Timing of fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: Rationale and design of the OPTION-STEMI trial.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend complete revascularization (CR) in hemodynamically stable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD). With regard to the timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-infarct-related artery (non-IRA), recent randomized clinical trials have revealed that immediate CR was non-inferior to staged CR. However, the optimal timing of CR remains uncertain. The OPTION-STEMI trial compared immediate CR and in-hospital staged CR guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) for intermediate stenosis of the non-IRA. METHODS: The OPTION-STEMI is a multicenter, investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial. The study included patients with at least 1 non-IRA lesion with ≥50% stenosis by visual estimation. Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomized into 2 groups at a 1:1 ratio: immediate CR (i.e., PCI for the non-IRA performed during primary angioplasty) or in-hospital staged CR. In the in-hospital staged CR group, PCI for non-IRA lesions was performed on another day during the index hospitalization. Non-IRA lesions with 50%-69% stenosis by visual estimation were evaluated by FFR, whereas those with ≥70% stenosis was revascularized without FFR. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and all unplanned revascularization at 1 year after randomization. Enrolment began in December 2019 and was completed in January 2024. The follow-up for the primary endpoint will be completed in January 2025, and primary results will be available in the middle of 2025. CONCLUSIONS: The OPTION-STEMI is a multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized trial that evaluated the timing of in-hospital CR with the aid of FFR in patients with STEMI and MVD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov. Unique identifier: NCT04626882; and URL: https://cris.nih.go.kr. Unique identifier: KCT0004457.

Optimal timing of percutaneous coronary intervention for non-ST elevated myocardial infarction with congestive heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the optimal timing for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with NSTEMI complicated by heart failure (HF). METHODS: In total, 762 patients with NSTEMI and HF in a multicenter, prospective registry in South Korea were classified according to the Killip classification (Killip class 2, n = 414 and Killip class 3, n = 348) and underwent early (within 24 h) and delayed (after 24 h) PCI. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality which was further analyzed with landmark analysis with two months as a cut-off. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, in-hospital cardiogenic shock (CS), readmission due to HF, and acute myocardial infarction during follow-up. RESULTS: Delayed PCI was associated with lower rates of 2-month mortality (6.1 % vs. 15.8 %, p = 0.007) and in-hospital CS (4.3 % vs. 14.1 %, p = 0.003), along with lower risks of 2-month mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.38, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.18-0.83, p = 0.014), in-hospital CS (HR = 0.29, 95 % CI = 0.12-0.71, p = 0.006) in multivariate Cox models of Killip class 3 patients. There was no statistical difference of incidence and risk of all predefined outcomes according to varying timing of PCI in Killip 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, the timing of PCI in patients with NSTEMI complicated by HF should be determined based on HF severity. Delayed PCI should be considered in patients with NSTEMI and more severe HF.

Early Left Ventricular Unloading or Conventional Approach After Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: The EARLY-UNLOAD Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Although venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is beneficial for the treatment of profound cardiogenic shock, peripheral VA-ECMO cannulation can increase left ventricular afterload, thus compromising myocardial recovery. We investigated whether early routine left ventricular unloading can reduce 30-day mortality compared with the conventional approach in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing VA-ECMO. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial involved 116 patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing VA-ECMO from March 2021 to September 2022 at Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea. The patients were randomly assigned to undergo either early routine left ventricular unloading with transseptal left atrial cannulation within 12 hours after randomization (n=58) or the conventional approach, which permitted rescue transseptal left atrial cannulation in case of an increased left ventricular afterload (n=58). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days. RESULTS: All 116 randomized patients (mean age, 67.6±13.5 years; 34 [29.3%] women) completed the trial. At 30 days, all-cause death had occurred in 27 (46.6%) patients in the early group and 26 (44.8%) patients in the conventional group (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.59-1.74]; P=0.942). Crossover to rescue transseptal left atrial cannulation occurred in 29 patients (50%) in the conventional group according to a clear indication. Time to rescue transseptal cannulation in the conventional group was a median of 21.8 (interquartile range, 12.4-52.2) hours after randomization. There were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes between the 2 groups except for a shorter time to disappearance of pulmonary congestion in the early group (median, 3 [interquartile range, 2-6] versus 5 [interquartile range, 3-7] days; P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing VA-ECMO, early routine left ventricular unloading with transseptal left atrial cannulation did not reduce 30-day mortality compared with the conventional strategy, which permitted rescue transseptal left atrial cannulation. These findings should be cautiously interpreted until the results of multicenter trials using other unloading modalities become available. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04775472.

