Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Women Birth ; 32(3): e315-e322, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30104173

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Benefits of breastfeeding are well-established. Few studies have examined initiation and duration of breastfeeding of Aboriginal infants. METHODS: Population-based study of women giving birth to an Aboriginal infant in South Australia, July 2011-June 2013. FINDINGS: 344 women took part. Participants were representative in relation to maternal age, infant birthweight and gestation. Eighty-six percent initiated breastfeeding, declining to 54% at 12 weeks postpartum. Women living in remote areas were more likely to be breastfeeding at 12 weeks than women living in Adelaide (Odds Ratio=2.6, 95% Confidence Interval 1.5-4.7). Two-thirds of women (67%) attending standard public antenatal care in regional areas and 61% attending regional Aboriginal Family Birthing Program Services were breastfeeding at 12 weeks, compared to one third of women (36%) attending standard metropolitan public antenatal care and 49% of women attending metropolitan Aboriginal Family Birthing Program Services. Less than half of women (45%) described their postnatal care as 'very good', and 40% were not always able to access support with infant feeding when needed. The most common reasons for switching to formula before 6 weeks were: low milk supply/baby not gaining weight, mastitis/sore breasts or other feeding problems. Mothers also identified their own health as a factor. CONCLUSION: While the findings must be treated with caution due to small numbers, they suggest benefits for women attending Aboriginal Family Birthing Program services in the urban environment where rates of initiation and continued breastfeeding are lowest. Provision of culturally appropriate support to Aboriginal women during and after pregnancy is key to improving outcomes.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Mothers/statistics & numerical data , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Adult , Birth Weight , Breast Feeding/ethnology , Breast Feeding/psychology , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Maternal Age , Mothers/psychology , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , South Australia
2.
Aust N Z J Public Health ; 40(5): 418-423, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27624177

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the extent to which Aboriginal women access primary care for themselves and their infant in the year after childbirth. METHOD: Cross sectional population-based survey of women giving birth to Aboriginal babies in South Australia between July 2011 and June 2013. RESULTS: A total of 344 women took part in the study 4-9 months after giving birth. The majority had seen a primary health care practitioner since the birth: 86% had seen a Child and Family Health Service (CaFHS) nurse, 81% a general practitioner (GP), and 61% an Aboriginal health worker (AHW). Women living in remote areas were more likely to have seen primary care practitioners than women living in Adelaide (GP: OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0-5.2; CaFHS: OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.0-5.8; AHW: OR 5.2, 95% CI 2.8-9.8). Around 16% of women with gestational diabetes and 10% with hypertension had not seen a GP since the birth, and 24% of women who had a low birthweight infant had not seen a CaFHS nurse. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high prevalence of maternal and infant morbidity, a sizeable minority of women did not access primary care practitioners postpartum. Implications for public health: Stronger efforts are needed to ensure Aboriginal women and families receive appropriate postnatal follow-up.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Health Services, Indigenous/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Male , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , South Australia , Young Adult
3.
BMJ Open ; 6(2): e010286, 2016 Feb 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26908527

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Indigenous women continue to experience rates of stillbirth, preterm birth and low birth weight, two to three times higher than other women in high-income countries. The reasons for disparities are complex and multifactorial. We aimed to assess the extent to which adverse birth outcomes are associated with maternal cannabis use and exposure to stressful events and social health issues during pregnancy. DESIGN/SETTING: Cross-sectional, population-based survey of women giving birth to Aboriginal babies in South Australia, July 2011-June 2013. Data include: maternal cannabis use, exposure to stressful events/social health issues, infant birth weight and gestation. PARTICIPANTS: 344 eligible women with a mean age of 25 years (range 15-43 years), enrolled in the study. Participants were representative in relation to maternal age, infant birth weight and gestation. RESULTS: 1 in 5 women (20.5%) used cannabis during pregnancy, and 52% smoked cigarettes. Compared with mothers not using cannabis or cigarettes, mothers using cannabis had babies on average 565 g lighter (95% CI -762 to -367), and were more likely to have infants with a low birth weight (OR=6.5, 95% CI 3.0 to 14.3), and small for gestational age (OR=3.8, 95% CI 1.9 to 7.6). Controlling for education and other social characteristics, including stressful events/social health issues did not alter the conclusion that mothers using cannabis experience a higher risk of negative birth outcomes (adjusted OR for odds of low birth weight 3.9, 95% CI 1.4 to 11.2). CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide a compelling case for stronger efforts to address the clustering of risk for adverse outcomes in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, and point to the need for antenatal care to address broader social determinants of adverse perinatal outcomes. Integrated responses--collaboratively developed with Aboriginal communities and organisations--that focus on constellations of risk factors, and a holistic approach to addressing social determinants of adverse birth outcomes, are required.


