Relevance of CT for the detection of septic foci: diagnostic performance in a retrospective cohort of medical intensive care patients.

AIM: To analyse the diagnostic yield of computed tomography (CT) in septic patients from a medical intensive care unit (ICU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A full-text search of the department's radiological information system (RIS) retrieved 227 body CT examinations undertaken to search for a septic focus in 2018 from medical ICU patients. CT reports were categorised according to the identified foci. Clinical and laboratory information was gathered. Data were analysed statistically using descriptive statistics, diagnostic test quality criteria, binomial tests and chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 227 CT examinations from 165 septic patients detected 264 foci, which were distributed as follows: 58.3% (n=154/264) chest, 26.5% (n=70/264) abdomen, 5.3% (n=14/264) genitourinary system, and 9.8% (n=26/264) other body regions. In 15.9% (n=36/227) no focus was identified on CT. Based on CT reports, 37.5% (n=99/264) of foci were graded as certain, 18.9% (n=50/264) as likely, and 15.9% (n=42/264) as possible infectious sources. Septic foci were detected using CT with 75.8% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 69.6-81.9%) and 59.46% specificity (95% CI 42.9-76.1%). The positive predictive value was 90.6% (95% CI 86-95.2%), with a negative predictive value of 32.4% (95% CI 21-43.8%). CONCLUSION: The present results confirm that body CT is a suitable rule-in test for septic patients in medical intensive care, although it cannot reliably rule out a septic focus. Follow-up CT examinations may reveal a septic source in the further course of a patient's hospital stay.

An electronic tool for visual feedback to monitor the adherence to quality indicators in intensive care medicine.

Evidence-based medicine is often inadequately implemented in intensive care units (ICU); the aim of this study was to improve its implementation via a technical feedback system, using key performance indicators (KPI). The study evaluated 205 patients treated in a cardiac surgical ICU over a 6-month period (3 months before and 3 months after implementation of the feedback system). KPI adherence rates for sedation, delirium and pain monitoring, and completion of a weaning protocol before and after the implementation of the feedback system, were compared. Adherence rates for pain and delirium monitoring, and implementation of the weaning protocol, were significantly increased by the intervention. Adherence to KPIs for sedation, which were high at baseline, could not be further improved. Daily display of KPI implementation had a positive effect on adherence to standard operating procedures. Adherence to guidelines may be improved by using this feedback system as part of the clinical routine.

Key performance indicators in intensive care medicine. A retrospective matched cohort study.

Expert panel consensus was used to develop evidence-based process indicators that were independent risk factors for the main clinical outcome parameters of length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality. In a retrospective, matched data analysis of patients from five ICUs at a tertiary university hospital, agreed process indicators (sedation monitoring, pain monitoring, mean arterial pressure [MAP] >or= 60 mmHg, tidal volume [TV] or= 80 and or= 60 mmHg and BG >or= 80 mg/dl were relevant for survival. Linear regression of the 634 patients showed that analgesia monitoring, PIP or= 60 mmHg, BG >or= 80 mg/dl and