Impact of sex difference on clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction patients with single-vessel and multi-vessel disease: based on Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health.

Background: Several studies have compared clinical outcomes according to sex in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, studies evaluating sex differences in clinical outcomes of single-vessel disease (SVD) and multi-vessel disease (MVD) in Korean patients with AMI are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze sex differences in the clinical characteristics of patients with AMI with SVD and MVD and to evaluate the impact of sex differences on the clinical outcomes in patients with AMI with SVD and MVD. Methods: A total of 11,002 AMI patients from November 2011 to June 2015 in the Korea AMI Registry, National Institute of Health, were enrolled. The current study was retrospective observational study. Patients were divided into SVD (n=5,644) and MVD (n=5,358) groups, and clinical impact of sex difference were analyzed by propensity score matching analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression model. Results: Women were older and had poor baseline clinical characteristics than men. Propensity score-matched analysis of men and women with SVD and MVD revealed that the adjusted 3-year risk of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (15.0% vs. 9.4%; hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.13; P=0.020) was higher in women with SVD aged <65 years. However, the incidence and risk of MACE were similar for men and women with MVD, and those with SVD aged ≥65 years. Conclusions: In the present study of Korean patients with AMI, women were older and exhibited a higher prevalence of comorbidities than men. Women with SVD aged <65 years had a significantly higher risk of MACE.

Culprit lesion plaque characteristics and angiopoietin like 4 in acute coronary syndrome: A virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound analysis.

BACKGROUND: Thin-cap fibroatheroma is a rupture-prone vulnerable plaque that leads to acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, its underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Several studies have investigated the clinical association between angiopoietin-like protein 4 (ANGPTL4) and coronary artery disease. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the correlation of plasma ANGPTL4 in culprit lesion of ACS patients using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and virtual-histology IVUS (VH-IVUS). METHODS: Fifty patients newly diagnosed with ACS between March to September 2021 were selected. Blood samples for baseline laboratory tests, including ANGPTL4, were collected before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and all pre- and post-PCI IVUS examinations were performed of the culprit lesions. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis between plasma ANGPTL4 and grayscale IVUS/VH-IVUS parameters revealed that plasma ANGPTL4 was strongly correlated with the necrotic core (NC) of the minimal lumen site (r = -0.666, p = 0.003) and largest NC site (r = -0.687, p < 0.001), and patients with lower plasma ANGPTL4 levels showed a significantly higher proportion of TFCA. CONCLUSION: The present study further demonstrated the protective role of ANGPTL4 in the spectrum of atherosclerotic development in patients with ACS by culprit lesion morphology analysis using IVUS and VH-IVUS.

Early left ventricular unloading after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: rationale and design of EARLY-UNLOAD trial.

AIMS: The clinical benefits of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for profound cardiogenic shock are well known. However, peripheral VA-ECMO increases the left ventricular afterload, thus compromising myocardial recovery. Recent studies have revealed the benefit of left ventricular unloading using various methods applied at different times. The EARLY-UNLOAD trial compares the clinical outcomes of early left ventricular unloading and conventional approach after VA-ECMO. METHODS AND RESULTS: The EARLY-UNLOAD trial is a single-centre, open-label, randomized trial that recruited 116 patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing VA-ECMO. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to two groups: routine left ventricular unloading via intracardiac echocardiography-guided transseptal left atrial cannulation within 12 h of VA-ECMO initiation or conventional approach that indicates rescue left ventricular unloading if clinical signs of an increased left ventricular afterload are present. The primary endpoint is the cumulative incidence of all-cause death within 30 days, and patients will be followed-up for 12 months. A key secondary endpoint is a composite measure of all-cause death and rescue transseptal left atrial cannulation in the conventional group (suggestive of VA-ECMO treatment failure) within 30 days. The enrolment of patients was finished in September 2022. CONCLUSIONS: The EARLY-UNLOAD trial is the first randomized controlled trial to compare early left ventricular unloading and conventional approach after VA-ECMO using the same unloading modality. The results could impact clinical practice to overcome the haemodynamic issues associated with VA-ECMO.

Different outcomes between iso-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media in acute myocardial infarction with renal impairment.

