Patient-rated versus clinician-rated side effects of drug treatment in schizophrenia. Clinical validation of a self-rating version of the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale (UKU-SERS-Pat).

A self-rating version of the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale has been developed. The present study examines the agreement between patients' self-assessment of side effects and the attending clinicians' ratings. The patient sample consisted of 63 patients with schizophrenia under maintenance treatment with risperidone, clozapine or classical antipsychotics. Approximately two thirds of the patients used concomitant medication with e.g. benzodiazepines, SSRIs, anticholinergics. Most inter-correlations between scores for single, corresponding items, subscores of Psychic, Neurological, Autonomic and Other side effects, as well as the Total Score from the patient version of the UKU Side Effect Self Rating Scale (UKU-SERS-Pat) and the clinician version (UKU-SERS-Clin) were found to be statistically significant. Patients reported side effects more frequently and or rated symptoms more severe than the clinicians. The results support the validity of the SERS-Pat and suggest that patient rated side effects may provide important clinical information not detected by clinician rated interviews. Such information can be utilised both in clinical investigations, in development of treatment programs and for individual patients in clinical practice.

Assessment of patient satisfaction with psychiatric care. Development and clinical evaluation of a brief consumer satisfaction rating scale (UKU-ConSat).

Quality management and quality control of health services has become increasingly important. Central to the concept of quality of care is the patient's (the health care consumer's) own view of the care provided and the treatment outcome. UKU (Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser; that is, Committee for Clinical Trials), a working group within the Scandinavian Society for Psychopharmacology (SSP), has designed a brief consumer satisfaction rating scale, the UKU-ConSat. Based on an extensive literature review, a number of principles related to content, assessment, interview techniques, documentation and standardisation steered the design of the rating scale. UKU-ConSat consists of six items related to the structure and process of treatment care, and two items related to outcome and well-being. A manual accompanies the rating scale with guidelines for how to solicit information from the patient and how to rate each item. A first field trial of the rating scale in 135 inpatients at multiple clinical sites in Finland and Sweden showed that it could be applied to several relevant patient categories (psychotic, affective, neurotic, organic and alcohol and substance abuse disorders). According to both patients and staff the rating scale promises to become useful both for research and for improvement of routine psychiatric services.

A double-blind study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine and doxepin in patients with major depression.

One hundred and sixty-three patients with major depression were randomly assigned to treatment with mirtazapine or doxepin for 6 weeks in a double-blind clinical trial. Initially, patients received mirtazapine 20 mg/day or doxepin 75 mg/day; dosages were then titrated up to a maximum of 60 mg/day and 300 mg/day, respectively. Both drugs produced considerable improvement in depressive symptoms with no statistically significant differences between the two patient groups. In the mirtazapine group only two patients prematurely terminated the study due to adverse drug experiences, as compared to six in the doxepin-treated group. Moreover, doxepin-treated patients complained more frequently of dry mouth and movement disorders. In conclusion, mirtazapine is an effective treatment for major depression and appears to offer advantages in tolerability over doxepin.

Remoxipride and haloperidol in schizophrenia: a double-blind multicentre study.

Ninety-two patients with schizophrenia were included in a double-blind multicentre parallel-group trial comparing remoxipride and haloperidol. The mean daily dose during the last week of treatment was 316 mg (range, 150-600 mg) in the remoxipride group and 8.7 mg (range, 5-20 mg) in the haloperidol group. The study period was six weeks with at least one day of washout. Both Clinical Global Impression (CGI) rating, and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total scores declined at the end of the trial compared with pretreatment values in both groups. No significant differences were found between the remoxipride and haloperidol groups with regard to the treatment outcome. Treatment-emergent extrapyramidal symptoms were statistically more frequent and more severe during haloperidol than during remoxipride treatment. Haloperidol-treated patients reported also significantly more concentration difficulties. Severe extrapyramidal side effects in the haloperidol group and clinical ineffectiveness in the remoxipride group were the most frequent reasons for premature discontinuation of treatment.

Zuclopenthixol acetate in Viscoleo--a new drug formulation. An open Nordic multicentre study of zuclopenthixol acetate in Viscoleo in patients with acute psychoses including mania and exacerbation of chronic psychoses.

Eighty-three acutely disturbed, psychotic patients were included in an open multicentre study. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical effect of zuclopenthixol acetate in Viscoleo (CPT-A). Each patient received from one to four intramuscular injections of CPT-A during the 6-day study period. The duration of action after one injection was between 2 and 3 days and doses from 50 mg to 150 mg were sufficient for most patients. Treatment with CPT-A caused a pronounced and rapid reduction of the psychotic symptoms. At the end of the 6-day test period the mean total score on BPRS in acute non-manic and exacerbated chronic patients was reduced by more than 50 per cent. In acute manic patients the mean total score on BRMS was reduced by 57 per cent already 1 day after injection. Rapidly after the injection of CPT-A a useful short-acting sedation can be expected, but the risk for oversedation even after a second injection is low. The frequency of unwanted effects, including extrapyramidal reactions, was low and the severity of symptoms was most often mild. With a rapid onset of action, a duration of effect of 2 to 3 days, and few and mild side effects, CPT-A offers advantages over the neuroleptic preparations conventionally used in the initial treatment of acutely disturbed, psychotic patients.

Flupenthixol decanoate in recurrent manic-depressive illness. A comparison with lithium.

