Pediatric chest X-rays during the COVID-19 pandemic. / Radiografía de tórax pediátrica en la era COVID.

BACKGROUND: An infectious disease caused by a new type of coronavirus that can manifest as an acute respiratory infection was discovered in China in mid-December 2019 and soon spread throughout the country and to the rest of the world. Although chest X-rays are the initial imaging technique of choice for low respiratory infections with or without dyspnea, few articles have reported the radiologic findings in children with COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical, laboratory, and chest X-ray findings in pediatric patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection attended at our hospital in March 2020. To analyze the frequency of COVID-19 compared to other respiratory infections, and to describe the radiologic manifestations of COVID-19 in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included all children with clinical manifestations of respiratory infection (fever, rhinorrhea, cough, and/or dyspnea) that required chest X-rays in our hospital between March 1 and March 31. RESULTS: A total of 231 pediatric patients (90 (39%) girls and 141 (61%) boys; mean age, 4 y, range 1 month - 16 years) underwent chest X-rays for suspected respiratory infections. Most (88.4%) had mild symptoms; 29.9% had a family member positive for COVID-19 with symptoms similar to those of the patient. Nasal and/or throat swabs were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 with PCR in the 47 (20.3%) children who presented at the emergency department; 3 (6.3%) of these were positive. Microbiological analyses were done in 85 (36.8%) of all patients, finding infections due to pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2 in 30 (35.3%). One of the patients with a PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2 had urine infection due to E. coli and blood culture positive for S. viridans. Abnormalities were observed on X-rays in 73.2% of the patients. Peribronchial thickening was the most common abnormal finding, observed in 57% of patients. Parenchymal consolidations were observed in 38.5%, being bilateral in 29.2% and associated with pleural effusion in 3.3%. The interstitial lines were thickened in 7.3%, and 7.3% had ground-glass opacities. CONCLUSION: During March 2020, COVID-19 and other symptomatic respiratory infections were observed. The radiologic pattern of these infections is nonspecific, and chest X-rays alone are insufficient for the diagnosis. Children with clinical manifestations compatible with COVID-19 (with or without PCR confirmation of infection by SARS-CoV-2) had mild symptoms and most did not require admission or invasive mechanical ventilation. In a context of community transmission, the absence of a known epidemiological antecedent should not be a contraindication for PCR to detect SARS-CoV-2.

Radiografía de tórax pediátrica en la era COVID / Pediatric chest X-rays during the COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCCIÓN: A mediados de diciembre de 2019 se describió en China una enfermedad infecciosa causada por un nuevo tipo de coronavirus que provocaba infección respiratoria aguda y pronto se extendió por el país y por el resto del mundo. A pesar de que la radiografía de tórax es la prueba de elección inicial ante infecciones respiratorias bajas con o sin disnea, hay pocos artículos que describan los hallazgos radiológicos del niño con COVID-19. OBJETIVO: Describir las características clínicas, analíticas y los hallazgos en la radiografía de tórax de la población pediátrica atendida con clínica de infección respiratoria en nuestro hospital durante el mes de marzo. Analizar la frecuencia de COVID-19 frente a otras infecciones respiratorias y sus manifestaciones radiológicas. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional transversal desde el 1 de marzo al 31 de marzo del 2020 de todos los niños con clínica de infección respiratoria (fiebre, rinorrea, tos y/o disnea) que han precisado radiografía de tórax en nuestro hospital. RESULTADOS: 231 niños precisaron radiografía de tórax por clínica de infección respiratoria, 90 (38,9%) niñas y 141 (61%) niños; rango de edad 1 mes-16 años, con una mediana de 4 años. La mayoría de los niños presentaron síntomas leves (88,4%). Un 29,9% de los niños presentaba ambiente epidémico familiar positivo con clínica respiratoria similar a la que presentaba el paciente. Se realizó test PCR SARS-CoV-2 a 47 de los niños que acudieron a la urgencia (20,3%), que fue positivo en 3 (6,3% de los testados). Se realizaron determinaciones microbiológicas al 36,8% (85/231), demostraron otros agentes infecciosos diferentes al SARS-CoV-2 en el 35,3% de los pacientes (30/85). Únicamente uno de los pacientes PCR positivo para SARS-CoV-2 presentó infección de orina por Escherichia coli y hemocultivo positivo para Streptococcus viridans. El 73,2% de los pacientes presentó algún tipo de alteración en la radiografía de tórax. Los engrosamientos peribronquiales fueron el hallazgo más común en el 57%. El 38,5% presentó consolidación parenquimatosa, que en un 29,2% fue bilateral y en un 3,3% asoció derrame pleural. Se demostró aumento de la trama intersticial en el 7,3%. El 7,3% se manifestó con opacidades en vidrio deslustrado. CONCLUSIÓN: Durante el mes de marzo coexistieron infecciones respiratorias sintomáticas COVID-19 y no COVID-19. El patrón radiológico de las infecciones respiratorias, incluida la COVID-19, no es específico y la radiografía en ningún caso fue suficiente para establecer el diagnóstico. Los niños con clínica respiratoria compatible con COVID-19, con o sin PCR confirmatoria, presentaron síntomas leves y en su mayoría no requirieron ingreso ni ventilación invasiva. En un entorno de transmisión comunitaria, la ausencia de antecedente epidemiológico conocido no debería ser una contraindicación para realizar estudio de PCR para SARS-CoV-2