BACKGROUND: The selection of appropriate contrast media (CM) remains an important issue in terms of renal preservation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and renal impairment scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with AMI and renal impairment, depending on the CM type (iso-osmolar CM [IOCM] vs. low-osmolar CM [LOCM]) that was used during PCI. METHODS: From the Convergent Registry of Catholic and Chonnam University for Acute Myocardial Infarction, 3174 post-PCI patients with AMI and renal impairment were subdivided into two groups (IOCM [n = 2101] and LOCM [n = 1073]). RESULTS: Regarding in-hospital clinical outcomes, the IOCM group had a higher peak creatinine (Cr) level and lower "Cr differential" than the LOCM group. A higher proportion of dialysis was noted in the IOCM group. In 30-day clinical outcomes, the IOCM group showed higher incidence of new-onset heart failure (HF) but lower incidence of revascularization than the LOCM group. The differences in in-hospital and 30-day clinical outcomes were attenuated after inverse probability of treatment weighting, except for new-onset HF. All other variables in 30-day clinical outcomes, including all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accidents, stent thrombosis, and any dialysis events, were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: IOCM use did not prevent future incidence of dialysis compared to LOCM use in AMI patients with renal impairment.

Long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock according to the application and initiation time of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available regarding the proper application time and long-term outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with cardiogenic shock. This cohort study appraised the clinical outcomes according to ECMO application without or before cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) combined with cardiogenic shock. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2015, a total of 13,104 patients with AMI were enrolled in a nationwide AMI registry. Eligible patients with cardiogenic shock, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, with a 3-year clinical follow-up, were analyzed. The 949 included patients were divided into two groups: no ECMO (n = 845) and ECMO application (n = 104). The ECMO group was further divided into ECMO without or before CPR (n = 11) and ECMO after CPR (n = 93). RESULTS: Significant differences were noted in major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) between the no ECMO and ECMO application groups during the 3-year follow-up (41.5% vs. 80.8%; p < 0.001). However, the ECMO without or before CPR group showed similar outcomes to the no ECMO group in 3-year MACEs (63.6% vs. 41.5%; p = 0.055). MACEs during 3 years of follow-up were significantly lower in the ECMO without or before CPR group than in the ECMO after CPR group (63.6% vs. 82.8%; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A significantly lower risk of major cardiac events in ECMO without or before CPR suggests that early application of ECMO can be a reasonable strategy to improve outcomes in patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Incidence, Predictive Factors and Long-Term Clinical Impact of Left Ventricular Remodeling According to the Completeness of Revascularization in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease.

In this study, we identified several factors related to left ventricular remodeling (LVR) and examined the impact of LVR on the prognosis of patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction and multivessel disease treated with complete (CR) or incomplete (IR) revascularization. LVR was defined as an LV end-diastolic diameter >55 mm. A total of 262 patients without LVR at presentation were followed up with echocardiography between 1 month and 1 year. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death (AD), MI, and heart failure (HF), referred to as a major adverse cardiovascular endpoint (MACE). Then, each variable was analyzed as a secondary outcome. Follow-up echocardiography identified 26 patients (9.9%) with LVR. LVR was associated with an initial LV ejection fraction <50%, Killip 3 disease at presentation, and a peak troponin I level >70 mg/dL. Survival analysis showed an association between LVR and adverse outcomes only in the IR group, in which the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was increased for the MACE (HR = 3.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.19−8.71, p = 0.002) and HF (HR = 21.37, 95% CI = 4.47−102.09, p< 0.001), but not for the CR group. In STEMI with MVD, LVR within the first year after percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with worse outcomes in the IR but not the CR group.

Predictors of recurrent acute myocardial infarction despite successful percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recurrent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an adverse cardiac event in patients with a first AMI. The predictors of recurrent AMI after the first AMI in patients who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have not been elucidated. METHODS: We analyzed the data collected from 9,869 patients (63.2 ± 12.4 years, men:women = 7,446:2,423) who were enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health between November 2011 and October 2015, had suffered their first AMI and had received successful PCI during the index hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent predictors of recurrent AMI following the first AMI. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of recurrent AMI after successful PCI was 3.6% (359/9,869). According to the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the significant predictive factors for recurrent AMI were diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, atypical chest pain, and multivessel disease. CONCLUSION: In this Korean prospective cohort study, the independent predictors of recurrent AMI after successful PCI for the first AMI were diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, atypical chest pain, and multivessel disease.

Long-term clinical outcomes of type 1 vs. type 2 myocardial infarction in patients who underwent angiography: data from the Korea acute myocardial infarction-national institute of health registry.

