Prophylactic Colchicine After Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: The PAPERS Study.

BACKGROUND: Pericarditis is common after radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: Study investigators hypothesized an empirical post-AF ablation treatment protocol with colchicine may reduce the incidence and severity of pericarditis. PAPERS (Post-Ablation PEricarditis Reduction Study) aimed to quantify the risks and benefits associated with prophylactic use of colchicine to prevent pericarditis following AF ablation. METHODS: PAPERS is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study. Patients were randomized on the day of the procedure to receive no postprocedure prophylaxis (group A; standard of care arm) or colchicine 0.6 mg orally twice daily for 7 days starting immediately post-procedure (group B; study arm). All participants underwent a follow-up survey at 14 days postoperatively. The primary endpoint was the development of clinical pericarditis within 2 weeks following ablation. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of pericarditis by ablation type and medical therapy. RESULTS: Among 139 patients enrolled, 66 were randomized to standard of care (group A), and 73 patients were randomized to the colchicine arm (group B). The primary outcome of clinical pericarditis was reached in 7 of 66 (10.6%) patients in group A and in 7 of 73 (9.6%) patients in group B (P = 0.84). The rate of gastrointestinal discomfort was 10 of 66 (15%) in group A and 34 of 73 (47%) in group B (P < 0.001). There was an increased incidence of pericarditis in patients who underwent cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (17 of 50; 34%) in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (6 of 69; 8.7%; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic colchicine therapy initiated after the ablation procedure in patients with AF did not affect the incidence of post-ablation pericarditis and was associated with an increased incidence of gastrointestinal side effects.

Diagnostic utility of early premature ventricular complexes in differentiating atrioventricular reentrant and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardias.

BACKGROUND: His-refractory premature ventricular complexes perturbing a supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) establish the presence of an accessory pathway (AP). Earlier premature ventricular complexes (ErPVCs) may perturb SVTs but are considered nondiagnostic. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that an ErPVC will always show a difference >35 ms in its advancement of the next atrial activation during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). During atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), a PVC delivered close to the circuit can result in greater advancement of atrial activation due to retrograde conduction via an AP. Thus, an AP response, defined as ErPVC (H1S2) advancing the subsequent atrial activation (A1-A2) more than this minimum difference (A1A2 ≤ H1S2+35 ms), establishes the presence of an AP. METHODS: Sixty-five consecutive patients with SVT were retrospectively evaluated. ErPVCs were defined when the ventricular pacing stimulus was >35 ms ahead of the His during tachycardia. RESULTS: Among the 65 cases, 43 were AVNRT and 22 AVRT. Fourteen AVRT cases had an AP response with a mean H1S2+35 ms of 336 ± 58 ms and A1A2 of 309 ± 51ms. No AVNRT cases had an AP response. The specificity of an AP response to ErPVC in predicting AVRT was 100%. CONCLUSION: An AP response to PVCs (A1A2 ≤ H1S2+35 ms) is 100% specific for the presence of an AP.

Persistent 2-for-1 Atrioventricular Node Anterograde Conduction During a Supraventricular Tachycardia.

We present a case of persistent dual AV node conduction during AV node reentry tachycardia as a new clinical manifestation of 2-for-1 AV node conduction. The interpretation of the complex physiology ponders the possibility of an accessory pathway mediated atrioventricular reentry existing with more ventricular than atrial events.

Novel approach to intracardiac defibrillator placement in patients with atriopulmonary Fontan: Ventricular defibrillation with an atrial positioned ICD lead.

INTRODUCTION: The Fontan procedure, used to palliate univentricular physiology, eliminates direct venous access to the ventricle and complicates implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement. METHODS AND RESULTS: We describe two patients with Fontan palliation who underwent a novel transvenous approach to ICD placement. The approach uses a transvenous bipolar lead placed in a coronary sinus branch for ventricular sensing, and a defibrillation lead placed in the right atrium for atrial sensing and ventricular defibrillation. CONCLUSION: Transvenous ICD implantation is possible in some patients with an atriopulmonary Fontan. This approach avoids a redo sternotomy for epicardial leads and excludes the need for lead placement in the systemic circulation.

Mechanism and interpretation of two-for-one response to premature atrial complexes during atrioventricular node re-entry tachycardia.