BACKGROUND: An infectious disease caused by a new type of coronavirus that can manifest as an acute respiratory infection was discovered in China in mid-December 2019 and soon spread throughout the country and to the rest of the world. Although chest X-rays are the initial imaging technique of choice for low respiratory infections with or without dyspnea, few articles have reported the radiologic findings in children with COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical, laboratory, and chest X-ray findings in pediatric patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection attended at our hospital in March 2020. To analyze the frequency of COVID-19 compared to other respiratory infections, and to describe the radiologic manifestations of COVID-19 in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included all children with clinical manifestations of respiratory infection (fever, rhinorrhea, cough, and/or dyspnea) that required chest X-rays in our hospital between March 1 and March 31. RESULTS: A total of 231 pediatric patients (90 (39%) girls and 141 (61%) boys; mean age, 4 y, range 1 month - 16 years) underwent chest X-rays for suspected respiratory infections. Most (88.4%) had mild symptoms; 29.9% had a family member positive for COVID-19 with symptoms similar to those of the patient. Nasal and/or throat swabs were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 with PCR in the 47 (20.3%) children who presented at the emergency department; 3 (6.3%) of these were positive. Microbiological analyses were done in 85 (36.8%) of all patients, finding infections due to pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2 in 30 (35.3%). One of the patients with a PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2 had urine infection due to E. coli and blood culture positive for S. viridans. Abnormalities were observed on X-rays in 73.2% of the patients. Peribronchial thickening was the most common abnormal finding, observed in 57% of patients. Parenchymal consolidations were observed in 38.5%, being bilateral in 29.2% and associated with pleural effusion in 3.3%. The interstitial lines were thickened in 7.3%, and 7.3% had ground-glass opacities. CONCLUSION: During March 2020, COVID-19 and other symptomatic respiratory infections were observed. The radiologic pattern of these infections is nonspecific, and chest X-rays alone are insufficient for the diagnosis. Children with clinical manifestations compatible with COVID-19 (with or without PCR confirmation of infection by SARS-CoV-2) had mild symptoms and most did not require admission or invasive mechanical ventilation. In a context of community transmission, the absence of a known epidemiological antecedent should not be a contraindication for PCR to detect SARS-CoV-2

Urgencias abdominales en pediatría / Abdominal emergencies in pediatrics

La sintomatología abdominal es uno de los motivos de consulta más frecuente en la urgencia pediátrica, siendo el dolor abdominal el síntoma más referido. Habitualmente, para el diagnóstico es suficiente con una anamnesis y exploración física precisas. Para el radiólogo es útil conocer cuáles son las patologías abdominales más frecuentes por franjas de edad, lo cual permite acotar el diagnóstico diferencial. Cuando esté indicado realizar alguna prueba de imagen, la ecografía es la técnica inicial en la mayoría de los casos; permite realizar el diagnóstico o añadir información relevante, con las ventajas conocidas de esta técnica. La radiografía simple hoy en día queda reservada cuando existe sospecha de perforación, obstrucción intestinal o ingesta de cuerpo extraño. Conviene recordar, que el dolor abdominal puede ser secundario a una neumonía basal. La TC queda reservada para indicaciones concretas y en casos individualizados. Por ejemplo, en pacientes con alta sospecha clínica de patología abdominal y con hallazgos ecográficos no concluyentes. Se revisan algunas de las patologías más frecuentes en la urgencia pediátrica, las diferentes pruebas de imagen indicadas y la semiología radiológica en las patologías abordadas (AU)

Abdominal symptoms are among the most common reasons for pediatric emergency department visits, and abdominal pain is the most frequently reported symptom. Thorough history taking and physical examination can often reach the correct diagnosis. Knowing the abdominal conditions that are most common in each age group can help radiologists narrow the differential diagnosis. When imaging tests are indicated, ultrasonography is usually the first-line technique, enabling the diagnosis or adding relevant information with the well-known advantages of this technique. Nowadays, plain-film X-ray studies are reserved for cases in which perforation, bowel obstruction, or foreign body ingestion is suspected. It is also important to remember that abdominal pain can also occur secondary to basal pneumonia. CT is reserved for specific indications and in individual cases, for example, in patients with high clinical suspicion of abdominal disease and inconclusive findings at ultrasonography. We review some of the most common conditions in pediatric emergencies, the different imaging tests indicated in each case, and the imaging signs in each condition (AU)

Abdominal emergencies in pediatrics. / Urgencias abdominales en pediatría.

Abdominal symptoms are among the most common reasons for pediatric emergency department visits, and abdominal pain is the most frequently reported symptom. Thorough history taking and physical examination can often reach the correct diagnosis. Knowing the abdominal conditions that are most common in each age group can help radiologists narrow the differential diagnosis. When imaging tests are indicated, ultrasonography is usually the first-line technique, enabling the diagnosis or adding relevant information with the well-known advantages of this technique. Nowadays, plain-film X-ray studies are reserved for cases in which perforation, bowel obstruction, or foreign body ingestion is suspected. It is also important to remember that abdominal pain can also occur secondary to basal pneumonia. CT is reserved for specific indications and in individual cases, for example, in patients with high clinical suspicion of abdominal disease and inconclusive findings at ultrasonography. We review some of the most common conditions in pediatric emergencies, the different imaging tests indicated in each case, and the imaging signs in each condition.