Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22277757

ABSTRACT

BackgroundVaccination has been effective in preventing COVID-19 infections and related mortality. However, waning immunity after the two-dose vaccination prompted health authorities to recommend a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine to boost immunity. The aim of our study was to assess willingness to receive a third (booster) dose among patients with IBD. MethodsA cross-sectional study was performed at a tertiary care inflammatory bowel disease center. Patients were recruited at the infusion room from January 1st, 2022, until March 31st, 2022. The primary outcome was the prevalence of BNT162b2 third (booster) dose in infliximab- or vedolizumab-treated patients with IBD. The secondary outcome evaluated whether the prevalence of BNT162b2 third (booster) dose differed based on type of COVID-19 vaccine, gender, age, type of biologic therapy and citizenship. ResultsIn total, 499 patients with IBD were included in this study. The median age was 34.5 years, and 60% had ulcerative colitis (UC). Among the study participants, 302 (60.5%) patients were vaccinated with BNT162b2, and 197 (39.5%) were vaccinated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Of the total number of participants, 400 (80.2%) were receiving infliximab, and 99 (19.8%) were receiving vedolizumab. Overall, 290 (58.1%) of the included patients were willing to receive the third (booster) dose. Patients vaccinated with BNT162b2 were more likely to receive booster dose compared to patients vaccinated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [201 (66.5%) vs 101 (33.5%), p = 0.014]. Infliximab-treated patients were more likely to receive booster dose compared to patients receiving vedolizumab [310 (77.5%) vs 62 (62.6%), p = 0.002]. There was no statistical difference in willingness to receive booster dose in terms of age, nationality, or gender. ConclusionThe percentage of patients with IBD willing or have received a third (booster) dose of BNT162b2 vaccine was lower compared to general population. In addition, patients who received two doses of BNT162b2 vaccines were more likely to receive a third (booster) dose compared to patients who received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Patients treated with infliximab were more likely to receive a third (booster) dose of COVID-19 vaccine.

2.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22274608

ABSTRACT

IntroductionFew data exist regarding the immunogenicity of third dose of BNT162b2 relative to second dose in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on different immunosuppressive therapies. We investigated the immunogenicity of BNT162b2 vaccine booster dose in patients with IBD on infliximab combination therapy. MethodsThis is prospective single center observational study conducted between January 1st, 2022 until February 28th, 2022. Patients were recruited at the time of attendance at the infusion center. Eligibility criteria included patients with confirmed diagnosis of IBD who are receiving infliximab with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine and have received two or three-dose of BNT162b2 vaccine. Patients were excluded if they were infected or had symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 previously since the start of the pandemic or received other vaccines than the BNT162b2. Our primary outcome was the concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralizing antibodies 40-45 weeks from the first dose of BNT162b2 in patients with IBD receiving infliximab combination therapy. Medians with interquartile range (IQR) were calculated. Results162 patients with IBD and receiving infliximab combination therapy were recruited and the number of patients in each group was 81. Median (IQR) SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were significantly lower after the second dose [125 BAU/mL (43, 192)] compared to patients who received the third booster dose [207 BAU/mL (181, 234)] (p = 0.003). Neutralizing antibody levels were also lower after the second dose [80 BAU/mL (21, 95)] compared to patients who received the third booster dose [96 BAU/mL (93, 99)] (p = <0.001). The percentage of patients who achieved positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels in the third (booster) dose group was higher (96.3%) than those in second dose group (90%)(p = 0.026). Percentage of patients who received third (booster) dose and achieved positive SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibody level was 100%, whereas it was lower (88.9%) in patients who received second dose only (p=0.009). ConclusionMost patients with IBD on infliximab combination therapy had positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG and neutralizing antibody concentrations 40-45 weeks post BNT162b2 vaccination. However, SARS-CoV-2 IgG and neutralizing antibody concentrations were lower in patients who received 2 doses only compared to patients who received a third dose.

