A large-bolus injection, but not continuous infusion of sodium selenite improves outcome in peritonitis.

Administration of sodium selenite in septic shock has been associated with apparently conflicting results that may be related to different dosing schedules. Bolus administration, leading to a transient pro-oxidative effect, could limit the inflammatory reaction and improve outcomes. We studied 21 anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, invasively monitored, and fluid-resuscitated sheep. Nine hours after inducing peritonitis by injection of autologous feces, the animals were randomized into three groups: (i) bolus injection (2 mg selenium as selenite, followed by 0.06 microg . kg-1 . h-1, n = 7); (ii) continuous infusion (4 microg . kg-1 . h-1 selenium, n = 7), or (iii) control (n = 7). No vasopressors or antibiotics were administered. All animals were monitored until spontaneous death. Peak plasma selenium values reached 4 to 14 micromol . L-1. Compared with the other groups, sheep given a bolus of sodium selenite had delayed hypotension with better maintained cardiac index, delayed hyperlactatemia, fewer sepsis-induced microvascular alterations, and a prolonged survival time (21.9 [bolus group] vs. 18.4 [continuous group] and 18.3 h [control group], P < 0.05). Hence, in this model of septic shock, the administration of a large bolus of sodium selenite (rather than a continuous administration) resulted in beneficial effects, probably by a transient oxidative effect.

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) for severe sepsis: could we consider a shorter treatment period in patients with a favorable course?

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to develop a model to identify patients in whom drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DAA) might be administered for periods shorter than the recommended 96 hours. METHODS: We did a retrospective chart review of all 124 patients treated with a standard 96-hour infusion of DAA in a 31-bed department of intensive care. Using a stepwise approach, we identified and combined parameters that could help predict outcomes to achieve the best sensitivity associated with 100% specificity. RESULTS: Twenty-one (17%) of the 124 patients had a favorable outcome (left the intensive care unit within 5 days of DAA initiation); of these, 11 had an increase in arterial pH in the first 24 hours of treatment compared with 22 (21%) of the 103 patients with intermediate (intensive care unit stay >5 days after DAA initiation) or unfavorable (died within 5 days of DAA initiation) outcomes (P = not significant). Eight (72.7%) of these 11 patients and no other patient showed a decrease in sequential organ failure assessment score of at least 50% during the first 24 hours (P < .001). By combining these 2 variables, we could identify, with 100% specificity, 8 of the patients with a favorable outcome (38%) who made a prompt recovery. CONCLUSIONS: A simple model based on sequential organ failure assessment score and arterial pH can help identify patients with a rapid favorable course in whom a shorter duration of DAA treatment may be justified.