ABSTRACT
The chicken avidin gene (AVD) forms a closely clustered gene family together with several avidin-related genes (AVRs). In this study, we used fluorescence in situ hybridization on extended DNA fibers (fiber-FISH) to show that the number of the AVD and AVR genes differs between individuals. Furthermore, the gene copy-number showed wide somatic variation in white blood cells of the individuals. The molecular mechanism underlying the fluctuation is most probably unequal crossing-over and/or unequal sister chromatid exchange, as judged by the Gaussian distribution of the gene counts. By definition, an increase in gene number on one locus should be accompanied by a decrease on the other locus in unequal sequence exchange. The results suggest that copy-number lability may be more common among gene families than previously thought. The chicken avidin gene family also provides an excellent model for studying the mechanisms of recombination and gene conversion.
Subject(s)
Avidin/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Gene Dosage , Animals , Chickens , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Multigene FamilyABSTRACT
If hot spots for different taxa coincide, priority-setting surveys in a region could be carried out more cheaply by focusing on indicator taxa. Several previous studies show that hot spots of different taxa rarely coincide. However, in tropical areas indicator taxa may be used in selecting complementary networks to represent biodiversity as a whole. We studied beetles (Coleoptera), Heteroptera, polypores or bracket fungi (Polyporaceae) and vascular plants of old growth boreal taiga forests. Optimal networks for Heteroptera maximized the high overall species richness of beetles and vascular plants, but these networks were least favourable options for polypores. Polypores are an important group indicating the conservation value of old growth taiga forests. Random selection provided a better option. Thus, certain groups may function as good indicators for maximizing the overall species richness of some taxonomic groups, but all taxa should be examined separately.