Background: In the cause of increase the clinical research observational evidence on type 2 myocardial infraction (T2MI), the study compared the characteristics of T2MI and T1MI with respect to major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and mortality as long-term outcomes from a large, nationwide, prospective Korean cohort registry. Methods: From 13,105 consecutively enrolled individuals in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction-National Institute of Health (KAMIR-NIH) registry between October 2011 and December 2015, 11,053 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients were divided into the T1MI (n=10,545) and T2MI (n=508) groups. All patients completed ≥3 years of follow-up. Results: The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models showed that the cumulative rate of MACE was similar between the 2 groups (11.4% vs. 13.4%, log-rank P=0.185) at 3 years. However, the T2MI group showed higher rates of all-cause death [12.6% vs. 9.4%, log-rank P=0.019; hazard ratio (HR), 1.42; 95% CI: 1.08-1.85; P=0.012] and non-cardiac death (3.5% vs. 5.3%, log-rank P=0.043; HR, 1.55; 95% CI: 1.01-2.37; P=0.043) than the T1MI group. Male sex (HR 1.540; 95% CI: 1.218-1.947, P<0.001), old age (≥65 years; HR, 3.546; 95% CI: 2.645-4.753, P<0.001), low hemoglobin level (<12 g/dL; HR, 2.335; 95% CI: 1.841-2.961, P<0.001), high heart rate (>100 beats/min; HR, 1.852; 95% CI: 1.436-2.388, P<0.001), low glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (<60 mL/min/1.73 m2; HR, 2.373; 95% CI: 1.874-3.005, P<0.001), high body mass index (>25 kg/m2; HR, 0.644; 95% CI: 0.514-0.805, P<0.001), and low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (<40%; HR, 1.487; 95% CI: 1.095-2.020, P=0.011) were the independent predictors for 3-year non-cardiac mortality. Conclusions: Although the 2 groups did not differ in MACE, the total mortality rate was higher in T2MI than in T1MI, especially non-cardiac mortality. The independent predictors for non-cardiac mortality were male sex, old age, anemia, low GFR, tachycardia, obesity, and low LVEF.

Ambulatory blood pressure response to S-amlodipine in Korean adult patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: A prospective, observational study.

Although amlodipine is recommended as the first-line therapy for the treatment of hypertension, its use is limited by its potential side effects. S-amlodipine is expected to be able to minimize side effects of amlodipine with a similar antihypertensive effect by removing the malicious R-chiral form. However, sustainable blood pressure control with S-amlodipine has not been well established yet. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) profiles before and after a 12-week treatment of S-amlodipine. Patients received once-daily S-amlodipine 2.5 or 5 mg. ABP during 24 hr and office blood pressure were measured at baseline and after the 12-week treatment. Primary endpoints were changes of systolic and diastolic 24 hr ABP. After 12-week S-amlodipine treatment, mean systolic ABP (-15.1 ± 16.2 mmHg, p < .001) and diastolic ABP (-8.9 ± 9.8 mmHg, p < .001) were decreased significantly. Both daytime and night-time mean systolic BP and diastolic BP were also significantly decreased after the 12-week treatment. Global trough-to-peak ratio and smoothness index after 12-week S-amlodipine treatment were .75 and .79 for SBP and .65 and .61 for DBP, respectively. Age ≥65 years (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67-14.3) and nonalcohol drinking (HR: 3.09; 95% CI: 1.34-7.17) were independent clinical factors for target ABP achievement. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) were developed in 16 (6.4%) patients, including two (.8%) cases of peripheral edema. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of S-amlodipine in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension.

Optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target level in Korean acute myocardial infarction patients (<70 mg/dL vs. <55 mg/dL): Based on Korea acute myocardial infarction registry-National Institute of Health.

BACKGROUND: Current treatment guidelines for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) recommend lowering low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, previous clinical studies among East Asian AMI patients failed to prove its clinical efficacy of lipid lowering therapy based on Western target LDL-C level. Thus, the purpose of this study is directly to compare the clinical outcomes of target LDL-C < 70 mg/dL and < 55 mg/dL and identify optimal target LDL-C level and in Korean AMI patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2198 AMI patients in Korea AMI Registry - National Institute of Health were enrolled. Patients were initially divided into LDL-C non-target group (n = 1115) and target group (n = 1083). Successful achievement of follow up target LDL-C was defined as <70 mg/dL and ≥ 50% reduction from baseline. Target group patients were additionally divided to <70 mg/dL group (n = 698) and <55 mg/dL group (n = 385). Propensity score matching analysis was done in non-target vs. target group and <70 mg/dL vs. <55 mg/dL group. In the matched population, the risk of 3 years major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (13.0% vs 9.8%, HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.56-0.96; p = 0.025) was higher in non-target group patients. However, the risk of MACE was similar in <70 mg/dL and < 55 mg/dL group patients (10.0% vs 8.1%, HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.46-1.22; p = 0.247). CONCLUSION: In the present study, target LDL-C level of <70 mg/dL and ≥ 50% reduction from baseline level was associated with better clinical outcomes in Korean AMI patients. However, further lowering target LDL-C level of <55 mg/dL showed no additional benefits.

