Effect of pentoxifylline on endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress and inflammatory markers in STEMI patients.

Aim: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients suffer higher mortality and adverse outcomes linked to endothelial dysfunction (ED). Methods: 43 patients were randomized to pentoxifylline (PTX) 400 mg thrice daily (n = 22) or placebo (n = 21). Soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, malondialdehyde, interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were assessed at baseline and 2 months. Results: After 2 months, no significant difference was observed in markers' levels between the 2 groups. However, a within-group comparison revealed a statistically significant change in hs-CRP in the PTX group (10.057 (9.779-10.331) versus 9.721 (6.102-10.191)), p = 0.032. Conclusion: PTX for 2 months in STEMI patients was safe and well-tolerated but had no significant detectable effect on ED, oxidative stress or inflammatory markers. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04367935 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

This study examined the effect and the safety of a drug called pentoxifylline in patients who have recently had a heart attack. Pentoxifylline can possibly reduce inflammation and is used for patients with blood flow issues. The study involved 43 participants, 22 receiving pentoxifylline and 21 receiving a placebo for 2 months. We measured different markers related to inflammation and heart health before and after. Overall, there was no significant difference between the groups, but patients who received pentoxifylline experienced less inflammation according to only one of the markers measured. This study concluded that the prescription of pentoxifylline after a heart attack is safe, well-tolerated and without notable side effects. Still, we recommend larger and longer studies to be sure of its effect.

Assessment of neonatal intensive care unit nurses' compliance with standard precautions of infection control and identification of enabling factors.

Background: Rigorous implementation of infection prevention and control practices by healthcare workers in different healthcare settings is of utmost importance. Neonates, particularly preterm babies in neonatal intensive care units, are a vulnerable population at high risk for developing nosocomial infections. Nurses have the greatest risk of spreading healthcare-associated infections among patients and healthcare workers. This study was conducted to assess the compliance of neonatal intensive care unit nurses with standard precautions of infection control and to identify the potential influencing factors. Results: This was a cross-sectional study, whereby the compliance of a total of 58 neonatal intensive care unit nurses with standard precautions of infection control was assessed using the Arabic version of the Compliance with Standard Precautions Scale (CSPS-A). Student's t test, ANOVA test, and post hoc test were used for analysis.A suboptimal compliance rate (66.7%) was detected, with the highest for disposal of sharp articles into sharps boxes (86.2%) and the lowest for disposal of sharps box not only when full (27.6%). Significant differences were observed when participants were grouped according to their clinical experience and qualifications, where participants with longer clinical experience displayed higher mean scores for the use of protective devices score (P = 0.024), disposal of sharps score (P = 0.003), and total CSPS score (P = 0.006). Conclusions: Clinical experience and educational qualifications are key factors that impact nurses' compliance with infection control practices. Nurses should receive up-to-date evidence-based educational and practical sessions that link theory to clinical practice and elucidate the importance of accurate implementation of proper infection prevention and control practices.

Comparison of Warfarin Initiation at 3 mg Versus 5 mg for Anticoagulation of Patients with Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: The increased warfarin sensitivity observed after mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) operations dictates clinical discretion in warfarin dose initiation. Evidence is still lacking with regard to anticoagulation management of MVR patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare initiating warfarin at the recommended dosing regimen versus empirically lowered doses intended to account for the variation in warfarin sensitivity. METHODS: A prospective, single-blind, randomized, comparative study was conducted in postoperative MVR patients. Patients were randomly assigned to either the 5 mg group (n = 25) or the 3 mg group (n = 25) and were initiated on a 5 or 3 mg warfarin dose, respectively. Time to target international normalized ratio (INR), time in therapeutic range, occurrence of bleeding/thromboembolic events, and cost of bridging with enoxaparin were assessed for both groups. RESULTS: Target INR was achieved earlier in the 5 mg group than in the 3 mg group (p = 0.033), with a mean ± SD of 5.3 ± 2.0 and 6.6 ± 2.0, respectively (95% confidence interval of the mean difference 1.022-1.890). Bleeding events did not differ significantly between the two groups. The cost of enoxaparin consumption per patient was significantly higher in the 3 mg group versus the 5 mg group (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The initiation of warfarin at a 5 mg dose in MVR patients was more efficacious than the 3 mg dose in terms of time to reach the target INR. Moreover, the cost of enoxaparin bridging was significantly reduced with a 5 mg warfarin initiation dose. Bleeding events were comparable. GOV ID: NCT04235569, 22 January 2020.

Physicians' adherence to evidence-based guidelines as a major predictor of anticoagulant-related medication error incidence and severity.

