ABSTRACT
Background: ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) is a novel type of extracorporeal albumin dialysis that supports multiorgan function in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). No data exist on whether ADVOS affects inflammatory cytokine levels, which play a relevant role in ACLF. Aim: Our aim was to quantify cytokine levels both before and after a single ADVOS treatment in patients with ACLF at a regular dialysis ward. Methods and results: In this prospective study, 15 patients (60% men) with ACLF and an indication for renal replacement therapy were included. Patient liver function was severely compromised, reflected by a median CLIF-consortium ACLF score of 38 (IQR 35; 40). Blood samples were directly taken before and after ADVOS dialysis. The concentration of cytokines for IL-1ß, IFN-α2, IFN-γ, TNF-α, MCP-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17A, IL-18, IL-23, IL-33 were quantified via a cytometric bead array. We found no significant (p > 0.05) change in cytokine levels, even when patients were stratified for dialysis time (<480 min versus ≥480 min). The relevance of the assessed cytokines in contributing to systemic inflammation in ACLF was demonstrated by Ingenuity pathway analysis®. Conclusion: Concentrations of pathomechanistically relevant cytokines remained unchanged both before and after ADVOS treatment in patients with ACLF.
ABSTRACT
Esophagectomy for cancer is a highly complex and demanding two-cavity procedure associated with a considerable morbidity and mortality. There are several controversies with regard to the optimal risk and complication management. Strategies include patient selection, optimization of malnutrition, hospital and surgeon volume, intraoperative anesthesiological and surgical measures, and postoperative management of complications. In this article, we review the literature on these aspects that have an impact on outcomes after esophagectomy.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagectomy/mortality , Humans , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Risk Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Ranking systems and comparisons of quality and performance indicators will be of increasing relevance for complex "high-risk" procedures such as esophageal cancer surgery. The identification of evidence-based standards relevant for key performance indicators in esophageal surgery is essential for establishing monitoring systems and furthermore a requirement to enhance treatment quality. In the course of this review, we analyze the key performance indicators case volume, radicality of resection, and postoperative morbidity and mortality, leading to continuous quality improvement. Ranking systems established on this basis will gain increased relevance in highly complex procedures within the national and international comparison and furthermore improve the treatment of patients with esophageal carcinoma.
