[POSITION STATEMENT FOR INTERMITTENT CATHETERIZATION OF URINARY BLADDER].

INTRODUCTION: A position paper presents the standpoint of the Israeli Urological Association on clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) for all physicians and nurses. The position paper is based on international guidelines and professional literature and is adapted to medical activities in Israel. CIC is indicated for the treatment of temporary/permanent disability in the emptying of the bladder, which is expressed by large post-voided urine/urine retention and related complications. There are a few contra-indications for CIC (low bladder volume or compliance, pressure sores/external infection of the urethra, anatomical, functional or cognitive disorder that does not allow to perform CIC, recurrent macrohematuria or urethrorrhagia, urethral pain that does not allow frequent catheterization, patient unwillingness to perform CIC by himself or by another person). There are alternatives to performing CIC permanent urethral or suprapubic catheter, urinary tract diversion, sphincterotomy. Before starting to perform CIC, the patient should be verified as being able to perform CIC and adhere to a predetermined schedule. It is recommended to perform the CIC at regular intervals during the day. During training and early stages of the CIC, it is recommended to catheter every 4-6 hours to assess bladder volume at these time intervals (urinary volume per catheterization). It is recommended to record drinking volumes, voiding volumes, and catheterization volumes for adjusting and timing the CIC. In order to determine the right number of catheterizations, several factors should be taken into account, such as the patient's ability to void, bladder capacity, and various urodynamic variables. In some cases additional therapy might be administered to reduce bladder pressure. If a patient cannot perform CIC on his own, a caregiver or a family member may be instructed to perform the procedure. The Committee described the methods and techniques to perform CIC and described possible complications (although rare) such as urinary tract infections (UTI), urethral and/or bladder damage, and the difference between a condition of asymptomatic bacteriuria and UTI. The Committee recommends that preventive antibiotic treatment should not be given to CIC patients. Antibiotic treatment should be given only in the case of UTI. The Committee recommends active participation of medical, nursing, social workers, family members and direct caregivers to improve the quality of life of CIC patients. Long-term follow-up is needed to diagnose and prevent complications of CIC/underlying disease leading to CIC. Different follow-up tests should be performed based on underlying disease, complications or changes in patient symptoms. The Committee described different types of catheters and recommends that the use of single-use catheters is preferable. Pre-shielding should be used before using the catheters without external coating.

Evaluating new types of tourniquets by the Israeli Naval special warfare unit.

BACKGROUND: Extremity injuries, which accounts for 20% of all battlefield injuries, result in 7-9% of deaths during military activity. Silicone tourniquets were used, by the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) soldiers, for upper extremity and calf injuries, while thigh injuries were treated by an improvised "Russian" tourniquet (IRT). This is the first study, performed in the IDF, comparing the IRT with Combat Application Tourniquets (CAT) and Special Operations Force Tactical Tourniquets (SOFTT). 23 operators from the Israeli Naval Unit (Shayetet 13) were divided into two groups according to their medical training (11 operators trained as first-responders; 12 operators as medics). Repetitive applications of the three tourniquets over the thigh and upper arm, and self-application of the CAT and SOFTT over the dominant extremity were performed using dry and wet tourniquets (828 individual placements) with efficacy recorded. Cessation of distal arterial flow (palpation; Doppler ultrasound) confirmed success, while failure was considered in the advent of arterial flow or tourniquet instability. Satisfaction questionnaires were filled by the operators. RESULTS: CAT and SOFTT were found to be superior to the IRT, in occluding arterial blood flow to the extremities (22%, 23% and 38%, respectively, failure rate). The application was quicker for the CAT and SOFTT as compared to the IRT (18, 26, 52 seconds, respectively). Wet tourniquets neither prolonged application nor did they increase failure rates. Similarly, medics didn't have any advantage over non-medic operators. No findings indicated superiority of CAT and SOFTT over one another, despite operators' preference of CAT. CONCLUSIONS: CAT and SOFTT offer an effective alternative to the IRT in stopping blood flow to extremities. No difference was observed between medics and non-medic operators. Thus, the CAT was elected as the preferred tourniquet by our unit and it is being used by all the operators.