3.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22271342

ABSTRACT

IntroductionSARS-CoV-2 vaccination has been effective in protecting against severe COVID-19 infections and related mortality. It is recommended for all individuals including patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, safety data is lacking in this group of patients. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the short- and long-term vaccine related adverse events (AEs) in patients with IBD. MethodThis is a prospective, observational cohort study investigating short- and long-term AEs related to BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with IBD (study group) after first and second dose compared to healthy participants (study group). Patients were recruited at the time of attendance to clinic or infusion rooms. Short term (<3 weeks) localized and systemic AEs were assessed via questionnaire. Follow-up phone-based survey was made to collect data on long term (up to 24 weeks) AEs. ResultsA total of 408 patients answered the questionnaires, 204 patients in each group, the study and control group. No serious adverse events were reported in either the study nor the control group after the first or the second dose. Participants in the control group reported more frequent pain at the injection site than those in the study group after the first dose (58 (57%) vs 38 (37%) respectively, P-value= 0.005). After the second dose, tiredness was reported more frequently in the control group [49 (48%)] compared to the study group [25 (24%), (P-value<0.001)]. At 20-24 weeks post vaccination, 386 out of 408 (94.6%) patients were willing to participate in the follow-up phone based questionnaire (196 (96.1%) in the study group vs 190 (93.1%) in the control group). In both groups, none of the patients reported local, systemic or severe adverse events (0 out of 386) at week 20-244 post second dose. ConclusionThe BNT162b2 vaccine is safe in patients with IBD. No severe or long-term adverse events were reported in our study. The frequency of local and systemic adverse events after the second dose was generally higher among healthy participants compared to patients with IBD. Further studies including a larger cohort with longer follow-up duration are needed to assess for possible rare adverse events.

4.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21267237

ABSTRACT

BackgroundCOVID-19 Vaccinations have been shown to be effective in reducing risk of severe infection, hospitalization, and death. They also have been shown to be safe and effective in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on biologic therapies. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of vaccination among patients with IBD on biologic therapies. MethodsA single-center prospective cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care inflammatory bowel disease center. Data from patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who attended the gastroenterology infusion clinic from June 1st, 2021 until October 31st, 2021 were retrieved. Patients received infliximab or vedolizumab at least 6 weeks before recruitment were included. The primary outcome was prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination. The secondary outcome was to assess whether prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination differed based sex, age, type of biologic therapy and citizenship status. ResultsThe total number of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients enrolled in the study was 280 (56.0% male and 44.0% female). The median age was 33.2 years and BMI was 24.8 kg/m2. 112 patients with ulcerative colitis (40.0%) and 168 (60.0%) with Crohns disease. 117 (41.8%) were vaccinated with either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and 163 (58.2%) were not vaccinated. Female patients were more likely to receive the vaccine compared to male patients (83.0% vs. 63.8%, p < 0.001). In addition, older patients (above the age 50) were also more likely to receive the vaccine than younger patients, below the age of 50 (95.6% vs 31.2% p< 0.001). Expatriates were more likely to receive the vaccine than citizens (84.8% vs 25.0%, p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between patients on Infliximab and vedolizumab in terms of prevalence of vaccination (40.0% vs 48.0%, p= 0.34). ConclusionThe overall prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on biologic therapies was lower than the general population and world health organization (WHO) recommendation. Female patients, patients above the age of 50, and expatriates were more likely to be vaccinated. On the other hand, male patients, patients below the age of 50, and citizens were less likely to be vaccinated.

5.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21265718

ABSTRACT

IntroductionImmunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on biologics are not well studied. The goal of this study is to measure serological response to BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines in patients with IBD receiving different biologic therapies. MethodWe performed a multi-center prospective study between August 1st, 2021, and September 15th, 2021. We measured seropositivity of SARS-CoV2 antibodies, SARS-CoV-2 IgG and neutralizing antibody concentrations, in patients with IBD receiving biologic therapies between 4-10 weeks after second dose or 3-6 weeks after first dose of vaccination with BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines. ResultsThere were 126 patients enrolled (mean age, 31 years; 60% male; 71% Crohns disease, 29% ulcerative colitis). 92 patients were vaccinated with BNT162b2 vaccine (73%) and 34 patients with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (27%). The proportion of patients who achieved positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels after receiving 2 doses of the vaccine in patients treated with infliximab and adalimumab were 44 out of 59 patients (74.5%) and 13 out of 16 patients (81.2%), respectively. Whereas the proportion of patients who achieved positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels after receiving two doses of the vaccine in patients treated with ustekinumab and vedolizumab were 100% and 92.8%, respectively. In patients receiving infliximab and adalimumab, the proportion of patients who had positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody levels after two-dose vaccination was 40 out of 59 patients (67.7%) and 14 out 16 patients (87.5%), respectively. Whereas the proportions of patients who had positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody levels were 12 out of 13 patients (92.3%) and 13 out of 14 patients (92.8%) in patients receiving ustekinumab and vedolizumab. ConclusionThe majority of patients with IBD on infliximab, adalimumab, and vedolizumab seroconverted after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. All patients on ustekinumab seroconverted after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 SARS-CoV-2 are both likely to be effective after two doses in patients with IBD on biologics. A follow up larger studies are needed to evaluate if decay of antibodies occurs over time.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...