AIMS: Anticoagulants represent a main source of medication errors (MEs) and complications that have catastrophic implications, posing an obligation on health care providers to assess anticoagulant-related MEs and factors affecting their occurrence. This study investigates the occurrence and severity of prescribing MEs in patients on anticoagulants and explores their potential predictors. METHODS: This study was a prospective cohort study in a tertiary hospital on 116 patients with a total of 2166 anticoagulant doses. RESULTS: Forty-four percent of prescribed anticoagulant doses resulted in MEs with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) causing 61% and 34%, respectively, of the total MEs. More than 50% of all MEs were incorrect doses (high and low) shared between heparin and tinzaparin. The highest severity of error was Category D followed by Category F and Category C. A Poisson regression analysis model revealed that female (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.54, P < .001), bridging (IRR 1.52; 95% CI 1.10-2.09; P = .011), venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis (IRR 7.65; 95% CI 4.88-12.02; P < .001), physician non-adherence (IRR 2.71; 95% CI 2.22-3.29; P < .001), and polypharmacy (IRR 1.68; 95% CI 1.26-2.23; P = .036) were predictors of the higher incidence of MEs. Ordinal logistic regression analysis demonstrated that physician non-adherence (OR 24.67; 95% CI 5.54-207; P < .001) was the main predictor of increased error severity. CONCLUSION: The major predictor in increasing both the incidence and severity of MEs is physician adherence to evidence-based guidelines (EBG). Strict regulations for anticoagulant prescribing through an anticoagulant stewardship program are a necessity.

Impact of Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation on proinflammatory cytokines release and the development of Necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm Neonates: A randomized controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: Preterm neonates have under-developed immune-regulatory system; consequently, there is a risk for developing chronic inflammation. Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is an acute devastating neonatal intestinal inflammatory disorder. Due to the obscure multifactorial etiology, early diagnosis and effective treatment of NEC are limited. Consequently, effective strategies in the prevention of NEC, including nutritional approaches, are critically needed. The current study was conducted to assess the potential immunomodulatory effect of Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) supplementation in preterm neonates at neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and subsequently its effect on preventing or reducing NEC incidence. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled study. A total of 67 neonates, with gestational age equal or less than 32 weeks at birth and weight less than or equal 1500 g, were randomly assigned to either DHA group or the control group. Modified Bell's staging criteria for NEC was used as an objective tool for diagnosis and staging of NEC. Levels of Interleukin 1 beta (IL-1ß) were measured at baseline and after 10 days. Mortality and NICU length of stay (LOS) were also monitored. RESULTS: Thirty neonates of each group completed the study. A statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding diagnosis and staging of NEC (p = 0.0001). There was also a statistically significant difference between DHA group 22(73.3), 95% CI [55.9, 86.5] and the control group 8 (26.7), 95% CI [13.5, 44.1] in the percentage change in IL-1ß levels (p = 0.0001).A statistically significant association was found between IL and 1 ß change and NEC diagnosis (p = 0.001). NICU LOS was significantly lower among DHA group 21.63 ± 6.67 compared to the control group 25.07 ± 4.67 (p = 0.025). Mortality n (%) among the control group 4 (11.8) was higher than DHA group 3 (9.1), however, no significant difference was detected (p = 1.0). CONCLUSION: Findings of this study suggest that enteral DHA supplementation can reduce NEC incidence in preterm neonates through its immunoregulatory effect that modulates production of regulatory cytokines.Trial registration: Registered at clinical trials.gov (NCT03700957), 6 October 2018.

Impact of lipophilic vs hydrophilic statins on the clinical outcome and biomarkers of remodelling in heart failure patients: A prospective comparative randomized study.

AIMS: There are insufficient direct comparative studies addressing the impact of the type of statin on their respective efficacy in heart failure (HF). The aim of the current study was to compare the effects of lipophilic (atorvastatin) vs hydrophilic (rosuvastatin) on left ventricular function, inflammatory and fibrosis biomarkers in patients with chronic HF. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, comparative, parallel study. A total of 85 patients with chronic HF optimized on guideline directed therapy were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 40 mg (n = 42) or rosuvastatin 20 mg (n = 43) for 6 months. Baseline and follow-up assessment included 2D echocardiography, measurement of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, interleukin-6 and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) levels, liver enzymes and lipid profile. RESULTS: The increase in left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly higher in the atorvastatin group compared to the rosuvastatin group (6.5% [3-11] vs 4% [2-5], P = .006). The reduction in left ventricular end diastolic and end systolic volume was comparable between the 2 groups. The decrease in sST2 levels in pg/mL was significantly higher in the atorvastatin compared to the rosuvastatin group (-255 [-383 to -109.8 vs - 151 [-216 to -69], P = .003). There was a significant reduction in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and interleukin-6 levels in both groups, yet the reduction was comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: The study results suggest that lipophilic atorvastatin is superior to hydrophilic rosuvastatin in increasing left ventricular ejection fraction and reducing fibrosis marker sST2 in HF patients. Trial registration ID: NCT03255044, registered on 21 August 2017.