ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is the modality of choice for children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) awaiting renal transplant; however, this option is sometimes avoided for those with previous laparotomy. The goal of this study was to compare the outcomes of PD in patients with and without previous laparotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients who had been started on peritoneal dialysis were retrospectively analysed. Group LAP consisted of six patients with previous laparotomy, and Group NO-LAP of 18 controls with either retroperitoneal or no abdominal surgery. The percentage of theoretical maximum volume of infusion, time to reach it, complications (infection and drainage difficulties), and number of catheters needed to finish therapy were analysed. RESULTS: The characteristics of patients and technique of insertion are presented in Table. The percentage of maximum theoretical volume of infusion was similar in both groups. Median of catheter survival was similar in both groups. Complications were divided into malfunction (slow drainage, obstruction or leak) and infection. Incidence of complications per catheter and per month of dialysis was ten times lower in Group NO-LAP. Peritoneal dialysis failed in one patient with recurrent intraperitoneal adhesions after adhesiolysis in Group LAP. CONCLUSION: Despite a higher incidence of complications (malfunction and infections), PD remains an acceptable option after laparotomy. In this series, it was sufficient in achieving adequate filtration in five patients.