The hypothesis that flupenthixol decanoate may serve as an alternative to prophylactically administered lithium in recurrent manic-depressive illness, bipolar and unipolar type, was tested in two groups of patients. In Group I the patients were allocated randomly to maintenance treatment with either lithium or flupenthixol decanoate. The patients in Group II had previously been given lithium and were switched to flupenthixol decanoate because of unsatisfactory prophylactic effect of lithium, doubtful tablet compliance, troublesome side effects, or fear of later harmful effects. The flupenthixol decanoate dosage was 20 mg every 2-3 weeks. The study was not blind. In Group I neither lithium treatment (14 patients) nor treatment with flupenthixol decanoate (19 patients) led to a significant fall of mean episode frequency or mean per cent time ill. The reasons for this lack of response are not clear, but prognostically negative selection of the patients presumably took place before and possibly also during the hospitalization. Since absent effects cannot be compared, this part of the trial remains inconclusive. In Group II (93 patients) treatment with flupenthixol decanoate was associated with significant falls of the frequency of manic episodes and per cent time ill in mania and with significant rises of the frequency of depressive episodes and per cent time ill in depression. Increase of depressive morbidity was seen only in patients who had been given lithium during the pre-trial period and was presumably a result of the discontinuation of lithium. It is not known whether flupenthixol decanoate is of value in the prophylactic treatment of recurrent manic-depressive illness, but the drug may be worth trying in patients whose disease is dominated more by manic than by depressive recurrences and who do not respond to lithium or do not tolerate it or do not take it.

Effect of anticonvulsant and antidepressant drugs on iodothyronines in serum.

Serum iodothyronine concentrations were measured in patients on long-term therapy with one or two anticonvulsant drugs. Diphenylhydantoin (DPH) and carbamazepine (CBZ) reduced the serum levels of thyroxine (T4) free T4 index, reverse triiodothyronine (rT3) and 3,3'-diiodothyronine (3,3'-T2), whereas the depressant effect on the serum levels of triiodothyronine (T3) and free T3 index was small but statistically significant. In patients administered DPH and phenobarbital (PB) or CBZ and primidone (PD) the serum iodothyronine levels were also depressed, except for normal T3 and free T3 index. Patients receiving only PB or PD had normal serum levels of total and free thyroid hormones, but decreased concentrations of rT3 and 3,3'-T2. Only supratherapeutic concentrations of DPH and CBZ added in vitro to control sera significantly reduced the number of T4 and T3-binding sites, as reflected in increased T4 and T3 uptake test results. This indicates that the DPH and CBZ-induced decrease in thyroid hormone concentrations in vivo is not due to a displacement of thyroid hormones from their binding sites on serum proteins. The antidepressant drugs amitriptyline and mianserin had no effect on the thyroid hormone levels in serum.

Clopenthixol decanoate and perphenazine enanthate in schizophrenic patients. A double-blind Nordic multicentre trial.

The clinical properties of clopenthixol decanoate has been investigated versus perphenazine enanthate in a double-blind clinical multicentre trial including 14 psychiatric hospitals in Finland, Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. Test treatment was initiated in 172 chronic schizophrenic patients and the planned 6 months test period was completed by 57 patients receiving clopenthixol decanoate and 48 receiving perphenazine enanthate. The therapeutic effect was assessed by means of CGI, BPRS, and NOSIE-30 and was found significant with both test drugs. Significant differences in the effect were seen only in "Hostile-suspiciousness" (BPRS) and "Social interest" (NOSIE-30). For these items clopenthixol decanoate was found superior to perphenazine enanthate. The influence of side effects on the patients' functioning was found to be slightly, but not significantly more troublesome in the perphenazine enanthate patients.

Decreased uptake of 5-hydroxytryptamine in blood platelets from patients with endogenous depression.

5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) uptake was studied by using blood platelets from 13 patients with endogenous depression (Hamilton rating scale 33 +/- 7) and 13 healthy volunteers. An improved method with a short incubation time and low substrate concentration was used, and the incubation was performed in Krebs-Henseleit buffer (pH 7.4) at 37 degrees C. A clear difference in 5-HT uptake by blood platelets was noted: The Vmax of the reaction in patients was 39, and in controls 71 pmol per 2 x 10(7) platelets in 5 min. There was no significant difference in the Km. After a 4-week treatment with imipramine, a competitive inhibition of 5-HT uptake with an increased Km was seen; after a similar treatment with amoxapine there was little change in 5-HT uptake. Amoxapine was inferior to imipramine as an inhibitor of 5-HT uptake, also in vitro. There was no difference in clinical recovery in these treatment groups. These results may be of importance so as to understand the potential biological differences between depressed patients and normal persons.

Symptom reduction in depression after treatment with L-tryptophan or imipramine. Item analysis of Hamilton rating scale for depression.

Thirty-eight in-patients with endogenous- and 20 in-patients with non-endogenous depression, took part in a multi-centre 3-week double-blind trial where patients were randomly allocated to treatment with either 6 g L-tryptophan or 150 mg imipramine daily. Item analysis of Hamilton ratings, before the investigation and weekly during the trial period demonstrated few statistically different mean scores on individual items between the two treatment groups. After 3 weeks' treatment a statistically significant item mean reduction on the 0.1% level was found in the item Agitation in favour of imipramine-treated, and in the item Work and Activities in favour of L-tryptophan-treated endogenously depressed patients. After 3 weeks' treatment a statistically significant item mean reduction on the 5% level was found in the item Suicide in favour of imipramine-treated non-endogenously depressed patients. The present study has shown that, after 3 weeks' treatment, imipramine and L-tryptophan has decreased the mean score on individual items of HRS in about the same degree.