AIMS: The response to premature atrial complexes (PACs) during tachycardia has been shown to differentiate atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from focal junctional tachycardia (JT). His refractory PAC (HrPACs) perturbing the next His (resetting with fusion) is diagnostic of AVNRT and such a late PAC fusing with the native beat cannot reset the focal source of JT. Early PAC advancing the immediate His with continuation of tachycardia suggests JT but can also occur in AVNRT due to simultaneous conduction through the AV nodal fast and slow pathways [two-for-one response (TFOR)]. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and mechanism of TFOR after early premature atrial complexes (ePACs) during AVNRT and to differentiate it from the known response to ePACs during JT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Typical AVNRT cases were diagnosed using standard criteria. We evaluated the responses to scanning PACs delivered during tachycardia in 100 patients undergoing AV node slow pathway modification for AVNRT. The responses to HrPACs and ePACs delivered from coronary sinus os or high right atrium were retrospectively reviewed. In 10 patients, ePACs advanced the immediate His with continuation of tachycardia. In all 10 cases, HrPACs advanced the next His, confirming AVNRT as the mechanism, and indicating a TFOR. CONCLUSION: A TFOR can occur in a small number of patients during AVNRT and is therefore not diagnostic of JT. However, HrPACs always perturbed the next His in these cases, confirming the diagnosis of AVNRT and allowing for differentiation from JT.

Avoiding Bladder Catheters During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine if atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can be performed safely without bladder catheterization. BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing AF ablation often receive bladder catheters. Catheterization is associated with potential complications. The ABCD-AF (Avoiding Bladder Catheters During Atrial Fibrillation) ablation study evaluates the advantages of performing AF ablation without routine catheterization. METHODS: In this single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial, 80 patients received bladder catheterization (group A), and 80 patients received only as-needed catheterization (group B). The primary endpoint was a composite of cystitis, urethral injury, hematuria, dysuria, or urinary retention. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 63 ± 13 years, and 33% of patients were female. The primary outcome was reached in 45 patients in group A and 11 patients in group B (p < 0.001). Urinary tract infection occurred in 7 patients in group A and 2 patients in group B (p = 0.17). Urinary retention occurred in 12 patients in group A and 5 patients in group B (p = 0.07). Randomization to catheterization carried an odds ratio of 8.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.7 to 17.5; p < 0.001), and male sex carried an odds ratio of 3.8 (95% CI: 1.7 to 8.6; p = 0.001) for the primary endpoint. On subgroup analysis, randomization to undergo catheterization had no association with the primary outcome in female patients but had an odds ratio of 14.6 (95% CI: 5.6 to 38.1; p < 0.001) in male patients. In multivariable analysis, sex and catheter status remained independently associated with the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder catheterization can be safely avoided in patients undergoing AF ablation and is associated with a significant reduction in adverse outcomes, especially in men.

Differentiating Atrioventricular Reentry Tachycardia and Atrioventricular Node Reentry Tachycardia Using Premature His Bundle Complexes.

BACKGROUND: Current maneuvers for differentiation of atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) and atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT) lack sensitivity and specificity for AVRT circuits located away from the site of pacing. We hypothesized that a premature His complex (PHC) will always perturb AVRT because the His bundle is obligatory to the circuit. Further, AVNRT could not be perturbed by a late PHC (≤20 ms ahead of the His) due to the retrograde His conduction time. Earlier PHCs can advance the AVNRT circuit but only by a quantity less than the prematurity of the PHC. METHODS: High-output pacing at the distal His location delivered PHCs. AVRT was predicted when late PHCs perturbed tachycardia or when earlier PHCs led to atrial advancement by an amount equal or greater than the degree of PHC prematurity. RESULTS: Among the 73 supraventricular tachycardias, the test accurately predicted AVRT (n=29) and AVNRT (n=44) in all cases. Late PHC advanced the circuit in all 29 AVRTs and none of the AVNRTs (sensitivity and specificity, 100%). With earlier PHCs, the degree of atrial advancement was equal or greater than the PHC prematurity in 26/29 AVRTs and none of the AVNRTs (90% sensitivity and 100% specificity). The mean prematurity of the PHC required to perturb AVNRT was 48 ms (range, 28-70 ms) and the advancement less than the prematurity of the PHC (mean, 32 ms; range, 18-54 ms). CONCLUSIONS: The responses to PHCs distinguished AVRT and AVNRT with 100% specificity and sensitivity.

Predictors of successful ultrasound-guided lead implantation.

