Resultados de una intervención para disminuir prescripciones potencialmente inapropiadas de bloqueadores beta y calcioantagonistas / Results of an intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate prescriptions of beta blockers and calcium channel blockers

Objetivo. Determinar la frecuencia de prescripción simultánea entre bloqueadores beta y calcioantagonistas cardiodepresores, notificar a los responsables de la atención sanitaria el riesgo cardiovascular al que están expuestos esos pacientes y conseguir una reducción en el número de quienes los utilizan. Métodos. Estudio cuasi-experimental, prospectivo, desarrollando una intervención en médicos prescriptores de pacientes mayores de 65 años, tratados entre el 1 de enero y el 30 de julio de 2014, afiliados al Sistema de Salud en 101 ciudades de Colombia. Se identificaron 43.180 pacientes que mensualmente recibían algún bloqueador beta y 14.560 que recibían un calcioantagonista cardiodepresor. Se realizaron intervenciones educativas y se evaluó en los siguientes 3 meses la proporción de suspensión de alguno de los fármacos. Se evaluaron las variables sociodemográficas y farmacológicas. Resultados. Se identificaron 535 pacientes que recibían concomitantemente bloqueadores beta más calcioantagonista cardiodepresor, con edad media 75,8 ± 6,7 años. Tras 66 intervenciones educativas se logró modificación de la terapia en 235 pacientes (43,9% de usuarios). En 209 casos (88,9%) se suspendió uno de los 2 medicamentos, un 11,1% cambió por otros antihipertensivos. Las variables tener más de 85 años (OR: 1,93; IC 95%:1,07-3,50) y recibir comedicación con inhibidores del sistema renina-angiotensina (OR: 2,16; IC 95%: 1,28-3,65) se asociaron con un mayor riesgo de que el responsable de la atención en salud cambiara o suspendiera alguno de los fármacos. Conclusiones. Se logró una positiva adherencia por parte de los prestadores del servicio sanitario a recomendaciones sobre utilización adecuada de bloqueadores beta y calcioantagonistas cardiodepresores. Se deben reforzar programas de intervención de prescripciones inapropiadas que disminuyan potenciales riesgos para los pacientes en tratamiento para enfermedades cardiovasculares (AU)

Objective. To determine the frequency of simultaneous prescription of β-blockers and calcium channel blockers, notify the cardiovascular risk of these patients to the health care professionals in charge of them, and achieve a reduction in the number of those who use them. Methods. Quasi-experimental, prospective study by developing an intervention on medical prescriptions of patients older than 65 years treated between January 1 and July 30, 2014, affiliated to the Health System in 101 cities in Colombia. A total of 43,180 patients received a β-blocker each month, and 14,560 receiving a calcium channel blocker were identified. Educational interventions were performed and an evaluation was made, using sociodemographic and pharmacological variables, on the number of patients that stopped taking any of the two drugs in the following three months. Results. A total of 535 patients, with a mean age 75.8 ± 6.7 years received concomitant β-blockers plus calcium channel blockers. Modification of therapy was achieved in 235 patients (43.9% of users) after 66 educational interventions. In 209 cases (88.9%) one of the two drugs was suspended, and 11.1% changed to other antihypertensive drugs. The variable of being more than 85 years old (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.07-3.50), and receiving concomitant medication with inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (OR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.28-3.65) were associated with increased risk of their doctor changing or stopping the prescription. Conclusions. An improved adherence to recommendations for appropriate use of β-blockers and calcium channel blockers by health service providers was achieved. Intervention programs that reduce potentially inappropriate prescriptions for patients treated for cardiovascular disease should be used more frequently (AU)

Estudio de prescripción-indicación en pacientes que reciben antiepilépticos en Colombia / Drug utilisation study in patients receiving antiepileptic drugs in Colombia

Introducción: Determinar las indicaciones por las cuales se prescriben y utilizan antiepilépticos en una población de pacientes afiliados al Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud (SGSSS) de Colombia. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de corte transversal. A partir de todos los individuos que utilizaron antiepilépticos entre el 18 de julio de 2013 y el 31 de agosto de 2014 en 34 ciudades colombianas durante un periodo no inferior a 12 meses, se realizó un muestreo aleatorizado estratificado por ciudades. Se analizaron variables sociodemográficas, farmacológicas y comorbilidades. Se compararon variables continuas y categóricas, y se realizaron modelos de regresión logística. Resultados: De un total de 373 sujetos, se hallaron 197 mujeres (52,1%); el promedio de edad fue de 41,9 ± 21,7 años; predominó la monoterapia en el 65,% de los pacientes. Los medicamentos más utilizados fueron ácido valproico (53,1%) y carbamazepina (33,2%). La epilepsia fue la indicación más frecuente (n = 178; 47,7%); sin embargo, en el 52,3% de pacientes se utilizaron para indicaciones diferentes, especialmente dolor neuropático (26,8%), trastornos afectivos (14,2%) y profilaxis de migraña (12,3%). Un total de 81 pacientes con epilepsia (46,6%) estaban en control sintomático, mientras otros 25 casos (14,4%) presentaban epilepsia resistente a fármacos. En el análisis multivariado la adherencia al tratamiento se asoció con menor riesgo de fracaso terapéutico en pacientes con epilepsia (OR: 0,27; IC 95%: 0,11-0,67). Conclusiones: Los fármacos antiepilépticos en Colombia se están utilizando en indicaciones diferentes para las que fueron inicialmente diseñados. La monoterapia es la estrategia terapéutica más empleada, al igual que el uso de medicamentos clásicos dentro del grupo

