[Place of clinical pharmacist in the management of drugs in patients with hypertension]. / Place du pharmacien clinicien dans la prise en charge thérapeutique du patient hypertendu.

PURPOSE: To synthesize pharmacists' interventions made in the department of internal medicine and hypertension of university hospital of Toulouse and assess the impact on medication orders. METHODS: This is a single-center, prospective study using pharmacists' interventions recorded between September 2013 and March 2014 on the Act-IP(©) website of the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy. The clinical pharmacist is present everyday in the unit to establish the medication reconciliation of new patients (the process of comparing a patient's medication orders to all of the medications that the patient has been taking), and analysis of medication orders. When a risk of iatrogenic drug is identified, a therapeutic change is proposed to the prescriber. RESULTS: A total of 2491 medication orders were analyzed for 7 months, leading to 39 pharmacists' interventions (1.6 pharmacists' interventions per 100 medication orders). The most commonly identified drug-related problems were improper administration (33%, n=13), not prescribed drug (21%, n=8), non-conformity to guidelines (18%, n=7), supratherapeutic dose (15%, n=6), and 13% (n=5) targeted prescribed treatment not administered, underdosing, incorrect administration or drug interaction. The most relevant molecules were atorvastatin (10%), bromazepam (8%) and levothyroxine (8%) and only 2 interventions targeted antihypertensive drugs. The rate of physicians' acceptance was 92%. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists' interventions mainly concern the co-prescriptions of antihypertensive drugs and very few antihypertensive drugs. The clinical pharmacist contributes to preventing iatrogenic in patients with hypertension with a very good acceptance by the clinician.

Effect of postural changes on aldosterone to plasma renin ratio in patients with suspected secondary hypertension.

AIMS: To study the influence of postural changes on aldosterone to renin ratio (ARR) in patients with suspected secondary hypertension and to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the recommended seated ARR compared to supine and upright ARR for primary aldosteronism screening. METHODS: Fifty-three hypertensive patients were prospectively hospitalized for secondary hypertension exploration (age: 51 ± 12, 66% males). After withdrawal of drugs interfering with renin angiotensin system, plasma aldosterone and direct renin concentration were measured in the morning, at bed after an overnight supine position, then out of bed after 1 hour of upright position and finally 2 hours later after 15 minutes of seating. Minimal renin value was set at 5 µUI/mL. RESULTS: Referring to ARR cut-off of 23 pg/µUI, the sensitivity of seated ARR was 57.1% and specificity was 92.3%. The negative and positive predictive values were 95.1% and 45.2% respectively. Compared to these results, a cut-off of 19 improved sensitivity to 85.7% with a specificity of 89.7%. Negative and positive predictive values were 98.3% and 41.1% respectively. Seated ARR mean value was lower than supine and upright ARR mean values, due to an overall increase in renin at seating compared to the supine position by factor 1.9 while aldosterone just slightly increased by factor 1.2. Seated ARR correlated to supine and upright ARR: correlation coefficients (r) 0.90 and 0.93 respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Current recommended measurement of ARR in the seating position is fairly correlated to supine and upright ARR. A suggested cut-off value of 19 instead of 23 pg/µUI increased the discriminating power of this test.