Effect of Noise on Sleep and Autonomic Activity in Children according to Source.

BACKGROUND: Noise has been a major issue in children due to its effect on emotional symptoms and sleep problems. The present study investigated the effect of noise on sleep and autonomic activity in children according to three variables, namely, road traffic noise, aircraft noise, and noise sensitivity (NS). METHODS: The study is epidemiological in nature. A total of 474 subjects of four elementary schools were evaluated in conjunction with the 2014 noise map data gathered from two metropolitan regions, Seoul and Ulsan, in South Korea. Each subject completed the children's sleep habits questionnaire, and heart rate variability (HRV) was recorded. Analysis of covariance was performed using monthly income as a covariate. RESULTS: Aircraft noise was associated with night waking (P = 0.047), whereas no significant association was observed between sleep and road traffic noise. After stratifying by NS, no significant results were obtained for road traffic noise. However, high levels of aircraft noise in the high-NS group were associated with high degrees of bedtime resistance (P = 0.049). In terms of HRV, no significant difference was observed in the results between groups. CONCLUSION: Road traffic noise did not significantly alter sleep or autonomic activity in children, whereas aircraft noise exerted a negative effect on sleep. The findings suggest that the impact of noise on sleep in children varies depending on noise sources.

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Late Presentation of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on baseline characteristics, clinical practice, and outcomes of late presentation (12 to 48 h of symptom onset) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are limited. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate real-world features of STEMI late presenters in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era. METHODS: Of 13,707 patients from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health database, 5,826 consecutive patients diagnosed with STEMI within 48 h of symptom onset during 2011 to 2015 were categorized as late (12 to 48 h; n = 624) or early (<12 h; n = 5,202) presenters. Coprimary outcomes were 180-day and 3-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Late presenters had remarkably worse clinical outcomes than early presenters (180-day mortality: 10.7% vs. 6.8%; 3-year mortality: 16.2% vs. 10.6%; both log-rank p < 0.001), whereas presentation at ≥12 h of symptom onset was not independently associated with increased mortality after STEMI. The use of invasive interventional procedures abruptly decreased from the first (<12 h) to the second (12 to 24 h) 12-h interval of symptom-to-door time ("no primary PCI strategy" increased from 4.9% to 12.4%, and "no PCI" from 2.3% to 6.6%; both p < 0.001). Mortality rates abruptly increased from the first to the second 12-h interval of symptom-to-door time (from 6.8% to 11.2% for 180-day mortality; from 10.6% to 17.3% for 3-year mortality; all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Data from a nationwide prospective Korean registry reveal that inverse steep differences in the use of invasive interventional procedures and mortality rates were found between early and late presenters after STEMI. A multidisciplinary approach is required in identifying late presenters of STEMI who can benefit from invasive interventional procedures until further studied.

Higher Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction than ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Discharge.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare mortality rates after discharge between the patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and identify each mortality risk factors in these two types of myocardial infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2011 and 2015, 13105 consecutive patients were enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction-National Institute of Health registry (KAMIR-NIH); 12271 patients with acute myocardial infarction met the inclusion criteria and were further stratified into the STEMI (n=5828) and NSTEMI (n=6443) groups. The occurrence of mortality and cardiac mortality at 3 years were compared between groups, and the factors associated with mortality for NSTEMI and STEMI were evaluated. RESULTS: The comparison between these two groups and long-term follow-up outcomes showed that the cumulative rates of all-cause and cardiac mortality were higher in the NSTEMI group than in the STEMI group [all-cause mortality: 10.9% vs. 5.8%; hazards ratio (HR), 0.464; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.359-0.600, p<0.001; cardiac mortality: 6.6% vs. 3.5%, HR, 0.474; 95% CI, 0.344-0.654, p<0.001, respectively). In the NSTEMI group, low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; <40%), no percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), old age (≥65 years), and low hemoglobin level (<12 g/dL) were identified as risk factors for 3-year mortality. In the STEMI group, old age, low glomerular filtration rate (<60 mL/min/1.73 m²), low LVEF, high heart rate (>100 beats/min), no PCI, and low hemoglobin level were identified as the risk factors for 3-year mortality. CONCLUSION: The NSTEMI group had higher mortality compared to the STEMI group during the 3-year clinical follow-up after discharge. Low LVEF and no PCI were the main risk factors for mortality in the NSTEMI group. In contrast, old age and renal dysfunction were the risk factors for long-term mortality in the STEMI group.

