Zika virus antibody-positivity among symptomatic/asymptomatic pregnant women in the Aseer region displays pre-exposure to dengue viruses.

Antibody cross-reactivity among flaviviruses is a major limitation in understanding the prevalence without vector control measures. In this study, we investigated the presence of Zika virus (ZIKV)-specific antibodies and the significance of their cross-reactivity with other flaviviruses, which could affect the serological specificity in both symptomatic and asymptomatic pregnant women. Among the results obtained from 217 serum samples tested for ZIKV-specific IgM and IgG, no specific predictions regarding seropositivity or exposure due to extensive cross-reactivity with dengue virus (DENV) serology could be made. Clear-cut positivity was observed in 1.8% (n = 4) and 1.0% (n = 2) for ZIKV IgM and IgG, respectively. The same samples assessed for DENV showed 1.3% (n = 3) seropositivity each for IgM and IgG levels. None of the samples were positive for ZIKV and DENV IgM or IgG. However, one sample (0.4%) tested positive for ZIKV and DENV IgM. No significant correlation was observed between DENV IgM and IgG when comparing the overlapped serotiters. On the other hand, the ZIKV IgG-positive sample showed higher serotiters for DENV IgG, indicating cross-reactivity with ZIKV but without statistical significance. Therefore, screening for the incidence of ZIKV becomes particularly challenging in a population where the presence or pre-exposure to DENV is observed. Our observations further suggest that unless flavivirus prevalence is properly addressed, determining the prevalence of ZIKV antibodies, which may be confounded with other uninvestigated flaviviruses, will be complicated.

Zika virus antibody-positivity among symptomatic/asymptomatic pregnant women in the Aseer region displays pre-exposure to dengue viruses

@#Antibody cross-reactivity among flaviviruses is a major limitation in understanding the prevalence without vector control measures. In this study, we investigated the presence of Zika virus (ZIKV)-specific antibodies and the significance of their cross-reactivity with other flaviviruses, which could affect the serological specificity in both symptomatic and asymptomatic pregnant women. Among the results obtained from 217 serum samples tested for ZIKV-specific IgM and IgG, no specific predictions regarding seropositivity or exposure due to extensive cross-reactivity with dengue virus (DENV) serology could be made. Clear-cut positivity was observed in 1.8% (n = 4) and 1.0% (n = 2) for ZIKV IgM and IgG, respectively. The same samples assessed for DENV showed 1.3% (n = 3) seropositivity each for IgM and IgG levels. None of the samples were positive for ZIKV and DENV IgM or IgG. However, one sample (0.4%) tested positive for ZIKV and DENV IgM. No significant correlation was observed between DENV IgM and IgG when comparing the overlapped serotiters. On the other hand, the ZIKV IgG-positive sample showed higher serotiters for DENV IgG, indicating cross-reactivity with ZIKV but without statistical significance. Therefore, screening for the incidence of ZIKV becomes particularly challenging in a population where the presence or pre-exposure to DENV is observed. Our observations further suggest that unless flavivirus prevalence is properly addressed, determining the prevalence of ZIKV antibodies, which may be confounded with other uninvestigated flaviviruses, will be complicated.

CD24 shows early upregulation and nuclear expression but is not a prognostic marker in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The putative stem cell marker CD24 is a small, heavily glycosylated, cell surface molecule which was originally associated with tumour metastasis. Recently it has been reported to be upregulated and of prognostic importance in colorectal tumours. The study aims to study the prognostic value of CD24 in a large series of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: CD24 protein expression was examined by immunohistochemistry. A total of 10 whole tissue sections (WTS) of adenoma and 345 CRCs arranged as tissue microarrays (TMAs) were evaluated. For comparison with non-neoplastic tissue, 10 WTS containing tumour with associated non-neoplastic tissue were also studied. RESULTS: None of the samples of normal tissue (adjacent to tumour) showed CD24 expression. In the tumours, CD24 expression was seen on the luminal surface of the cells, within the cytoplasm and, unexpectedly, also within the nucleus. Positive immunostaining was seen in 9/10 (90%) adenomas and 313/345 (91%) of CRCs. Weak statistical associations were found between CD24 expression and some clinicopathological features. In contrast to other published studies, however, the analysis did not show any association between CD24 expression and poor prognosis-if anything it was found that loss of CD24 expression appeared to be more related to poor outcome. CONCLUSION: Upregulation of CD24 is an early and common event during the development of CRC and it may be expressed in any cellular compartment, including the nucleus. CD24 is not, however, a good prognostic marker in CRC.