BACKGROUND: Technical advances have improved the safety of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) insertion, but periprocedural complications persist. Despite ultrasound (US) guidance for vascular access being feasible and exhibiting shorter fluoroscopy times, it is not widely adopted for insertion of CIEDs. Thus, we studied the use of US for CIED insertion to (1) quantify the success rate of venous cannulation, (2) identify predictors of failed cannulation, and (3) quantify the rate of complications using US guidance. METHODS: We studied 166 consecutive patients who underwent US-guided CIED implantation. Anatomic parameters of the axillary vein were measured. The primary outcome was success (group 1) or failure (group 2) to obtain vascular access utilizing US guidance. Secondary outcomes included pneumothorax and hematoma. RESULTS: Successful US-guided cannulation occurred in 154 of 166 patients (93%). No patient had a pneumothorax. Hematoma occurred in 1 of 166 patients (0.01%). Group 2 exhibited higher male proportion at 11 of 12 (92%) compared with 94 of 154 (61%) in group 1 (P = .03), increased vein depth at 3.84 versus 2.85 cm (P = .003), more right-sided implants (P = .03), higher weight at 104.6 versus 85.3 kg (P = .017), higher body mass index at 35.6 versus 29.2 kg/m2 (P = .049), and higher body surface area at 2.24 versus 1.99 m2 (P = .013). Other parameters were statistically nonsignificant. In multivariate analysis, vein depth remained significantly associated with failure. CONCLUSION: Using US guidance for CIED implantation is successful in the vast majority (93%) of patients. Rare cases of unsuccessful cannulation were associated with right-sided implants and increased venous depth.

Avoiding Urinary Catheterization in Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation.

PURPOSE: Indwelling urinary catheters are commonly inserted when administering general anesthesia. However, there are significant risks to routine IUC insertion. We compared urinary and other outcomes in a population of patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with or without IUC. METHODS: This was a single center, retrospective review of patients undergoing AF ablation. Patients were identified by procedure codes and patient health characteristics and outcome data were manually extracted from electronic health records. The primary composite endpoint was 7-day periprocedural urinary outcomes including cystitis, dysuria, hematuria, urethral damage, or urinary retention. RESULTS: 404 patients were included in the study, 297 with IUC and 107 without IUC. Uncatheterized patients were less likely to have congestive heart failure (CHF) (31.8% vs 43.4%; P = 0.039) and had a shorter procedure length (4.2 vs 4.9 hours; P < 0.001) with less fluid administered (1485 vs 2040 mL; P < 0.001). No urinary complications occurred in the uncatheterized group versus 14 in the catheterized group (P = 0.026). 3 patients in the uncatheterized group developed serious infections versus none in the catheterized group (P = 0.018). There was no incidence of death and no statistically significant difference in readmission in the 30 days after procedure. CONCLUSIONS: There were no urinary complications in 107 patients who received no IUC during AF ablation. Avoiding bladder catheters during AF ablation procedures may lower incidence of adverse urinary complications without adding substantial risk of urinary retention.

Troubleshooting electromagnetic interference in a patient with centrifugal flow left ventricular assist device and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

A 25-year-old man with severe nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy underwent subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) implant and subsequently underwent HeartWare ventricular assist device (HVAD) placement. Postoperative interrogation revealed both primary and secondary S-ICD vectors inappropriately regarded sinus rhythm as "noise," and the alternate vector significantly undersensed sinus rhythm. The S-ICD was reinterrogated using high-resolution capture to visually confirm EMI with a dominant frequency in both the primary and secondary vectors of 46.67 Hz that fell within the S-ICD operational range of 9-60 Hz. The 46.67 Hz frequency correlated with the HVAD operational speed of 2,800 RPM. The HVAD pump speed was increased from 2,800 to 3,000 RPM, resulting in a dominant frequency of 50 Hz. The notch filter is nonprogrammable in S-ICDs. However, the built-in filter is 50 Hz for countries in European time zones as opposed to 60 Hz in US time zones due to differences in the anticipated noise from electrical sources within each continent. Thus, the S-ICD time zone was reprogrammed from EST to GMT, which reduced the notch filter from 60  to 50 Hz, resulting in S-ICD successfully eliminating EMI when the patient was in a supine position. The EMI interference was still intermittently present in the upright patient position. This case demonstrates the utility of high-resolution electrogram capture to identify the source and frequency of EMI in S-ICD and offers a potential avenue to troubleshoot dominant frequency oversensing by changing the device time zone.