The change in high-sensitivity troponin-T as a risk factor for significant coronary stenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-TnT) assays detect very low levels of cardiac troponin. This study examined the interval change between initial and subsequent hs-TnT levels and evaluated its ability to predict significant coronary stenosis. METHODS: The study analyzed 163 patients who presented with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and underwent coronary angiography (CAG) between April 2014 and May 2018. The 0 and 3-hour hs-TnT were checked. The patients were subdivided into positive (n = 32) and negative (n = 131) interval change groups. The presence of significant coronary artery stenosis on CAG in the two groups was compared. RESULTS: The positive interval change group was older and had higher 0 and 3-hour hs-TnT and blood glucose levels than the negative interval change group. Significant coronary stenosis was more common in the positive interval change group than in the negative interval change group (68.8% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.001). However, vasospasm was more common in the negative interval change group (6.3% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.003). The positive interval change group had higher rates of bifurcation lesions and received more percutaneous coronary intervention. In multivariate analysis, age, interval change of serial hs-TnT and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of significant coronary artery stenosis. CONCLUSION: This study identified a relationship between the serial change in cardiac biomarkers and the presence of significant coronary stenosis in patients with ACS. Serial hs-TnT change was associated with real angiographic stenosis in patients with ACS.

Comparative effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor versus angiotensin ii type i receptor blocker in acute myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries; from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry - National Institute of Health.

BACKGROUND: Selecting angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II type I receptor blocker (ARB) in patients diagnosed as acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is not established. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical effect of ACEI vs. ARB in MINOCA patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 273 patients between November 2011 to June 2015, diagnosed with MINOCA who were registered in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry - National Institute of Health were enrolled. Patients were divided into ACEI (n = 112) and ARB groups (n = 161). The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as cardiac death, recurrent MI, any new revascularization during 2 years clinical follow-up. Secondary endpoint was heart failure requiring re-hospitalization. Propensity score matching analysis was done. The incidence of primary endpoint was similar (10.4% vs. 15.6%, HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.29-1.47; p = 0.301) among both groups. However, the incidence of recurrent MI was significantly lower in ACEI group compared to ARB group (2.1% vs. 10.4%, HR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.04-0.86; p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the risk and incidence of MACE was similar between ACEI and ARB therapy in MINOCA patients. However, ACEI significantly reduced the risk of recurrent MI. Further larger scale multi-center randomized clinical trials are needed to clarify the proper use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blocker in these patients.

Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in acute myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease; From Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health.

BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy of ticagrelor is questionable in East Asian populations. Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with multivessel disease (MVD) are considered as high risk patients who might benefit from ticagrelor treatment. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical effect of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in AMI patients with MVD in Korea. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2275 patients between November 2011 and June 2015, diagnosed with AMI with MVD after successful percutaneous coronary intervention who were registered in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry - National Institute of Health (KAMIR-NIH) were enrolled. Patients were divided into ticagrelor (n = 837) and clopidogrel group (n = 1438). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as cardiac death, non-fatal MI, target vessel revascularization, or ischemic stroke during 2 years of clinical follow-up. Secondary endpoints were thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major or minor bleeding, net clinical event composed of MACE and TIMI major bleeding, any repeated percutaneous coronary intervention, heart failure requiring re-hospitalization, and stent thrombosis. After propensity score matching analysis, the primary endpoint was lower in ticagrelor group compared to the clopidogrel group (8.6 % vs. 11.9 %; HR: 0.68; 95 % CI: 0.50-0.94; p = 0.018). The risk of TIMI major or minor bleeding was higher in the ticagrelor group (10.8 % vs. 4.8 %; HR: 2.51; 95 % CI: 1.68-3.76; p < 0.001). The net clinical event was similar between ticagrelor and clopidogrel group (11.3 % vs. 13.6 %; HR 0.82; 95 % CI: 0.60-1.11; p = 0.195). CONCLUSION: Ticagrelor significantly reduced the risk of MACE than clopidogrel for AMI patients with MVD in Korea. However, the risk of TIMI major or minor bleeding was higher and the net clinical benefit was similar. Further large-scale multi-center randomized clinical trials are needed to clarify the proper use dual antiplatelet therapy in East Asian populations.