Endovascular or open surgical treatment of high-risk patients with infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischemia.

Aim To determine preferable type of treatment in our clinical circumstances by following two groups of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI), who were treated endovascularly and surgically. Methods Research was carried out in the form of a prospective study of 80 patients with CLI and Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C or D type of arterial disease, with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class III risk, who were randomly divided in two groups as per the treatment they received, surgical and endovascular. Patients were followed during 28 months using clinical examination and Duplex Ultrasound (DUS) in accordance with prescheduled control visits. Results There was a statistical difference between surgical and endovascular group in two years patency (82.5% vs. 55%; p=0.022) but it did not result in the difference in amputation free survival (AFS) (95% vs. 85%; p=0.171) or two-year freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE) (87.5 vs. 77.5; p=0.254). Also, there was no difference in the overall survival of patients (100% vs. 97.5%; p=0.317). Conclusion Initial endovascular treatment is a preferred form of the treatment for selected patient population.

Distal vein patch as a form of autologus modification for infragenicular prosthetic bypass.

INTRODUCTION: Preferred graft for infragenicular bypass is autologus vein. The problem is when there is not available autologus vein. Literature suggest that in these situations, prosthetic graft with some form of modification of distal anastomosis with autogenic tissue is valuable adjunctive. Frequently used modifications are Miller's cuff, Taylor's patch and St. Mary's boot. Recently, there are reports on "Distal vein patch" as a form of autologus modification which, due to its simplicity and patency rate, attracted attention. The aim of this study was to evaluate benefits of this novel modification by comparing its patencies with other autologus modification of distal anastomosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Study was performed on 60 patients, diabetics, with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Patients were divided in two groups: Group with distal vein patch modification; and group with some other form modification - control group. Patients were followed at least 22 months. We examined patency of grafts by physical examination or using Color Doppler. For statistical purposes we used KIaplan Meier analysis and curve. Significance was determined by Mann-Whitney, Fisher's exact, Pearsons chi square or Student T test as appropriate. P value less than 0,05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Groups were fairly matched relative to demographics, risk factors, operative intervention and distal anastomosis site. There was not statistical difference in two year primary patency between distal vein patch and control group--50% vs 53% respectivly (X2 = 0,08; p = 0,773). Also, there was not statistically significant difference in extremity survival (77% vs 77%) and patient survival between groups (89% vs 93%; X2 = 2,458; p = 0,117). CONCLUSION: This study proved equivalent patencies of infragenicular prosthetic bypasses performed using distal vein patch technique as with any other modification of distal anastomosis.

Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach in aorto iliac occlusive disease.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the fact that the transperitoneal approach (TP) is most widely accepted approach to the aortic surgery because it is simple, fast, and provides good exposure of the abdominal cavity and vascular structures, lately have been increasingly advocated as an alternative retroperitoneal (RP) approach in order to avoid entering peritoneal sac, achieving lower physiological trauma and faster establishment of gastrointestinal function. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the basic peri and postoperative results of TP and RP approaches in the surgical treatment of AIOD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 114 patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) that underwent surgical treatment at the Department of Vascular Surgery, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo from January 2010 until December 2012 year. In view of the surgical technique used subjects were divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 57 patients on who had been used RP approach, and group B 57 subjects with TP used approach. RESULTS: In patients from group A were observed significantly lower values: the length of operation (201.66 +/- 43.9 minute vs. 267.36 +/- 47.57 min, p < 0.001), amount of postoperative drainage (56.14 +/- 55.5 ml versus 130.71 +/- 92.34 ml, p < 0.001), length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) (1.10 +/- 0.36 days versus 2.46 +/- 1.25 days, p < 0.001), time required for the restoration of gastrointestinal motility (4.38 +/- 5.59 versus 1.05 days +/- 1.19 days, p < 0.001), length of hospitalization (9.26 +/- 1, 95 +/- 11 days versus 1.96 days, p < 0.001), costs of hospitalization (2394.98 +/- BAM 346.67 versus 2933.72 +/- 428.10 BAM, p < 0.001). Analysis of the incidence of postoperative complications (8 vs. 7 complication complications, p > 0.05) and mortality (3 versus 3, p > 0.05) showed no statistically significant difference between the analyzed groups. CONCLUSION: RP approach in vascular reconstructive surgery in AIOD offers better postoperative results when compared to TP approach.