Introduction: This study examines the indications according to which antiepileptic drugs are prescribed and used in a population of patients enrolled in the Colombian national health system (SGSSS). Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study. From the pool of individuals in 34 Colombian cities who used antiepileptic drugs between 18 July, 2013 and 31 August, 2014 during a period of no less than 12 months, we obtained a random sample stratified by city. Socio-demographic, pharmacological and comorbidity variables were analysed. Continuous and categorical variables were compared, and logistic regression models were used. Results: Our patient total was 373 patients, with 197 women (52.1%) and a mean age of 41.9 ± 21.7 years; 65.4% of the patients were treated with monotherapy. The most frequently used drugs were valproic acid (53.1%) and carbamazepine (33.2%). Epilepsy was the most frequent indication (n = 178; 47.7%); however, 52.3% of the patients were prescribed antiepileptics for different indications, especially neuropathic pain (26.8%), affective disorders (14.2%) and migraine prophylaxis (12.3%). A total of 81 patients with epilepsy (46.6%) displayed good seizure control while another 25 (14.4%) had drug-resistant epilepsy. In the multivariate analysis, medication adherence was associated with a lower risk of treatment failure in patients with epilepsy (OR: 0.27; 95% CI, 0.11-0.67). Conclusions: In Colombia, antiepileptic drugs are being used for indications other than those originally intended. Monotherapy is the most commonly used treatment approach, together with the use of classic antiepileptic drugs

Drug utilisation study in patients receiving antiepileptic drugs in Colombia.

INTRODUCTION: This study examines the indications according to which antiepileptic drugs are prescribed and used in a population of patients enrolled in the Colombian national health system (SGSSS). METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study. From the pool of individuals in 34 Colombian cities who used antiepileptic drugs between 18 July, 2013 and 31 August, 2014 during a period of no less than 12 months, we obtained a random sample stratified by city. Socio-demographic, pharmacological and comorbidity variables were analysed. Continuous and categorical variables were compared, and logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: Our patient total was 373 patients, with 197 women (52.1%) and a mean age of 41.9 ± 21.7 years; 65.4% of the patients were treated with monotherapy. The most frequently used drugs were valproic acid (53.1%) and carbamazepine (33.2%). Epilepsy was the most frequent indication (n=178; 47.7%); however, 52.3% of the patients were prescribed antiepileptics for different indications, especially neuropathic pain (26.8%), affective disorders (14.2%) and migraine prophylaxis (12.3%). A total of 81 patients with epilepsy (46.6%) displayed good seizure control while another 25 (14.4%) had drug-resistant epilepsy. In the multivariate analysis, medication adherence was associated with a lower risk of treatment failure in patients with epilepsy (OR: 0.27; 95%CI, 0.11-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: In Colombia, antiepileptic drugs are being used for indications other than those originally intended. Monotherapy is the most commonly used treatment approach, together with the use of classic antiepileptic drugs.

[Results of an intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate prescriptions of beta blockers and calcium channel blockers]. / Resultados de una intervención para disminuir prescripciones potencialmente inapropiadas de bloqueadores beta y calcioantagonistas.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of simultaneous prescription of ß-blockers and calcium channel blockers, notify the cardiovascular risk of these patients to the health care professionals in charge of them, and achieve a reduction in the number of those who use them. METHODS: Quasi-experimental, prospective study by developing an intervention on medical prescriptions of patients older than 65 years treated between January 1 and July 30, 2014, affiliated to the Health System in 101 cities in Colombia. A total of 43,180 patients received a ß-blocker each month, and 14,560 receiving a calcium channel blocker were identified. Educational interventions were performed and an evaluation was made, using sociodemographic and pharmacological variables, on the number of patients that stopped taking any of the two drugs in the following three months. RESULTS: A total of 535 patients, with a mean age 75.8±6.7 years received concomitant ß-blockers plus calcium channel blockers. Modification of therapy was achieved in 235 patients (43.9% of users) after 66 educational interventions. In 209 cases (88.9%) one of the two drugs was suspended, and 11.1% changed to other antihypertensive drugs. The variable of being more than 85 years old (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.07-3.50), and receiving concomitant medication with inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (OR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.28-3.65) were associated with increased risk of their doctor changing or stopping the prescription. CONCLUSIONS: An improved adherence to recommendations for appropriate use of ß-blockers and calcium channel blockers by health service providers was achieved. Intervention programs that reduce potentially inappropriate prescriptions for patients treated for cardiovascular disease should be used more frequently.