puncture biopsies obtained using the sextant method and selected those cases in which we observed seminal vesicle or ejaculatory duct epithelium. In the biopsies in which the seminal epithelium resembled malignant or premalignant lesions, immunohistochemical studies were conducted that included prostate-specific antigen and MUC6. The most important clinical data were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-six (7.2%) biopsies showed seminal epithelium, and 7 of them (1.4%) resembled various prostate lesions, including high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, atypical acinar proliferations, adenocarcinomas with papillary patterns and poorly differentiated carcinoma. The seminal epithelium resembled prostate lesions when the lipofuscin deposit, the perinuclear vacuoles or the nuclear pseudoinclusions were inconspicuous or missing. Five of the 7 biopsies showed mild to moderate cellular atypia with small and hyperchromatic nuclei, and only 2 showed cellular pleomorphism. The patients were alive and asymptomatic after an average of 6 years of progression. CONCLUSIONS: The seminal epithelium resembles prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, atypical acinar proliferations and various types of prostatic adenocarcinomas in approximately 1.4% of prostate biopsies.

[Intracranial and intramedullary peripheral nerve sheath tumours. Case reports from 20 autopsies]. / Tumores de vaina de nervio periférico intracraneales e intrarraquídeos. Informe de 20 casos de autopsia.

INTRODUCTION: Tumors arising from the sheath of peripheral nerves, both intracranial and intraspinal, are uncommon and are sometimes of difficult clinical diagnosis, especially when they occur in unusual sites. Schwannomas, neurofibromas and perineuromas are depicted in this descending order of frequency. Most are sporadic and some can be part of hereditary syndromes. Histological malignancy of this neoplasm is rare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical and pathological findings of 20 autopsy cases of intracranial and intraspinal peripheral nerve tumors are analyzed. The average age at presentation was 35 years and the male/female ratio was 1:1. RESULTS: 19 were schwannomas, 13 of the 8th cranial nerve (two associated with neurofibromatosis type 2), two originated in the trigeminal and one in the 12th nerves. Three were intraspinal, one of this underwent malignant changes and was part of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1), another was an intraspinal lumbar mass with schwannomatosis and the third was a case of multiple intraspinal neurofibromas as a part of NF-1. 14 cases were surgically treated and the causes of death were ischemic lesions due to the large size of the tumors. The correct clinical diagnosis was made in 14 patients. In 11 instances there was corroboration by biopsy. Three were misdiagnosed and three were autopsy findings. CONCLUSIONS: In this series more cases were sporadic. No sex predominance was encountered. The importance of early detection on intracranial and intraspinal peripheral tumors is paramount, since the large size of these histologically benign neoplasms makes them biologically malignant.