Subject(s)
Infant, Low Birth Weight , Marijuana Smoking/adverse effects , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/epidemiology , Stillbirth/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cannabis/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , South Australia/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
Birth ; 43(2): 134-43, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26776365

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women are two to three times more likely to experience adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes than non-Aboriginal women in Australia. Persisting health inequalities are at least in part explained by late and/or inadequate access to antenatal care. METHODS: This study draws on data collected in a population-based study of 344 women giving birth to an Aboriginal infant between July 2011 and June 2013 in South Australia to investigate factors associated with engagement in antenatal care. RESULTS: About 79.8 percent of mothers accessed antenatal care in the first trimester of pregnancy, and 90 percent attended five or more antenatal visits. Compared with women attending mainstream regional services, women attending regional Aboriginal Family Birthing Program services were more likely to access antenatal care in the first trimester (Adj OR 2.5 [1.0-6.3]) and markedly more likely to attend a minimum of five visits (Adj OR 4.3 [1.2-15.1]). Women attending metropolitan Aboriginal Family Birthing Program services were also more likely to attend a minimum of five visits (Adj OR 12.2 [1.8-80.8]) compared with women attending mainstream regional services. Women who smoked during pregnancy were less likely to attend a visit in the first trimester and had fewer visits. CONCLUSIONS: Scaling up of Aboriginal Family Birthing Program Services in urban and regional areas of South Australia has increased access to antenatal care for Aboriginal families. The involvement of Aboriginal Maternal Infant Care workers, provision of transport for women to get to services, and outreach have been critical to the success of this program.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Cultural Competency , Female , Health Services, Indigenous , Humans , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis , Patient Satisfaction , Pregnancy , Socioeconomic Factors , South Australia , Young Adult
5.
Birth ; 42(1): 27-37, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25600655

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families experience markedly worse maternal and child health outcomes than non-Aboriginal families. The objective of this study was to investigate the experiences of women attending Aboriginal Family Birthing Program services in South Australia compared with women attending mainstream public antenatal care. METHOD: Population-based survey of mothers of Aboriginal babies giving birth in urban, regional, and remote areas of South Australia between July 2011 and June 2013. RESULTS: A total of 344 women took part in the study around 4-9 months after giving birth; 93 percent were Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islanders, and 7 percent were non-Aboriginal mothers of Aboriginal babies. Of these, 39 percent of women lived in a major city, 36 percent in inner or outer regional areas, and 25 percent in remote areas of South Australia. Compared with women attending mainstream public antenatal care, women attending metropolitan and regional Aboriginal Family Birthing Program services had a higher likelihood of reporting positive experiences of pregnancy care (adjOR 3.4 [95% CI 1.6-7.0] and adjOR 2.4 [95% CI 1.4-4.3], respectively). Women attending Aboriginal Health Services were also more likely to report positive experiences of care (adjOR 3.5 [95% CI 1.3-9.4]). CONCLUSIONS: In the urban, regional, and remote areas where the Aboriginal Family Birthing Program has been implemented, the program has expanded access to culturally responsive antenatal care for Aboriginal women and families. The positive experiences reported by many women using the program have the potential to translate into improved outcomes for Aboriginal families.


Subject(s)
Health Services, Indigenous/organization & administration , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Patient Satisfaction/ethnology , Prenatal Care/organization & administration , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Program Evaluation , Rural Health Services/organization & administration , Self Report , South Australia , Urban Health Services/organization & administration , Young Adult
6.
Int J Equity Health ; 12: 41, 2013 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23767813

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women are between two to five times more likely to die in childbirth than non-Aboriginal women, and two to three times more likely to have a low birthweight infant. Babies with a low birthweight are more likely to have chronic health problems in adult life. Currently, there is limited research evidence regarding effective interventions to inform new initiatives to strengthen antenatal care for Aboriginal families. METHOD/DESIGN: The Aboriginal Families Study is a cross sectional population-based study investigating the views and experiences of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal women having an Aboriginal baby in the state of South Australia over a 2-year period. The primary aims are to compare the experiences and views of women attending standard models of antenatal care with those accessing care via Aboriginal Family Birthing Program services which include Aboriginal Maternal Infant Care (AMIC) Workers as members of the clinical team; to assess factors associated with early and continuing engagement with antenatal care; and to use the information to inform strengthening of services for Aboriginal families. Women living in urban, regional and remote areas of South Australia have been invited to take part in the study by completing a structured interview or, if preferred, a self-administered questionnaire, when their baby is between 4-12 months old. DISCUSSION: Having a baby is an important life event in all families and in all cultures. How supported women feel during pregnancy, how women and families are welcomed by services, how safe they feel coming in to hospitals to give birth, and what happens to families during a hospital stay and in the early months after the birth of a new baby are important social determinants of maternal, newborn and child health outcomes. The Aboriginal Families Study builds on consultation with Aboriginal communities across South Australia. The project has been implemented with guidance from an Aboriginal Advisory Group keeping community and policy goals in mind right from the start. The results of the study will provide a unique resource to inform quality improvement and strengthening of services for Aboriginal families.


Subject(s)
Maternal Health Services/standards , Maternal Welfare/ethnology , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Patient Satisfaction/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Services, Indigenous/standards , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Quality of Health Care , South Australia , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...